| 1/4 WINNERS | ODDS | ALT / VALUE | ODDS | 1/4 WINNERS | ODDS | ALT / VALUE | ODDS | |||||||
| DJOKOVIC | 1.25 | TSITSIPAS | 10 | OSTAPENKO | 17 | VONDROUSOVA | 17 | |||||||
| KORDA | 13 | TABILO | 300 | RYBAKINA | 2.25 | ZHENG | 7 | |||||||
| MEDVEDEV | 2.7 | FELIX | 36 | GAUFF | 2.1 | HADDAD MAIA | 15 | |||||||
| ALCARAZ | 1.5 | ZVEREV | 4.5 | JABEUR | 7.5 | ANISIMOVS | 34 |
| REACH FINAL | ODDS | ALT / VALUE | ODDS | REACH FINAL | ODDS | ALT / VALUE | ODDS | |||||||
| DJOKOVIC | 1.62 | SHELTON | 41 | RYBAKINA | 4.5 | OSTAPENKO | 26 | |||||||
| MEDVEDEV | 6 | RUNE | 15 | GAUFF | 3.75 | JABEUR | 23 |
| FINALISTS | ODDS | ALT / VALUE | ODDS | FINALISTS | ODDS | ALT / VALUE | ODDS | |||||||
| DJOKOVIC/MEDVEDEV | 9 | DJKOVIC/ZVEREV | 21 | RYBAKINA/GAUFF | 17 | RYBAKINA/JABEUR | 90 |
| WINNER | ODDS | ALTERNATIVE | ODDS | WINNER | ODDS | ALTERNATIVE | ODDS | |||||||
| DJOKOVIC | 2.1 | TSITSIPAS | 50 | RYBAKINA | 6 | JABEUR | 40 |
| ROUND 1 | COR. | INC. | DRAW/POS. | ROUND 1 | COR. | INC. | DRAW/POS. | ||||||
| FRENCH 22 | 43 | 21 | 298/1765 | FRENCH 22 | 45 | 19 | 909 / 1078 | ||||||
| WIMBLEDON22 | 46 | 18 | 829 / 2158 | WIMBLEDON22 | 45 | 19 | 745 / 1255 | ||||||
| US OPEN 22 | 43 | 21 | 1177 / 1939 | US OPEN 22 | 40 | 24 | 411 / 1155 | ||||||
| AUS OPEN 23 | 47 | 17 | 818 / 2312 | AUS OPEN 23 | 47 | 17 | 1 / 1384 | ||||||
| FRENCH 23 | 42 | 22 | 67/1662 | FRENCH 23 | 47 | 17 | 303 / 1003 | ||||||
| WIMBLEDON 23 | 39 | 25 | 826/2061 | WIMBLEDON 23 | 38 | 26 | 825/1138 | ||||||
| US OPEN 23 | 40 | 24 | 763/1743 | US OPEN 23 | 43 | 21 | 467/1024 |
|
By:
Welcome back, I've linked here from my unofficial WTA thread so that any further preview related posts are in the same place. You've softened a bit on Demon which is nice to see. Novak pretended to forget Alex's name when he lost to him recently in the United Cup so there's still ill feeling there. I'll keep my ATP selections simple. Novak has done well in the past the few times that he's won the US Open in setting himself up to win in Melbourne, so I'm not opposing him as such. But the pirhanas are beginning to bite at his toes and I do think Sinner is probably going to come out the champion. Grigor can't be discounted at 50s.
Tournament winner J.Sinner (nap) 8.8 G.Dimitrov (nb) 50 Value bets A.Zverev 30 A.de Minaur 48 A.Fils 710 Long shots A.Shevchenko 1000 A.Bublik 1000 L.Van Assche 1000 Quarter winners and alternatives Q1 Schevchenko or LVA Q2 Sinner or Demon Q3 Dimitrov or Fils Q4 Zverev or Bublik |
|
By:
swiatek is in a totally different class to other women on hardcourts. she has won 6 of the last 13 Hardcourt WTA masters and masters series finals she has played in. her dominance in the 2023 WTA finals was crazy.
she lost 18 games in 5 matches v gauff (6-0.7-5), jabeur (6-1,6-2), Vondrousova (7-6,6-0), gauff (6-2,6-1) and Pegula (6-1,6-0)......... her dominance reminded me of roger federer's performance in the 2023 ATP finals when he beat agassi 6-3, 6-0, 6-4 in the final.......we all know what he did over the next few years. she played all the top women in that WTA finals event and simply murdered them. it is surely only a matter of time before she wins the aus open and US open on a regular basis, maybe not like federer did but something close. |
|
By:
Great write up Mesmerised ,appreciate it.
|
|
By:
Mes, you should get a gig with the Racing Post at the very least.
![]() |
|
By:
Unusually quiet on the prediction thread. Maybe mes would prefer if in future there's a separate general preview/prediction thread to his thread?
