Tennis
eugenie will struggle with eposara on receiving end who can pick up most of the shots and counter attack for m deep positions especially on clay. dont think genie would like an extra ball in every rally and can make many errors
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:26PM, tw88betfair wrote:
Anyone ever seen a WTA tie break where someone looses the set from 6-2 up ?
haave seen 6-0 to 86 peng feneta 
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:27PM, mouse trap wrote:
li na lost 6-0 or 6-1 TB lead to Wickmayer
wickmayer was @1000 that match
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:28PM, hdieu wrote:
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:27PM, mouse trap wrote:li na lost 6-0 or 6-1 TB lead to Wickmayerwickmayer was @1000 that match
epic match, li na then totally collapsed in the 3rd set. it was somewhere in europe in the first half of 2011 i think, indoors
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:30PM, hollywood85 wrote:
11k
i mean odds,thanks
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:38PM, mouse trap wrote:
extremely slow SB
You using B365? THey've been horrendous the past couple of weeks - not up to their usual speed.
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:43PM, n88uk wrote:
MTO's without pics are always all over the place. Sometimes the market initially makes no reaction at all. And you get a retirement 2 points later. Others the market acts like the player just broke their leg, and they steamroll the match.
We had two last week like that except with pictures. Errani and then Jankovic despite the fact Jankovic was barely even injured and you only saw the slightest hint of a trainer on court.
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:44PM, Birchola wrote:
Why does Errani keep getting laid out to 1.2ish??
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:49PM, ;[p wrote:
maybe scoerboard has them mixed up like in isner levine mathc
it does looks a lot similar 
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:49PM, ;[p wrote:
maybe scoerboard has them mixed up like in isner levine mathc
??? Please explain.
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:50PM, Darlo Bantam wrote:
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:49PM, ;[p wrote:maybe scoerboard has them mixed up like in isner levine mathc??? Please explain.
nahhh just kidding lol
The difference is here that market was dodgy from point 1. This wasn't.
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:53PM, n88uk wrote:
Isner-Levine Darlo. People were following scoreboard with no pics, but there were clear courtsiders in the know of the actual result on court. The players were listed the wrong way round. People thought they were backing Isner up a set @ evens etc, but they weren't.The difference is here that market was dodgy from point 1. This wasn't.
!!!!!!
I was trading the Isner match until I fell asleep. Not sure I got away with that one, or would have been immune from the turmoil.
I have read of a similar match once before where the SB was the wrong way round.
Feb 27, 2013 -- 11:55PM, Charlesaf wrote:
It wasn't the match last night Darlo.
Ah right. Must have been the one I've previously read about then.
