|
By:
Someones done his nut today.
|
|
By:
Fixed to who?
|
|
By:
Shouldn't the odds on Baghdatis have been too low after the first set, rather than too big if you want to take the odds as a sign for a fix? Baghdatis kind of won sets two and three, didn't he?
|
|
By:
If you answer that question with "uuuh, yeah right. D'oh", but still feel the need to report it, the Tennis Integrity Unit is the place the contact. Google it.
|
|
By:
I'm taking three things from this thread...
I am trading tennis since 2010 Joined: 02 May 12 cause this is not fair ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
yes he won the match,but more than a million was backed on a high odds after losing the first set.He was doing nothing at all on the court in the first set.He was losing points purposely!
|
|
By:
What was actually fixed?
Many of us wrote that Brown price is shame,b4 set! And Baggy won? |
|
By:
review the case with Davydenko and Vassallo from 2007 and you will understand how they fix the game
|
|
By:
Davydenko (favourite) won the first (odds on first set winner rise) - Baghdatis (favourite) lost the first (odds on first set winner lower)
Vassallo-Arguello (underdog) wins the 2nd set - Baghdatis wins 2nd set Davydenko (favourite) retires during the 3rd set - Baghdatis (favourite) wins the match in 3 sets Completely different, aren't they? How do I understand from the Davydenko match how they fixed Baghdatis-Brown? |
|
By:
poor fishing/turbo moron.
1.5/3 |
|
By:
Brown played a brilliant first set that would have beaten any top 10. And fair play to Baggy for getting back in, unlike that w@nker Tsonga
|
|
By:
omg
|
|
By:
okey guys I can be wrong but really my opinion is that the game was fixed.I reported at Tennis Integrity Unit and Betfair and hope there will be investigation at this game!
|
|
By:
If it was fixed Baggy would be too low and not too high after he lost the 1st.
|