Forums

World Cup 2014

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
16 Jun 14 02:01
Joined:
Date Joined: 30 Mar 08
| Topic/replies: 2,518 | Blogger: Pleasegivemeanailedontip's blog
Isn't 2 holding midfielders meant to release the front 4 so they don't have to track back as much? Expert pundits seem to think were still playing 4-4-2 yet they still think it's an attacking side with Gerard and Henderson in the middle?
Pause Switch to Standard View England formation
Show More
Loading...
Report sickoflayinwinners June 16, 2014 1:22 PM BST
I think eng have decided that their best option is to play on the break with pace and I personally didn't think theyd cut much ice before the tourney but I was pleasantly surprised how well eng passed  the ball  and their overall play.
Report Pleasegivemeanailedontip June 16, 2014 6:40 PM BST
Me too, didnt have a problem with the performance or the set up really, I was more confused by the punditry. Dixon and Shearer saying Rooney was leaving Baines exposed suggests they think were still playing 4-4-2. I thought the idea of playing 4-2-3-1 was that Gerrard and Henderson take more responsibility to protect the back four and Rooney and Wellbeck generally stay forward to pick up the breaks and discourage Italys fullbacks from bombing on.
To me it looks like Roys made the shift from negative solid set up to a risk-taking counter attack set up but as soon as we lose to a good side the pundits are saying the left midfielder isnt tracking back and doing his defensive job?
Report kincsem June 16, 2014 7:49 PM BST
If you haven't got decent players formation won't make a difference.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com