Tradefair & Financials
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Menelaus
Date Joined: 03 Feb 05
Add contact | Send message
19 Jan 11 22:01
I have news fr you, moron, AAPL IS NOT in the S&P. It's in NASDAQ with a 23.3pc weighting !!!!
Date Joined: 03 Feb 05
Add contact | Send message
19 Jan 11 22:01
I have news fr you, moron, AAPL IS NOT in the S&P. It's in NASDAQ with a 23.3pc weighting !!!!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 8
|
By:
Who is the fraud, me, or you who bought at 335 ON THE S&P????
It trades on NASDAQ moron, and you'd know that if you ever traded a real stock in you life. |
|
By:
Sorry, are you a f*cking simpleton?
Don't forget that you were the person who also can't read the AAPL chart. According to you the bottom was $333.00 when it was actually $326, which you have conveniently ignored.  |
|
By:
Yes, I stand corrected the low was 326, albeit it lasted for about 2 min and 23 seconds. The stock opened gap down at 327.05, went down to 326 shortly after, and proceed to hit a high of 343.70 before the end of normal trading.
Amazing YET AGAIN that you bought at 335 (WITHOUT POSTING IT) when just as easily it could have been 443 (which puts your trade in the red) The point is, with the vague rubbish you chaps are posting ANY trade is a winning trade. It's that simple. |
|
By:
Oh look. Like clockwork, when you realise I have just completely owned you yet again, you resort to calling all my trades "made up".
I don't see why it is that unbelievable that I bought in on $335, which I might add, the price was hanging around on for just under 1hr 30. It's not like I called the bottom to within $0.50, after which it shot up $20 30 seconds later is it? Furthermore, I'm not going to post every trade I make on here, so idiots like you can get rich off my work. Anyway I'm off to bed now. I will leave you to get mauled by Ben and Winston. Show no mercy lads. [;)] |
|
By:
I meant 343......it's getting late and I'm very tired.
Let's exchange insults again tomorrow, shall we? |
|
By:
Menelaus
Yes, I stand corrected the low was 326 you stand corrected a lot dont you melly.Because you have no idea how to read a chart.Only after others point it out you suddenly" stand corrected" you need to read google more thouroughly melly, your getting embarrassed from a factual standpoint on a daily basis. Menelaus I meant 343......it's getting late and I'm very tired. why are you so tired? too much trawling the forum and googling? mopping floors and collecting trolleys is hard work melly.Get your rest.You loser. Let's exchange insults again tomorrow, shall we? |
|
By:
Mrben
Date Joined: 25 Oct 03 Add contact | Send message 20 Jan 11 01:35 you stand corrected a lot dont you melly.Because you have no idea how to read a chart.Only after others point it out you suddenly" stand corrected" you need to read google more thouroughly melly, your getting embarrassed from a factual standpoint on a daily basis. Spot on. What "director" on a "7 figure salary" do you know that can't even read a basic chart? They teach you that sort of thing in primary school. why are you so tired? too much trawling the forum and googling? mopping floors and collecting trolleys is hard work melly.Get your rest.You loser. Measuring men's crotches all day at the shop/boutique he works is hard work, and it's no wonder he feels so angry when he gets home. It's probably quite an upmarket boutique as well, so he has to stand there watching rich people splashing their cash all day. I would be jealous of successful traders making loads of dosh if that was me too. |
|
By:
Utterly, utterly clueless. If he was an animal he would have been put down by now. The funny thing is, he tries to lecture people on trading, yet has never risked a single £ of his dole money in his life.
|