Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
add your message here
yes please
yes please
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 9
|
By:
lay the little nadal at 1.4
|
|
By:
h2h is not good for seppi, plus nando hit some kind of form (beating nadal), better watch first set and see if nando is on or off.
|
|
By:
nadal beat himself on a slippy floor
|
|
By:
yes, i saw that match, nadal was terrible, but still nando played very good.
|
|
By:
seppi played very good v fed. 3.4 is massive
|
|
By:
?
i thought seppi lost 6-1 6-3 something vs fed? he played well against isner and wawrinka at rome, he actually got lucky against wawrinka in the tb, however hes at better form than verdasco |
|
By:
let's see what we have since 2008
Andreas Seppi [25] TOP 5 -> [ 1] ( 4%) wins, [ 22] ( 96%) loses. TOP 10 -> [ 2] ( 14%) wins, [ 12] ( 86%) loses. TOP 20 -> [ 9] ( 41%) wins, [ 13] ( 59%) loses. TOP 50 -> [ 25] ( 40%) wins, [ 37] ( 60%) loses. TOP 100 -> [ 56] ( 62%) wins, [ 34] ( 38%) loses. Fernando Verdasco [16] TOP 5 -> [ 6] ( 18%) wins, [ 27] ( 82%) loses. TOP 10 -> [ 6] ( 35%) wins, [ 11] ( 65%) loses. TOP 20 -> [ 22] ( 65%) wins, [ 12] ( 35%) loses. TOP 50 -> [ 63] ( 64%) wins, [ 36] ( 36%) loses. TOP 100 -> [ 68] ( 74%) wins, [ 24] ( 26%) loses. player's caliber is little bit different, isn't it? |
|
By:
Well of course, hence the price.
|
|
By:
head to heads:
6 a 0 for Verdasco |