|
By:
Not so impressived with that salary...
![]() |
|
By:
I am actually logged off when I write this.
![]() |
|
By:
That "mind numbing $757 million per day" line should read PER HOUR. Yes, PER HOUR.
I also missed including the commercial real estate wave of defaults that is about to hit (they were "rolled-over" in a classic extend and pretend fashion in 2009/10) as part of the building stain on their banking system but there's only so much a man can think of while serving champagne. Enjoy easter, or what's left of it. ![]() |
|
By:
strain, not stain....duh....
....this champagne is awfully good... ![]() |
|
By:
1000 words but not a single piece of news.
we alresdy know all these things and it has been the case for a while now. So what is the housing crisis has not bottomed? So what if europe has more bad news? This is common knowledge. You entire argument is based on 1.Money printing giving only one possible result 2. BB is lying about printing more 3. Inflation is much higher than official figures. Answer this then. BB anounces QE 1- melly believes him BB anounces QE 2- melly believes him BB announces NO QE 3- melly does not believe him ![]() ![]() You claim inflation is much higher in reality than official figures- this is not the case. Whilst I would concede that govt rig the weightings to give the lowest possible result, inflation is still low. You are constantly referring to the price of petrol and the cost of putting a meal on the table ( which by the way is a dead giveaway you have a small limited income) yet you make no references to things that have fallen in price.EG electronics, the cost of a mortgage etc. You are using only evidence that suits your heavily biased perspective. You argue that the US economy is not improving, that all the figures release are somehow false.You chose to believe figures that are bad during the crisis but ignore those same figures when they show improvement. You claim that any figure showing improvement is a lie but then use the fed bought 61 % of USG debt in 2011- did'nt you just say the FED was lying? There is NO legitimacy to the argument that uses fed figures to support its argument and then dispells the FED figures when they don't suppot the argument. Either the FED is lying or its telling the truth. Now onto more printing argument- given that QE 1 and QE 2 have already occurred and as a result there has been no collapse and no substantial inflation- why og why would QE 3 result in anything other than the same? College debt btw is a red herring, as I understand it that debt is not paid back in the same way as a housing loan, it is only paid once the borrower gets a job and it comes out of salary.No salary no repayments are required. We have the same system in OZ. Your way melly of looking at the world is strictly simpleton. A+B+C= D .For you there is only ever one possible result,no matter what the discussion.You absolutely refuse to accept the possibility that A+B- C +D = E. Things go up, and down and sideways, in the financial world there are many possibilities. Your failure to recognize that, as well as your intolerance for any other point of view is why you are so poor and worried about the price of a family meal. |
|
By:
Of course you knew all that, you know, the "figures" and all that...LMFAO. The fact that you didn't mention any of those in the pages of litter you put up is neither here nor there.
Your knowledge of this stuff is somewhere between more than comical and less than anecdotal. You can twist, you can turn, you can go into full convulsions with the garbage you keep putting up here but anyone who can fog a mirror can see through that.......and easily come to the conclusion that you are epically ignorant. END OF. |