COMBO - FEDERER + DELPO + AZARENKA + TOMAS is cool

im always amazed that people betting multiples are even admitting doing so.

8/05/2012 7:44:14 PM - 6 Leg Multi Bet


Leg 1 - 8/05/2012 8:10:00 PM - Victoria Azarenka vs Andrea Hlavackova - Match Betting - (Total Game Score) Over
$2,034.41


Leg 2 - 8/05/2012 8:20:00 PM - Carlos Berlocq vs Marcel Granollers - Match Betting - (Straight) Marcel Granollers @ 1.80
-

Leg 3 - 8/05/2012 8:20:00 PM - Pablo Andujar vs Alexandr Dolgopolov - Match Betting - (Straight) Alexandr Dolgopolov @ 1.52
-

Leg 4 - 8/05/2012 8:50:00 PM - Denis Istomin vs Fernando Verdasco - Match Betting - (Total Game Score) Over
-


Leg 5 - 8/05/2012 9:35:00 PM - Simone Bolelli vs Ricardas Berankis - Match Betting - (Straight) Simone Bolelli @ 1.50
-


Leg 6 - 8/05/2012 10:20:00 PM - Milos Raonic vs David Nalbandian - Match Betting - (Straight) Milos Raonic @ 1.47

but good luck anyway

paid $2034

yes,sorry, I realise it was an old bet, I meant good luck in the future doing multiples. Do you always have 6 legs to them, and if say 4 have won is it possible to then lay leg 5 in the match odds market to cover a loss.

jjjjj, I am new to betting on multiples and was only asking a question, dont be so rude

well Isnt that true

as far as multiples go that looks pretty good. how much do you stand to win?

First and most significant problem with multiples....you can't trade out if someone gets injured/ loses the plot mentally/ etc.

Second problem....a bad run can go on for far longer than your bank can sustain. Recouping losses is a typical 'gambler' strategy and relies on being a bit lucky. Not good.

If you can sustain even a miniscule profit for a year with this strategy i'd be HUGELY surprised.

I wish you good luck though....no-one like to see others lose.

why are you guys all being such pr*cks?!?  at no point did he say that multiples are a sound long term betting strategy. of course they blo0dy arent!! he simply asked for an opinion on the selections, and sounds like hes having a bit of fun with his betting. nothing wrong with that.
too many self righteous idiots on these forums who think they are gambling masterminds. you can be pretty sure that the chumps like Marquinhos and jjjj who are gobbing off here there and everywhere are massive net losers anyway! tw*ts of the highest order.

great call man, congrats!

@whats wrong with multiples?

nothing is wrong, but multiple = x single

for example multple 3 games (A B C) odds 2.0, stake 100
multiple=100x2x2x2= 800 (100 your stake, 700 win)

if u bet same games as solo bets.. u have same win, because
100 x 2 = 200
200 x 2 = 400
400 x 2 = 800
game over,

ofc, if games are played in same time.. multiples are solutions how bet them all, but if games are not in same time, u can get better odds with X.. singles, because mostly singles has better odds - pinnacle or betfair).

imho... if u have free time watch your bets... solo bets > multiples

tester is correct, only way to justify multi bet is if everything is at the same time

the king is still in huge profit..dont mock him..I told you guys if you lay everything mouginhos predicts you will be a millionaire