U.S. Horse Racing
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
13 Apr 15
21:49
Joined:
Date Joined:
12 Mar 15
Parx R9 WTF was that with horse 3?
Show More
MNR race1 lumped on 8. Looks like everyone else has too...
Truly am happy for you as its not easy winning.
Cheers bro.
No 10 at sun. Presume you mean the 8??
Sunland I've played 1 and 4 gl
No 10 at sun. Presume you mean the 8??
Sunland I've played 1 and 4 gl
Well aware of that as am on the receiving end .
Well you did not get alot of help form the saddle there .That was poor form the jock.
Finished third and out the back door with no way through.
Not good. Playing the 4 @ MNR last chance saloon for this nag. Hoping the Parker horse is overbet and misses the break.
Well betting against parker is not profitable .
big lay of the fav at mountain to get me out of the ppooo
Evening. 1 at Turf is the value, 4/1? oh yes. can't have the fav. Big on 1.
Against the well punted 3 @ the indian track gl
Some big bets here for sure and there will be a loser .
Well cluded up punters @ this 6 again but not for me but not laying it neither gl
Tup the jolly is too short but its hard to put a solid one against it .
Does not justify its price so layed it small gl.
Does not justify its price so layed it small gl.
Look the 4 is gleeming and backed it tup gl all off now.
Pid .
Well not my favoured track however this 1a is too short but got done twice last night with a similar approach so guess yourself but for me the 2 is the bet.
gl all.
Well not my favoured track however this 1a is too short but got done twice last night with a similar approach so guess yourself but for me the 2 is the bet.
gl all.
always a curious thing when there is 1 & 1a, and 2 & 2b - seem to go off the same price on track but betfair has them poles apart on betting
Dumb and dumber said the 4 will be 2/5 @ post .
Obviously not watching the horse as its a reactor.
Mount.
Obviously not watching the horse as its a reactor.
Mount.
Agreed theonlywayforward. Can only think jockey on #7 thought #4 would stop to a walk.
you would be dissapointed with the jockey if you where on the 3 Shungo at race 5 at Presque
Didnt give it any sort of ride until it was to late
Didnt give it any sort of ride until it was to late
Good effort by jock on #3 at PID to get it beat.
was thinking that....almost a look over to ensure he wasn't pressing too hard
The 7 @ mount on its toes and a lay here gl if you follow.
theonlywayforward
the problem with the 7, is it stands head and shoulders above this field.
in theory, it should win this race by 6 lengths or more.
the problem with the 7, is it stands head and shoulders above this field.
in theory, it should win this race by 6 lengths or more.
cannot even begin to say why, but i'm back the #5 @ Mount - gl
im against the odds on fav number 1 at mount, quite a few of these have chances especially on the sloppy track
I couldn't pick my nose at the mo - can't see past the #6 at Presque, but who knows
Mind I have been extremely unlucky @pid the last 2 nights cant have this 6 as not that the rest make alot of appeal for betting but serious questions about this with a record of 2 from 37.
GL all.
GL all.
i think a watching brief is called for....ciggie time out - gl whoever decides to call it
mount
like the 6 despite the time off, could easily win this.
likeiwse the 5 despite the time off, should be competitive in this.
5 and 6
like the 6 despite the time off, could easily win this.
likeiwse the 5 despite the time off, should be competitive in this.
5 and 6
Got some bizarre email from BF regarding the last race at PID saying they incorrectly removed a non-runner. Includes the line:
"Our policy in these circumstances is to: void bets matched since the non-runner (only applies if a reduction factor was applied)"
This sentence seems incomplete. Does that mean all bets matched since the non-runner was removed will be void? Typical of my luck if so.
"Our policy in these circumstances is to: void bets matched since the non-runner (only applies if a reduction factor was applied)"
This sentence seems incomplete. Does that mean all bets matched since the non-runner was removed will be void? Typical of my luck if so.
Yep. Just checked, my trades on a non-affected runner been voided. Fcking retarded canutes.
Jun 9, 2015 -- 1:09AM, Darlo Bantam wrote:
Got some bizarre email from BF regarding the last race at PID saying they incorrectly removed a non-runner. Includes the line:"Our policy in these circumstances is to: void bets matched since the non-runner (only applies if a reduction factor was applied)"This sentence seems incomplete. Does that mean all bets matched since the non-runner was removed will be void? Typical of my luck if so.
yes darlo, i got a big refund!
fortunate escape
6 just didnt have enough 
Mount is proving difficult tonight
Mount is proving difficult tonight
Going to have to stop with the US Racing with the complete incompetence from BF at the moment.
The runner, 1A. Put Her Back Zach was erroneously removed as a non-runner from the race PrIsleD (US) 8th Jun, 00:55 R7 6f Claim. It has now been reinstated. Our policy in these circumstances is to:
reinstate previously matched bets on 1A. Put Her Back Zach
readjust matched bets that were adjusted by the removed runners reduction factor
void bets matched since the non-runner (only applies if a reduction factor was applied)
One or more of your bets may have been affected by these changes. Please accept our apologies for the error. Should you have any further queries please contact the helpdesk on 0870 0110 444.
Kind Regards,
The Betfair Team
reinstate previously matched bets on 1A. Put Her Back Zach
readjust matched bets that were adjusted by the removed runners reduction factor
void bets matched since the non-runner (only applies if a reduction factor was applied)
One or more of your bets may have been affected by these changes. Please accept our apologies for the error. Should you have any further queries please contact the helpdesk on 0870 0110 444.
Kind Regards,
The Betfair Team
Just reading this so does that mean all bets in that race are void
PID race 8
Think the 2 should win this comfortably, 6 may have a chance late on.
Think the 2 should win this comfortably, 6 may have a chance late on.
awful camera work at PID - why do they need to zoom in on the front runners down the back straight?
Marcus: Hello welcome to Betfair you are chatting with Marcus. How can I help?
You: Hello
You: can you explain what happened to my bet in the 00:55 Presque Isle Downs (USA)
Tue 9 Jun R7 6f Claim
Marcus: Hello there and a very good evening to you.
You: hi hope your well
Marcus: Yes all bets on that market have been voided for the time being whilst the traders are investigating some conflicting information.
Marcus: I assure you not to worry, once they have updated they will settle all accordingly.
You: so I guess you are holding on to the money until this happens or have I already been refunded
Marcus: At the moment I am not aware of what is happening with it or what is the cause but we were told the above.
You: lol brilliant
You: Hello
You: can you explain what happened to my bet in the 00:55 Presque Isle Downs (USA)
Tue 9 Jun R7 6f Claim
Marcus: Hello there and a very good evening to you.
You: hi hope your well
Marcus: Yes all bets on that market have been voided for the time being whilst the traders are investigating some conflicting information.
Marcus: I assure you not to worry, once they have updated they will settle all accordingly.
You: so I guess you are holding on to the money until this happens or have I already been refunded
Marcus: At the moment I am not aware of what is happening with it or what is the cause but we were told the above.
You: lol brilliant
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539