Tennis
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
09 Jun 12
13:46
Joined:
Date Joined:
10 Nov 07
cannot believe the price edge here...got to be a nice angle here on the great djoker...
pound the backhand nole its your only chance against the clay master....give him nothing
the great man should not be underestimated like this....
the spaniard hasn't played a tennis player all tourney and we want to take 1.32 a joke if ever there was one.
take it to him nole
you can do it pal
the forum is behind you all the way pal go go go nole
djoker fans sign in and comment on how, he can take apart the spaniard in his own back yard...
pound the backhand nole its your only chance against the clay master....give him nothing
the great man should not be underestimated like this....
the spaniard hasn't played a tennis player all tourney and we want to take 1.32 a joke if ever there was one.
take it to him nole
you can do it palthe forum is behind you all the way pal go go go nole
djoker fans sign in and comment on how, he can take apart the spaniard in his own back yard...
Show More
3-0/ 3-1 nadal is the bet. Cant see Djoko take more than one set on current form of the players.
I'm not betting on this one, but I have a feeling Novak was playing "rope a dope" in their last 2 encounters 
so monaco, almagro,ferrer and federer are not tennis players
Can't see Novalk taking more than 1 game per set
if Monaco, Almagro, Ferrer and Federer are not tennis players
if Monaco, Almagro, Ferrer and Federer are not tennis players
Totally agree with the. OP , 4s is a massive price for djokovic , oh and just in case it has escaped anyone's knowledge it was djokovic and not nadal who played Roger Federer
!! As for Monaco almagro and ferrer, they are simply cannon fodder to rafa. I think rafa will win but 1.3 ?? I will lay that price all day long!
!! As for Monaco almagro and ferrer, they are simply cannon fodder to rafa. I think rafa will win but 1.3 ?? I will lay that price all day long!
Almagro gave a decent account of himself. Not sure what Ferrer was doing...
Possible trade, but the price represents his current ability to beat Rafa in his current form. This could essentially be no chance at all.
Even as a trade, if it's Rafa that starts better you'll be looking at 1.2 or less Rafa, so it's a toss-up that way too.
Fair points stu - the trade is all dependent on the first set for me and the match to be honest...
the djoker has to come out strong, get a foot hold in the match for me and if he does then nole will start to believe and then there is chances overall for me anyway...
the key for the djoker will be to attack the backhand...I thought against almagro who played well first set got at the backhand and for me is the only weakness i have seen from rafa...
the key for the djoker will be no unforced on the forehand side and to go for the lines as rafa will eat him up if playing down the centre like he did against jo will imo
the djoker has to come out strong, get a foot hold in the match for me and if he does then nole will start to believe and then there is chances overall for me anyway...
the key for the djoker will be to attack the backhand...I thought against almagro who played well first set got at the backhand and for me is the only weakness i have seen from rafa...
the key for the djoker will be no unforced on the forehand side and to go for the lines as rafa will eat him up if playing down the centre like he did against jo will imo
harry callaghan
Yes, very important points indeed.
The Djoker must also find a way to come to the net as often as possible,
in particular of course, when he is almost certain to close the point.
Yes, very important points indeed.
The Djoker must also find a way to come to the net as often as possible,
in particular of course, when he is almost certain to close the point.
djokovic thought rafa had lost 2 matches here at the french 
obviously can see into the future
obviously can see into the future
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539