Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
kincsem
02 Jul 10 18:49
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Apr 04
| Topic/replies: 10,856 | Blogger: kincsem's blog
(1) Phase One, pre-tournament: Certainty that England will win the World Cup.
(2) Phase Two: During the tournament England meet a former wartime enemy.
(3) Phase Three: The English conclude that the game turned on one freakish piece of bad luck that could happen only to them.
(4) Phase Four: Moreover, everyone else cheated.
(5) Phase Five: England are knocked out without getting anywhere near lifting the cup.
(6) Phase Six: The day after elimination, nornal life resumes.
(7) Phase Seven: A scapegoat is found.
(8) Phase Eight: England enter the next World Cup thinking they will win it.

(1) Certainty: Alf Ramsey thought he would win it in 1966, and in 1970.  Greenwood in 1982; Hoddle in 1998
(2) Enemy: In five of the last seven World Cups, they were knocked out by either Germany or Argentina.
(3) Bad Luck: In 1950 Gaetjens went for the ball, ducked, it hit the top of his head, and went in.  In 1970 Gordon banks got a stomach upset.  Failed to qualify for 1974 as Tomaszewski, Poland's goalkeeper (a clown!) didn't let England score.  In 1990 and 1998 lost in a penalty shoot-out.  In 2002 Ronaldinho beat Seaman from forty yards.  In 2006 Rooney got sent off for stamping because Ronaldo influenced the referee.
(4) Cheating: In 1950 the Brazilian crowd, and in 1970 the Mexican crowd wasted time by holding the ball in the stands.  In 1986 the hand of God cheat.  In 1998 Simeone play-acted to get Beckham sent-off.  In 2006 same for Rooney.
(5) Nowhere near: The only time England got close was 1990.
(7) Scapegoat: The scapegoat is never and outfield player.  They battle.  The only exception was Beckham for his sending off.
The scapegoat is usually a managerial figure: Wright as captain in 1950;  Jope Mears as chief selector in 1958; goalkeeper Bonetti in 1970.  In 2006 it was Cristiano Ronaldo.


This is almost world for word from the book Why England Lose by Simon Kuper & Stefan Szymanski.

I read it in the last few months.

Nothing changes.
Pause Switch to Standard View Why England Lose
Show More
Loading...
Report One footed pony July 2, 2010 7:01 PM BST
And then, the players turn up.
Report Tackletart July 2, 2010 10:30 PM BST
So true
Report Artadi July 2, 2010 10:32 PM BST
To cap it all they are simply cr*p lazy prima donnas!
Report comingupthehill July 3, 2010 8:23 AM BST
in a premiership team they start the season and after a few games certain players arent preforming so they try other players - eventually they get their best team.

england dont play enough proper games - so we are testing players in big tourno s,and just as we get an improvement we get knocked out,i.e milner for lennon,defoe for heskey,upson carragher,james for green.

we need a 6 nations type mini tourno on the 2 years theres nothing going on ,south amercians have copa,confederation plus 18 qualfying games ,african nations seems to be every year and so on .

the f.a must have a mini north euro tourno,six nations type cup - that way capello can find out what we all know,heskey cant score,carragher too old,4 4 2 dosent work etc etc - then when we enter world cup we ve sorted our best squad out - tried and tested.
Report raspberrybottom July 3, 2010 8:48 AM BST
Bring back the Home Internationals!
Report comingupthehill July 3, 2010 8:52 AM BST
anything,at least we could try out different players ,rather than find out when its too late that heskey cant score.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com