|
By:
SD #1 - WIN (top jockey on board - should go close)
GL |
|
By:
SUF
1 is a shipper from better races, but I'm not sure its barn change is a positive thing, and it is paceless, which I think is a negative at this meeting. I've backed 4 at 4.0+ because it has gone close in similar races and has pace. |
|
By:
5 ROMPS IT
1 second |
|
By:
4 had no pace either. I liked the 5's efforts two and three back, but I passed on it because of its last race.
|
|
By:
gd lk to the old boy at suffolk
|
|
By:
Good evening all, very poor racing tonight, minimum stakes perhaps the best policy.
Best of luck to all |
|
By:
ffs i hope iam as fit as the 75 year old jockey at suff when i get that age
|
|
By:
SUF
4 at 17.0. I don't think this is as bad as it looks. Disappointing on slop last time out, but has gone close in similar races on fast tracks. |
|
By:
I have dutched the 4 and 7 at suff downs
|
|
By:
3 and 4 for me
4 in particular is very consistent throwout the slop run last time and double figs is massive |
|
By:
T Piamarini, spiller, do you think he is the best jock at suff? I've never paid much attention to jocks at that meeting.
|
|
By:
SD #7 & #8 for me
GL |
|
By:
hope the old boy wins even tho i lose if he does
|
|
By:
Rowan - I certainly do along with Hector Ramos. (both top jockeys)
|
|
By:
Pleased you agree Jbarnes.
|
|
By:
eve all and GL
the last time i looked Tammi Piermarini didnt have a set of balls! |
|
By:
annoyed could barely get a bean matched on the 3 still a small winning race
|
|
By:
3 beat 8
|
|
By:
Well done on the 3 J Barnes.
|
|
By:
the 6 is a fair enough price here at del on here imo
having the run a big advantage not a lot to beat |
|
By:
wd j barnes
|
|
By:
3 at del for me
|
|
By:
I would have looked at that at DEL if it wasn't so close to the off. Good luck J.
|
|
By:
6 for me del
looks best of the experience but all poor |
|
By:
wd jb and bluenose 6 hacks del
|
|
By:
pleasing that still green might win again at a level
|
|
By:
Well done J and Blue.
|
|
By:
SUF
4 at 4.4. I can see the logic behind the 2's favourite billing, as this is its first fast track attempt at this grade having dropped in class from allowances, but I disagree that 4 is so much worse. |
|
By:
4's last effort where it finished ahead of the 2 was on slop. It's better on a fast track imo.
|
|
By:
SD #2 saving on #7 (big bet on the #2)
GL |
|
By:
8 and 3 for me suffolk
tbh dont like the two favs all that much |
|
By:
8 stepping up in class, 3 beaten by over 16 lengths last time out.
|
|
By:
yep both need to improve tbh
|
|
By:
3 looked OK on its maiden win two back, but 8.0 isn't good value in my opinion. We'll see.
|
|
By:
I suppose your logic is that the field is pretty weak.
|
|
By:
very strange race that imo
|
|
By:
BBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMM
7 wins (I made a £18 profit then LOL) |
|
By:
Well done on the 7 Spiller.
|
|
By:
w done spiller
|