Tennis
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Djoko at 1.16
2.14 for 3-0. This appears to me short. Might be good to LAY.
It's easy to be a TB,...and there nothing is certain. So, one set Djoko can lose easier than 2.14
2.14 for 3-0. This appears to me short. Might be good to LAY.
It's easy to be a TB,...and there nothing is certain. So, one set Djoko can lose easier than 2.14
Show More
1.16 against an out and out servebot is never free money, could easily finish 67 67 67 especially on a faster hard court.
If Raonic cant give us a real match this time and ends up losing it 3-0 then he should just retire from tennis for good. Waste of all that talent and the tools he has to beat anyone.
That's a strange idea supernando, but just for interest's sake what would be the minimum score that Raonic would need to not retire?
Jan 28, 2015 -- 8:10AM, shiraz wrote:
That's a strange idea supernando, but just for interest's sake what would be the minimum score that Raonic would need to not retire?
that's a tricky question you just asked you old devil you
It must be strange for someone in Raonic's situation. He is the best player his country has ever had and therefore will be lauded accordingly, yet in the "tennis world" he is regarded as just a serve.
If it ends 7-6 1-6 2-6 1-6 it we wont have much of a match either so its not all about winning a set, basically i want him to play as good for us to start thinking at a certain point that Raonic might actually win it...even if Djokovic grinds it out in 4 or 5 at the end.
That's because i know there is much more to his game then just a serve these days but i am still not sure he is mentaly ready to beat Djokovic.
That's because i know there is much more to his game then just a serve these days but i am still not sure he is mentaly ready to beat Djokovic.
Djokovic was damn tight in that previous game but Milos was a coward as usual
Jan 28, 2015 -- 7:52AM, mesmerised wrote:
1.16 against an out and out servebot is never free money, could easily finish 67 67 67 especially on a faster hard court.
You must be on some crazy mushrooms...or Murray is too much on your mind. This is best of 5 match, lad.
I'd like to see him serving his mind out against best returner of all time for 3 straight sets.
Raonic has too much respect for him so he's getting tight. Just smack the ball Milos you can do it.
Jan 28, 2015 -- 9:06AM, yyyy wrote:
Jan 28, 2015 -- 7:52AM, mesmerised wrote:1.16 against an out and out servebot is never free money, could easily finish 67 67 67 especially on a faster hard court.You must be on some crazy mushrooms...or Murray is too much on your mind. This is best of 5 match, lad.
Jan 28, 2015 -- 7:52AM, mesmerised wrote:
1.16 against an out and out servebot is never free money, could easily finish 67 67 67 especially on a faster hard court.
easily finish as 67, 67, 67...you are listening to crazy commentators who are heavily biased on Canadian.
When you back hypelep who loses 2-0, lay serena 2-0 who win 2-0 and call nadal value who then loses 3-0. it's probably best to stay quiet yyyy
When you back hypelep who loses 2-0, lay serena 2-0 who win 2-0 and call nadal value who then loses 3-0. it's probably best to stay quiet yyyy
Hey, look: this is Djokovic! Not haleppsova, not SW, not Nadal.
I will eat my Laptop if Raonic wins this match!
And that's exactly how much I backed Djoko at 1.17
And that's exactly how much I backed Djoko at 1.17
Ranoic not improved as much as I though he would have from a couple years back. Thought he'd be up there with the big boys by now
who wins the first tiebreak? Another one of Novaks specials? GOes a break down then wins 7-5?
Ranoic should have been more aggressive that last point
I want Novak to win this match, because despite what some about Raonic's improvement mostly coming to the net more and standing closer to the baseline on second serve return, he is still a very one dimensional player and unfortunately always will be, players 6ft5 or above should be banned from Tennis imo.
Novak argue that hawkeye was ****????????????????????????
at the TB Raonic's shot.
at the TB Raonic's shot.
yyyy, I am not sure which is more disturbing....bb66 
for Nadal or your 
for Djokovic.
for Nadal or your for Djokovic.
I am surprised that Becker did not tell Novak to flatten the balls?? Thus every Raonic shot would go in the net.
Jan 28, 2015 -- 9:37AM, shiraz wrote:
yyyy, I am not sure which is more disturbing....bb66 for Nadal or your for Djokovic.
You are welcome to start our own thread, bb66.
t is not about MY Djokovic, it is about some wooden heads here, who are on some sort of mushrooms too. Listening too much biased TV commentators, who talking stupid things, not because they'res tupid, but because they got paid for it.
Anyone that says Gilles Muller has a better serve than Raonic must be doing some hard core drugs
Relax, there is plenty about Novak to like and his achievements have been somewhat overshadowed by having Nadal and Federer around at the same time.