Anyway it's the halfway point and what a wild event it has been in the womens. Woz will be kicking herself at her second round muggery as the top half has collapsed even further around her head after going out. The tiebreak between Rybakina and Blinkova will live on long past this slam I suspect (that Rybakina miss at 12-11 in the tb!!) but Blinkova crashing out in the next round was the most inevitable IJBABP ever. I hope she takes a lot away from the event though because she pulled out some incredible gets. Of the nine players I put up pre tournament in my linked WTA preview, Noskova (210 pre) and Azarenka (140 pre) are still going strong in that crazy top half. I'm concerened that Linda N (who worked on her prep with her coach to take down Iga) underestimates the threat of Svitolina, a player who unusually has changed her game style late in her career introducing far more variation and aggression. If she can avoid that potential landmine then she can win the whole thing. She makes fast decisions and good reads and most importantly has a game that can play through pushers and aggressive players alike. Edy has frequently picked up on her achilles heel (her tendency to seriously sulk aka Prague which was laid out on a plate for her) but there's less of that so far here. On that thread I predicted categorically that Noskova would beat Iga. I'll put up another two 'massive shock' selections. Krejcikova to beat Sabalenka at a huge 6.4. Barbora has pulled out of the mixed to focus on her singles form which was one of the high points of Czechia's BJK cup run. Her h2h isn't great but of the three matches she played with Saba on hard in 2023 she took her to three sets in two and won one. She's come back from a set down in three of her four matches here and Saba having only dropped 11 games in four matches (!) hasn't really been tested but looked a bit iffy the last time she was (the Brisbane final). Too short at 1.18. Kostyuk to beat Gauff at an enormous 7.6. Marta has quietly put together a mazy run through the draw. Surviving that nailbiter against Mertens has freed her up to take down some good scalps, particularly a straight sets annihilation of Timofeeva who had put out Woz. She's only played Coco once, a tight three setter in Adelaide last year. I think she's value here. She won her first 250 in 2023 and seems to be more focussed on her tennis so far this year but we all know what will be driving her motivation in her mind (and in Elina's mind ofc). Gauff too short at 1.14. In the event that both Krejcikova and Kostyuk win there would be no Iga, Rybakina, Saba or Coco in the semi finals of the first slam of the year which would be a healthy reality check imo. Listening to Laura Robson act like Noskova beating Iga was a massive shock was toecurling. Why is it so hard to accept that there are no elite womens players currently on the tour. None of these players are fit to lace the shoes of a pre-stabbing Seles, Graf, Serena, Navratilova or Evert and that's okay! Not every era has to have a superstar. If only commentators and the wider media could accept that and chart the progress of a tour that is still 'building the map' that would be just as interesting in its own way. |
|
By:
Currently no superstar I would agree with, but Iga had won 4 Slams the week after she turned 22. Gauff has been improving year by year and just won her first Slam. Not there yet, but she definitely has Superstar potential if she keeps progressing. Very marketable too, unlike Iga. With women's tennis being more physically demanding these days, it might be harder to dominate all year like players in the past have done.
Interesting shout on Krej. She's the Undertaker of the WTA, just when you think she's out she comes back and does something big. |
|
By:
and no hating on Laura, please!
|
|
By:
Yes I wondered if you'd push back on that as her occasional soc media buddy! Slight asterisk against the selection on Kostyuk after her two controversies since reaching QF. These are just my calls anyway, not suggesting what anyone else does.
|
|
By:
after swiatek fails at another slam, i will never bet on womens tennis again.
|
|
By:
Looks like I was a year too early
at the Aussie Open last year I had a Sabalenka v Zheng final @ 150/1, after being on the Zheng bandwagon for a while backing her at a few slams to win her quarter or make a final, I decided to relent for this slam and lo and behold, she makes the final, though did pick her as alternative quarter winner, she had every chance last year but retired with injury, I'm taking aback by the odds, there is a market that deserves to be punished, Zheng has every chance of winning this imo.The second Rybakina inexplicable lost to Blink182ova, the first thing I thought was I absolutely guarantee she will lose the next round, with the enormity of the win too big for her, classic 'I Just Beat a Big Player Syndrome', same as Burel beating Pegula then losing to Dodin in straightseven when odds on. Looks like I was wrong suggesting Novak had a phantom wrist injury, the writing was on the wall early on dropping sets to the likes of Prizmic and Popyrin, this was the first time in over 400 slam matches he's never had a single break point, my flabber is gasted. Said in the first post Sinner had a ceiling, looks like he's got a lucky break and again, can't believe he's favourite. I at least had Danill reaching the final but overall it's a loss with the predictions. For those that didn't understand the first paragraph, it was a play on the famous Australian song 'Land Down Under', before my time but I'm sure the oldies have heard of it, only recently seen the video, one of the worst music videos I've seen, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfR9iY5y94s I'll be happy for Sabalenka to win but now it's down to Medvedev to save Tennis Kind Regards. |
|
By:
Journeyman • January 13, 2024 6:09 PM GMT
Tournament winner J.Sinner (nap) 8.8 G.Dimitrov (nb) 50 As my record picking outright winners pre-event is decidedly patchy I'm bumping this one. Especially as nobody else picked Sinner pre. The sun does shine on a dog's backside sometimes! |
|
By:
yeah well done, I'm off to lick my wounds and to keep telling myself Sinner's unworthy, call it a coping mechanism, should be over it by the time the French Open starts in Sunny May
![]() |
|
By:
Cheers. Both your 'finalists' and 'alt finalists' picks were live right up till the semis so a frustrating one for you. Zverev really mugged a fantastic opportunity.
|
|
By:
Great shout journey. I really don't get how you call Sinner unworthy! He's an unreal generational talent imho. The only thing I would say is he never faced a real, or even close to that, Novak. I think he would have likely fallen had he. But given his outright price, he was a nice value pick and well selected by journey.
|