Womens tennis..... WWE Wrestling is more legit.

I am not someone who gets upset with losing a wager, i did not moan when Baltimore beat my Precious Pats on Sunday night but if i make a wager i want to be certain that the integrity of the result cant be called into question.... Oh well i will have too add WTA Tennis to the list of non competitive "sports".

WWE
Cricket
WTA Tennis

WWE? thats a fixed 'sport' made for kids. Is as real as Coronation Street - they do what their script says.

yeah gooner , i hear what ur saying ...however , if you know the integrity of an event is compromised it pays to read how its been compromised

Absolutely agree someone needs to look into these players and start handing out some life bans this is incredible muggery here and I have had enough of it

Sep 25, 2012 -- 10:28AM, nicky27 wrote:

yeah gooner , i hear what ur saying ...however , if you know the integrity of an event is compromised it pays to read how its been compromised

Quote of the day, i would love too know the script of these matches after watching 20 minutes of sam vs Schiavone it seemed to me the odds of 5.8 for Schia were backwards, i should have realised the odds were that way as the result was pre determined

obviously the result is in the ooks and someone is spending my money as we speak but i think its for the good of the game if hefty bans and or fines are handed out like Dado has said above

if this is mickey mouse u must be donald  the duck

someone is spending my money as we speak


people spending Your money for years,get over it

Wta tennis has some weird stuff going on at times thats for sure.

But to compare it to WWE, a childish, farcical pantomime is going too far.

Anyone who truly believes that WWE is really a sport and not an over-weight hams playtime for american dullards really needs to take a long look at themselves.

how did u lose nearly 6k in 6 hours ...you should employ me to look after ur bankroll

can u even bet on WWE

Sharapova wasn't even a miracle comeback

Lost a very tight first set in which she couldn't convert several set points, but was never even a break behind in sets 2 and 3.

and if I remember correctly she only ever trailed by a game ONCE during those two sets. At 2-3 in the final set. I could be wrong about that though. Would be nice if someone could either correct me or confirm it.

they plaued tight match at us open last yr .nothing special here

confirmed sadly because meant no really awesome odds
mug thread also confirmed

@edy

you can have a look if you're right @ flashscore, they have the sequence of points for the whole match

Today I 've laid all the favorites lower than 1.30 in WTA and ATP (around 14 bets). Already I've a 140% return of my stakes (thank you Kvitova, Ivanovic, Haase) and I wait the Bomogolov and Dimitrov games. Tokio, Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok LOL all are proper for fixed games LOL. Asian mafia is still there...

Not to mention that with some exceptions, many other favorites I've laid (Sharapova, Stosur, Verdasco etc) struggled for their wins. So WHY should anyone back these 1.10 crappy favorites in controversial tournaments and without much motivation?

it's your fault to bet on the underdogs and lost