Muller HAS better serve than Raonic. Particularly second serve. He is way above Raonic level. Fact.
mesmerise, I've got you right. No problem. What I want you to get is to think by your own head, and not by the head of Paid TV commentators, or other biased Westerners.
Raonic won 83% of first serve points in 2014 #2 on list, Gilles not even in top 50
Raonic won 54% of second serve points in 2014 #12 on list, Muller not even in top 50
If you're trying to fish, at least make it more plausible than that
Raonic won 54% of second serve points in 2014 #12 on list, Muller not even in top 50
If you're trying to fish, at least make it more plausible than that
This is rubbish. Raonic has no answers and the atmosphere is flat.
I guess most people are asleep. They haven't missed much.
you understand now what I am talking about, mr. mesmerise?
This is Novak. Forget about some MUGS like halep, questionable condition like nadal, and another beauty no much between ears genie...,
This is Novak. Forget about some MUGS like halep, questionable condition like nadal, and another beauty no much between ears genie...,
What do you think of Djokers level? Is this SuperNovak of 2011? Or is this slight dodgy Novak who only scraped a Wimbers win last year?
I backed Murray outright but not seen the level required yet to beat Djok
hard to tell yet. He had not had true challenge this far. We'll see him against Wawrinka. That'll tell a lot.
Now, i do not think he is at 2011 yet.
The 2011 Djokovic would've already finished Raonic, and be in locker room by now. The 2011 Djokovic would send flatten and sliced balls deep in Raonic's field. This one does opposite: sends him easy to hit bouncing balls.
Now, i do not think he is at 2011 yet.
The 2011 Djokovic would've already finished Raonic, and be in locker room by now. The 2011 Djokovic would send flatten and sliced balls deep in Raonic's field. This one does opposite: sends him easy to hit bouncing balls.
The 2011 Djokovic was more confident. That was a ROCKBLUFF! He did not think about his opponents at all. He just was delivering his unstoppable game!
And that's normal: in 2011 Djokovic was making his way through...so as a sych, he was not not much looking back. Just relentlessly move on, dismantle everyone and anything that was on his way!!
Now, he is in different position: sitting atop, with lot of legacy, fame, family, kid, he's a father.
And that's normal: in 2011 Djokovic was making his way through...so as a sych, he was not not much looking back. Just relentlessly move on, dismantle everyone and anything that was on his way!!
Now, he is in different position: sitting atop, with lot of legacy, fame, family, kid, he's a father.
Just keep in mind sftd, Murray is an unusual player because of his 'reactive' play and frequently lifts his level of play when there is a need (OK sometimes he does'nt lift it even when there is a need).
If Djokovic asked you to bend over you'd be down with your undercrackers by your ankles before he'd finished saying bend
even though I wish, I kind of am doubtful whether SoperNovak, ver 2011 will be up again? That version was a Determined Novak. Determined to win. It was like old Latin: "Aut vincere, aut mori"! (win or die). He was going for his life goal: to be world #1. Now he is there. That goal is not in target anymore.
He needs anotehr goal of a similar magnitude to drive him through. What would taht be? I do not see that one...or I might be wrong. Maybe that goal would be to cmplete career Slam? Maybe? It is that I do not see that strong drive in his eyes. Not just yet. Who knows...with Djoker, you never know.
That was a good question.
He needs anotehr goal of a similar magnitude to drive him through. What would taht be? I do not see that one...or I might be wrong. Maybe that goal would be to cmplete career Slam? Maybe? It is that I do not see that strong drive in his eyes. Not just yet. Who knows...with Djoker, you never know.
That was a good question.
Jan 28, 2015 -- 10:35AM, mesmerised wrote:
If Djokovic asked you to bend over you'd be down with your undercrackers by your ankles before he'd finished saying bend
you seem to be upset for some reason?...because I did not eat my lap-top?
...I promise, I will forgot that famous: it is easy to happened: 67, 67, 67!!
Jan 28, 2015 -- 9:17AM, mesmerised wrote:
When you back hypelep who loses 2-0, lay serena 2-0 who win 2-0 and call nadal value who then loses 3-0. it's probably best to stay quiet yyyy
Hang on yyyy, have you forgotten this???
"2.14 for 3-0. This appears to me short. Might be good to LAY."
"2.14 for 3-0. This appears to me short. Might be good to LAY."
hey I was right. He was traded 3-0 at 2.36 (correct me if I am wrong here). So, yes, Laying 3-0 at 2.14 was a deal.
Anything else bothers ya?
Anything else bothers ya?
Fair enough, I actually layed 3-0 @ 2.08 pre match for a little bit and that market traded at over 2.70 in the first set (3-3 0-30 I think) for a bit of money. Trouble with this type of bet, unless it is a really big match there is not much interest in these markets in play and getting sizeable bets placed at the right odds is very unusual.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539