You don't state which tax year, but if it was this year.
Providing you have not used any of your CGT allowance you will be subject to tax on 1,900 so £342 to pay
You don't state which tax year, but if it was this year.Providing you have not used any of your CGT allowance you will be subject to tax on 1,900 so £342 to pay
Apologies but it was actually 5th October 2006 when I sold the property after purchasing it the December before.
What calculations did you do to come to that figure?
Thanks madasahatter. Apologies but it was actually 5th October 2006 when I sold the property after purchasing it the December before.What calculations did you do to come to that figure?
You sold the asset in tax year 2006/7. The allowance for that year was £8,800. You have a liable gain of £3,200 which will either be taxed at 22% or 40% depending on weather you are a higher rate tax payer, or the gain would make you a higher rate tax payer. You would not be eligible for any taper reliefs as you hadn't held the asset long enough. You are allowed to deduct all expenses in buying, selling, insuring and maintaining the property while it was in your possession. If it was your principal place of residence then there would be no liability to CGT, unless property development was your business, in which case the whole profit would be classed as income - confused? Aren't we all!
CGT is now levied at a flat rate of 18% with, to all intents and purposes, no reliefs.
You sold the asset in tax year 2006/7. The allowance for that year was £8,800. You have a liable gain of £3,200 which will either be taxed at 22% or 40% depending on weather you are a higher rate tax payer, or the gain would make you a higher rat
I do fall into the 40% tax bracket and it wasnt my primary place of residence. It was purely investment.
So does that mean I will have to pay 18% of the £3200 after costs?
I do fall into the 40% tax bracket and it wasnt my primary place of residence. It was purely investment.So does that mean I will have to pay 18% of the £3200 after costs?
Costs come off the £3,200, then the tax is 40% of what is left.
You did buy it in your own name, or with your wife? If you bought it together, then you can split the CGT, so you would have no tax to pay.
Costs come off the £3,200, then the tax is 40% of what is left.You did buy it in your own name, or with your wife? If you bought it together, then you can split the CGT, so you would have no tax to pay.
Less Legal fees 1,500 Stamp duty nil Estate agents fees 2,500 Maintainance 200 Insurance 200 Weekly travelling expenses to property to comply with insurance conditions 200
Total Expenses 4,600
Profit after expenses 12,000 - 4,600 = £7,400
Unused CGT allowance for tax year £8,800
In that senario there would be no tax to pay. As the gain falls below the allowance.
The 'correct' way to calculate your liability.Bought for 100,000Sold for 112,000Profit 12,000LessLegal fees 1,500Stamp duty nilEstate agents fees 2,500Maintainance 200Insurance 200Weekly travelling expenses to property to comply with insurance condit
If you buy and sell too many properties you dont live in then the HMRC will take the view that it is in the nature of a trade and you will be liable to income tax rather than CGT on the gains. There is no hard and fast rule as to how many but I would suggest that more than 2 within a 5 year period could attract their attention.
If you buy and sell too many properties you dont live in then the HMRC will take the view that it is in the nature of a trade and you will be liable to income tax rather than CGT on the gains. There is no hard and fast rule as to how many but I would