|
By:
wouldn't the cost of becoming non-resident (eg moving, loss of income, travel, insurance etc etc) outweigh any CGT savings? seems a lot of work and time to save 20-30k. and If I was your theoretical wife I'd file for divorce the minute I landed in NZ.
![]() |
|
By:
If it's a residential property can you move into it for a 'reasonable period of time' so that it becomes your PPR thus avoiding CGT?
|
|
By:
Have not used the real numbers , basically bought 15 properties between 1999 to 2001.
I trained CIMA and barely scrapped my tax exams The actual gains are more like £2million so potential CGT bill over £500k I agree otherwise not worth it. I have been advised if I moved into a property bought for say £90k and now worth £250k If I just sell would get two lots of CGT relief but still be left with a 140 gain less expenses. If move in we could each claim 40k letting allowance, so thats £80k , then the CGT allowance and then taper relief for the last three years of ownership. That would leave only ~ 30k and am advised an IS could defer and this gain if held more than three years into a year with nil gain However thats only one property another 14 to go and a thumping amount to pay if all sold. Actually selling up and merely renting in New Zealand would be the idea |
|
By:
meant to say putting 30k into an EIS not an IS
|
|
By:
The actual gains are more like £2million so potential CGT bill over £500k I agree otherwise not worth it.
If it is classed as a business asset then you can get 75% taper relief if held for more than two years. For a higher rate tax payer that would represent an effective 10% rate so 'only' 200k That's assuming you didn't trade under a company, if you have then it is a different calculation. |
|
By:
not wanting to rub it in but no capital gains tax for NZ residents (unless technically a trader) on property, share appreciation and even dividends may be imputed.
in your case a good tax accountant would seem to be a worthwhile investment. |