|
By:
Agreed. Joke decision that smells pretty bad too. Can imagine it will leave a number of top goalscorer/ topgoalscorer place bets in dead heat land.
|
|
By:
Under the rules of the game it should have been credited to him in the first place. The trajectory of the ball was clearly on target imho.
|
|
By:
I take your point clydebank but surely the TSG should take into account whether the player was having a shot or crossing the ball first.
A blind man with a stick could see that he was merely crossing the ball (and badly at that!). |
|
By:
not really relevant unless you want to strike off all goals that weren't completely intentional
|
|
By:
and ffs, how could you call that a bad cross? created defensive chaos
|
|
By:
So you admit that it was a cross and not a shot then!
[;)] |
|
By:
Simply would not have been a goal if Melo hadn't touched it. Its Melo's goal.
|
|
By:
43/1 for top 4 goalscorer!
YEH BABY |
|
By:
They're trying to screw Suarez backers, getting back at Uruguay in anyway possible - disgraceful
|
|
By:
I'm kicking myself a bit because during the Netherlands/Brazil game and for an hour or so afterwards I was continually checking the FIFA website to see if they were going to re-credit the goal to Sneijder. I left a back of Vittek up to finish top 4 aswell the day after which was obv taken.
I remember UEFA crediting Joe Cole with a goal against Bayern Munich when his shot was going 6 foot wide. Every other source gave it as an own goal from memory. Cost me quite a bit that one. |
|
By:
why the stress over this? it was going on target so i was suprised to not see it given to him in the first place.
|
|
By:
I recall FIFA doing similar in 2002 , giving Ronaldo (Brazil) a goal when his shot heading well wide was miskicked in by a Chinese(?) defender.
|