|
By:
why would you take the word of a broker?
they just want your money **k me :( |
|
By:
Carrera32
I had a similar experience with Galvan except over a 3 year period - the cost per trade at .5% is inhibitive, although i didnt have the extra .7% for the stop-loss to be guaranteed . Likewise they soon lost the bulk of the £2500 i had deposited. However I placed a short on m&s myself with the little margin i had remaining and it went really well and brought my balance back up over £2000. Soon after i got a call from galvan apologising for how badly things had gone and offering me an "olive branch" in the form of much lower costs per trade of .2% I stupidly agreed to give it a go believing these vastly improved terms and maybe somewhat better fortune would see me to a profit. The lower costs per trade simply meant it took them longer to lose it - about 12 months !!! I've since opened my own account with IG and the cost per trade is only .1% ! They also told me Galvan are only charged .05% which makes their business very profitable whichever way the market goes. There's certainly a slight smell of "pyramid scheme" off it. Bottom line is - NOBODY knows with ANY degree of certainty the direction of any market over any period of time ....despite what you might intuitively think by looking at the pay packets of Goldman Sachs employees !!! |