Ooooh my Gawd, what have I done ????

Good spot.

Just noticed this strange thread.
I suppose the only way this matter could possibly be clarified is if this other poster came on here and stated that he/she was me.
But if he/she did that then that would confirm M is right and the point of any subterfuge would be lost, but if he/she does not do that then that would either me that he/she is not reading his and thus does not know what is being asked of he/she, or he/she merely wishes to continue the subterfuge.
The question this all begs of me is why would someone indulge in this type of subterfuge if he/she was simply going to apparently continue was he/she was doing in the past, that is seemingly just trolling M.
But this question is essentially totally rhetorical, as M has taken to blocking my further posts and so presumably will not be reading this post to answer this question.
I am somehat concerned to read that I am apparently not me, as it leaves me wondering whether everything else around me is not what it appears to me to be. Most disturbing.
But if I am this other person then I will start posting as this other person does but continue to pretend that I am really me and not he/she.
Exactly. Perfectly straightforward to any and all who have bothered, for any strange reason, to read this far into this weird post from me. (or is it the other he/she ?)

Btw that was not really me posting but the other he/she. Get it ?

Oh and I'd like a dash of relish with that paranoia.

But the essential point remains, which is that M is the only true blue economist on this forum, and I don't "troll" him in any manner for being that.
I merely question his total one eyed analysis of all these ever evolving matters, when we all know that it is a very inexact science.
He is neither totally right nor totally wrong on anything economics related.
He just has a better detailed grasp on these things that the mere layman, but that doesn't translate necessarily into bottom line profits or even useful investment info.
He's not a trader in any sense of the word. He's an ivory tower boffin, mostly just providing personal interpretations of  past period statistical information. Interesting to read ( if you're not bored by such things) but not gold dust in the sense of actually helping you to make more money than you hopefully currently are.
I am going to back off from commenting on any of his posts from now on, as it really should be for everybody to make up their own mind on these matters.
My views are, and always have been, just subjective and essentially irrelevant to others' different interpretations of his posts.

Only troll on this forum is the idiot who posts 100 times a day on matters that he thinks he knows everything on when the truth is he knows little to nothing. I think a lot of people have stopped posting altogether because they're tired of this idiot troll hijacking every post, the fact is this guy is deluded and clinically insane and should be looked down upon and ridiculed for the clown he is.

Pierre, anger issues or did you decide to go long just at the wrong time?

Doubt it, all the permabears went bankrupt months ago.

Well said Whippet.....and the real reason he is not posting any more......but he blames me for it. That's rich !!!!

Also explains his anger issues.

What explains Menelaus's ?
Not enough adulation/respect being shown to him on here or in the office ?
Not getting enough nooky at home or in the office ?

Unfair and below the belt I know, as he can't see what I'm posting.

No-ones posting its just the same 2 or 3 muppets, im making money while you argue your pathetic pointless points, 12500 and 6000 was the call, 1320 in gold, hows Illumina doing whippet? LOL maybe when it drops to 20 i'll buy some.

I have no need to post on here, George Soros and his like dont waste time arguing with jealous plebs and nor will i.

"I have no need to post on here"

Then STFU

Whippet GETS IT and you don't. Which means he'll prosper while you go broke bragging about it on this forum.

You truly are the forum's CLOWN and considering the things I posted about MrBen that says a lot.

Maths obviously not your strong point Pierre. It's still well above the price I bought it at, as you well know. Doesn't that mean I am in profit? 

It does make one wonder whether your claims about making money are actually true. I would bet you have got confused and are actually massively in the red.

Whippet, you're funny. Maths not his strong point???

I'm dumbfounded !!!!

What precisely *IS* his strong point besides posting "imminent market crash" for the last two years and aftertiming "I'm making money"?

The market has turned ugly and I'm prepared to bet a lot of money he doesn't even have a clue or understand why.

And comparing himself to Soros qualifies for the joke of the year.

Ignore him Whippet and stay the course, he's a distraction, nothing more, nothing less.

Look at them both of them trolling the forum 24/7 trying to score points as its the only hope they have of winning anything.

Truly pathetic.

I'm not trolling, nor trying to score points. Not my style.

I'm trying to share some views from an economist unconventional viewpoint.

I have had enough exchanges with Whippet to know he GETS IT and enough with you to know you live in blissful ignorance.

I'll tell you why you don't post. It's because you have nothing to say without embarrassing yourself.

Now I'm a little bit reticent about posting the following for a couple of reasons, namely
1) I don't really go in for all  this psycho babble stuff
2) I may well be seen to be actually indulging in a bit of the very same trolling that M is accusing me of on here ( or at least  accusing my supposed alter ego).
But has anybody really bothered to try to understand exactly why M posts at such great length and detail on here on all matters economic ?.
He is not really getting any real heavyweight counterarguments from any other equally qualified theoretical economists posting on here, only some trading oriented responses from JW periodically.
So what is his posting motivation ?
Maybe it is because in the real outside debating world of equally qualified economic theoreticians, he is not winning his arguments either as easily or even at all. Maybe his theories are being regularly debunked/downgraded by persons even smarter than him ?
And so perhaps ( and this is the psycho babble bit) he is coming on here to get a few much needed victories, empty though they may be, to boost his waning self confidence in the tougher outside world ?.
Too far fetched ?

Or maybe he is just using us to polish up his presentation skills ?
Now that would be amusing.

'How are you going to profit?'

Go to that thread and you will have a clear sight of what these trolls are like, they are soon to ridicule but when they are wrong? do they acknowledge? no they just hope and pray that no-one notices.

I don't need to post anymore, just go to that thread, I think whippet should actually apologise to that guy, but nah these sorts never admit they're wrong.

Mel

"whippet gets it"  the blind leading the stupid.

You lost the plot.

Getting creamed on these markets has a tendency to do that to someone.

Posting rubbish on a public forum can also do that.

You don't know enough to polish Whippet's shoes, never mind taking him on a financial debate.

STOP EMBARRASSING YOURSELF !!!

I know I take a bullsh!t pill every morning, but does M take a vitriol one ?