Janowicz

whot is ur point exactly?

That this competition is a farce for the big boys,and he irritates me no end thinking he is better than he is.

funny that Kohl's and cilic were 1.4-1.5 pre match agains unknown guy to some peoole but it says a lot that actually people who know tennis rating his potential high.same against tipsy 1.6 tank concern or not ,janowicz was waged highly by market


but of course betfair forum people are usually last to know and usually pay the price for their tenis knowledge

Tips was surely just pummeled into tanking / retirement. I really can't see why he would turn down his best chance ever to win a Masters.

And Murray had match point.

exactly tanked on match point joke

i understand muzza tanked when given opportunity but jj worked for it had getting them to the ground first

He has been on the radar for a while now and has taken his chance, big serve and forehand, backhand looks dodgy though, they will find him out soon enough. I seem to remember nadal found somebody to good for him at wimbeldon this year,whots is name, forgotten already.

dodgy bachhand lol  i dont think u actually know what are you talking about


comparing 21 yrs old janowicz to rosol because he made an upset just cutting weight of your words to third at best

guy played less than 30 matches at atp level yet has already had great start at wimbledon and here in masters tournament, i will tell you that he will not play always like that but this is the level he is capable of and also he is not playing tennis for that long just starting to learn  and getting experiece really, has very good movement as for a toll guy and quite soft hands, plus service 

rosol lol

play at this level, mmm , nothing to loose atm, just swinging without thinking me thinks. Lets see how he plays when a place in the final beckons. Mind you I dont think theres a lot between his ears. LOL

do you know him if i may ask? swinging without thinking? did you actually watched any of his matches lol there is youtube, go and check his "dodgy" backhand lol


he is actually often  outmaneuvering his opponents  using whole court with lot of different shots drop shots etc he is definitively  not swinging without thinking lol, guy is 2.03 m  and moving like 10 centimeters shorter,

raonic, same age ,1.96 high and looking like steam-machine in terms of movement

US Open, NY, U.S.A.; 27.08.2012; GS; Outdoor: Hard; Draw: 128
Round    Opponent    Ranking    Score    
R128    Dennis Novikov (USA)     1,098    L 2-6, 6-7(6), 6-3, 3-6    Stats

moves well on this court, not so well at US open.

phhh lol what are you trying to prove wit this result  lol,  watch some you tube buddy

i would explain you this match but will not make any gossip stories about it on public forum


whatever who cares, lay him and tanks for the money

it shows you dont go from losing to a player ranked 1000+ at a grand slam to the dizzy heights he has achieved this week,where the players he has beaten have next week on their mind. eh good luck to him he has taken his chance, but i reserve the right to question his level in the game.

he was also at wimbledon if you noticed, he s level is there where u can see it in this week matches, novikov  defeat was dodgy as hell but ownt get deeper into that, im not Nostradamus cant say what he will be in next few years, but he have tools and ability no doubt

Janowicz is 50 to win Australian Open at 32 red