

Mar 7, 2014 -- 11:40PM, ArmchairIdiot wrote:
I personally don't think health care improvements are to blame when we're talking about mutating cells. MRSA and other super infections, yes. Look how long they kicked their heels for over coming clean about cigarettes. We're fodder.
health care and standard of life improvement vanished loads of used to be deadly diseases and other life situations, which ,sort of ,were selecting weaker individuals and promoted individuals with stronger genes to survive and pass best genes to their offspring . adding average life expectancy sky rocking in past 100 years its certainly giving much bigger platform to all sorts of mutations when weaker genes are prolonging within next generations instead of being eliminated . .obviously mutations are key to life and evolution of life itself but when you starting neutralise impact of natural selection, mutations are branching with wider range and developing structures couldnt survive before naturally in tougher environment , then pass genes forward.
i guess in wildlife cancerous diseases arent that much common, cutting on broken(unsuitable for living)genes quickly(trough natural selection), as within livestock where those are common problem within many groups of domestic animals
good luck with the fight elena.
30 years old FFS.
. BBC whosed footage of her beating Coetzer at wimbledon earlier, happpy memories,shame cancer claimed another so young

It's a horrific disease