|
By:
laying fed 3-0 is a bit risky :)
|
|
By:
Laying Li against watson is risky to and laying sabine risky to.
|
|
By:
Pavlychenkova may be a risk. She's listed as carrying a right thoracic spinal injury. Would rather lay her, Hantuchova has a chance.
I agree Fed one a bit risky too, Young has been hopeless of late, most the others look pretty good. |
|
By:
hey stevo, where is she listed as carrying an injury?
|
|
By:
Listed on the matchstat(dot)com website.
|
|
By:
every bit is risky, its all about having an opinion and I think these bets are up to the mark in terms of value and probability of winning
|
|
By:
thanks stevo, good luck tonight
|
|
By:
No probs mybets, hope you back a winner!
|
|
By:
Don't lay Bartoli at 1.2s, unless you want to go against a 79/1 record.
|
|
By:
and Burdette is useless.
|
|
By:
Lay Phau at 1.71: Loser
Lay Fish 3-0 at 1.65: Loser (traded lot higher) Lay Granloers 3-0 at 2.36: Winner Lay Davydenko 3-0 at 3.1: Winner Lay Simon 3-0 at 2.22: Winner Lay Federer 3-0 at 1.22: Loser Back Klizan at 1.81: Winner Lay Lisicki at 1.75: Winner Lay Delacqua at 1.58: Loser Lay Li na 2-0 at 1.30: Loser Back Burdette at 1.55: Winner Lay Bartoli at 1.22: Loser Lay Petkovic at 1.51: Winner Lay Wickmayer 2-0 at 1.90: Loser Back Pavlychenkova at 1.49: Winner |
|
By:
How much you won/lost yesterday, mate?
|
|
By:
putting $10 each bet (back & lay) for simplicity - i know you punters have all sorts of systems ;)
and if you play the market in-play....help your souls :D cumulative and rounding L -7 (phau) L -13 W -3 W +7 W +17 L +15 (fed) W +23 W +33 L +27 L +24 (na) W +29 L +27 W +32 L +23 (wick) W +28 Thanks for posting. $28 return on $150 bets is not bad. It's a tad under 20% If you could return 20% most nights of the week - you would be a happy camper. Cheers |