Scott Geiners record on newcomers is 11/37 now. If you backed his newcomers blind on the tote, you'd win $2.88 for every $2 staked. I wouldn't be divulging these things if the forum was busy by the way ;)
Scott Geiners record on newcomers is 11/37 now. If you backed his newcomers blind on the tote, you'd win $2.88 for every $2 staked. I wouldn't be divulging these things if the forum was busy by the way ;)
Such a shame about the forum. Used to be buzzing. :(
No problem.Understanding the behaviour of different trainers is one of the biggest keys to unlocking value.
Such a shame about the forum. Used to be buzzing. :( No problem.Understanding the behaviour of different trainers is one of the biggest keys to unlocking value.
I know I'm overly forthright in my views sometimes and get it horribly wrong, but think the market have really got this wrong. 10 doesn't suit the distance at all IMO.
I know I'm overly forthright in my views sometimes and get it horribly wrong, but think the market have really got this wrong. 10 doesn't suit the distance at all IMO.
That's exactly what I was thinking too. I figured that the 3 was cutting its claiming price by a third because of its poor performance last time out and it would run like a donkey, but no. Also, I expected 4 to attempt to go wire to wire as I didn't see a lot of pace in the field. Anyway, all things considered, 2.0 was quite reasonable IMO.
That's exactly what I was thinking too. I figured that the 3 was cutting its claiming price by a third because of its poor performance last time out and it would run like a donkey, but no. Also, I expected 4 to attempt to go wire to wire as I didn't
6 is easily the best horse on form, but has it deteriorated at the new barn?
I make 6 the favourite, but 7 could be value. 7 has the most pace, but is it just too much of a donkey to stay in front, assuming it gets the lead?
EVD R4hmmm. Could the 7 go wire to wire? 6 is easily the best horse on form, but has it deteriorated at the new barn?I make 6 the favourite, but 7 could be value. 7 has the most pace, but is it just too much of a donkey to stay in front, assuming it
Very disappointed with the 7. Broke very poorly, but not sure if that made a great deal of difference. Maybe I need be wary of Preciado's Philadelphia shippers at Penn? Will take note..
Very disappointed with the 7. Broke very poorly, but not sure if that made a great deal of difference. Maybe I need be wary of Preciado's Philadelphia shippers at Penn? Will take note..
Yeah. We had quite a conversation two or three years ago. You weren't quite on top then, but you said you *knew* you could beat this game, and were determined to do so. Given this and your stunning night a few weeks ago, I'd say you've got there!
Yeah. We had quite a conversation two or three years ago. You weren't quite on top then, but you said you *knew* you could beat this game, and were determined to do so. Given this and your stunning night a few weeks ago, I'd say you've got there!
It impressed me how seriously you took it. Most punters are just there for a quick thrill or two, but you clearly had a bigger plan for your betting. Keep up the great work!!
It impressed me how seriously you took it. Most punters are just there for a quick thrill or two, but you clearly had a bigger plan for your betting. Keep up the great work!!
6 is a worthy favourite, but 9 looks overpriced at 11.0+. Just wondering how well it can transfer its Charles Town form to Penn. Seems well worth a go.
Pen R96 is a worthy favourite, but 9 looks overpriced at 11.0+. Just wondering how well it can transfer its Charles Town form to Penn. Seems well worth a go.
Thanks a lot Honky. That means a lot. I definitely find it very interesting and it's been a long-term battle for me to beat the market, because I always had a strong sense that it was a beatable and passion for data analysis.
Thanks a lot Honky. That means a lot. I definitely find it very interesting and it's been a long-term battle for me to beat the market, because I always had a strong sense that it was a beatable and passion for data analysis.
The change of jock may have been a key to the Penn winner. Rodriguez got two good results from that horse early in his career, and this was his first time back in the horse's saddle since July 14. Could be co-incidence, but it could be he knows how to get that little more from the horse. Didn't gun him right to the lead either, in contrast to the last two jocks.
All easy with hindsight though!!
(I thought your 3 had actually got up at the end and just nailed it there at EVD!!)
The change of jock may have been a key to the Penn winner. Rodriguez got two good results from that horse early in his career, and this was his first time back in the horse's saddle since July 14. Could be co-incidence, but it could be he knows how t
Actually, that was a different jock called Rodriguez that was on the Penn winner earlier in his career! Maybe KP should have a Rodriguez rule to go along with his Cat rule!!
Actually, that was a different jock called Rodriguez that was on the Penn winner earlier in his career! Maybe KP should have a Rodriguez rule to go along with his Cat rule!!
lol Honky! There does seem to be a correlation between names and ability in the horse racing world. Could be culturally influenced?
I've got to admit, I've never factored in jockey ability much. Something I perhaps need to give more consideration to. I tend to see a good jockey booking as a sign of positive intent on the trainer's part.
lol Honky! There does seem to be a correlation between names and ability in the horse racing world. Could be culturally influenced? I've got to admit, I've never factored in jockey ability much. Something I perhaps need to give more consideration to.
Yeah, I'm not too bothered about the jockey either. There's enough to consider just assessing the horse! Plus it's rather hard to analyse a jockey - I prefer to boil things down to figures that I can use, and a simple win-rate doesn't really tell me much. The only time I'll really pay attention is when backing first-time starters. As you say, a big jockey-signing signifies trainer intent, and if a big jock is choosing a FTS, I'll take that as a good sign, assuming the other more-crucial factors are in place.
Anyway. Enough blether from me. Night.
Yeah, I'm not too bothered about the jockey either. There's enough to consider just assessing the horse! Plus it's rather hard to analyse a jockey - I prefer to boil things down to figures that I can use, and a simple win-rate doesn't really tell me