Jul 24, 2012 -- 10:55AM, RememberJeremyBates wrote:
tsango. That 500 I put on Pervak at the start certainly wasn't a professional decision, I'll grant you that. The commentator said that she came into the match carrying an injury, which is something I should have researched...undern. I had to commit more money and eventually switched to Cohen...
I'm just saying that I find it funny that gamblers use the term trade to make them sound professional rather than saying I bet on x then switched!
And you went one step further with using "furious trading"... lol
Jul 24, 2012 -- 11:15AM, bb66 wrote:
so b 3 6 5 only pays on completed matches? Thought of opening an account for arbing purposes, but isn't worth if that's the case.The difference between trading and switching is, that trading means reducing your exposure, probably for managing to have an all green position, in the optimum case switching green to and fro enhancing the profit even more, while switching means reversing red and green, in many cases with an increase of stake (or a decrease of potential profit).
no, trading doesn't just mean reducing exposure, though obviously it can. I didn't mention anything about switching and trading being the same though to switch you have to trade obviously.