Halep has a Chaos Factor of 42.35%. That means over 42% of all her matches in the last year have ended with an unexpected or inconsistent result (eg if she is the favourite, she loses... and if she is the outsider she wins). Haleps Chaos Factor is one of the Top 3 (most unpredictable/ inconsistent players in the Top 100 WTA)
Halep has a Chaos Factor of 42.35%. That means over 42% of all her matches in the last year have ended with an unexpected or inconsistent result (eg if she is the favourite, she loses... and if she is the outsider she wins). Haleps Chaos Factor is on
1)Halep plays better in the season 2)Halep was in the final here last year 3)Medina had leg injury at AO, after that her best results were 2nd round in some tourneys 4) Last year they met in Estoril it was 7-6 7-6 Medina, but Halep last year and now are 2 different players.
1)Halep plays better in the season2)Halep was in the final here last year3)Medina had leg injury at AO, after that her best results were 2nd round in some tourneys4) Last year they met in Estoril it was 7-6 7-6 Medina, but Halep last year and now are
Medina Garrigues Chaos Factor was 27.5% up until early April. That's about mid-range. The lowest (and therefore most predicatble on the WTA is Schiavone (19.23%) which means she wins when she is supposed to and she loses when she is supposed to. The model of consistency. The worst (and therefore most inconsistent) is Flavia Pennetta. Her Chaos Factor is 46.29% up until early April. Everyone else falls in betweeen somewhere, but Halep is right up near the top. Hope this is useful...
Medina Garrigues Chaos Factor was 27.5% up until early April. That's about mid-range. The lowest (and therefore most predicatble on the WTA is Schiavone (19.23%) which means she wins when she is supposed to and she loses when she is supposed to. The
the drawback with stats like those are they can't cater for sudden increases/decreases in form, like halep, mona, kuz, bepa. su=ince doha, halep has only lost once to someone outside the top 10, that's way above the level she was playing at before.
the drawback with stats like those are they can't cater for sudden increases/decreases in form, like halep, mona, kuz, bepa. su=ince doha, halep has only lost once to someone outside the top 10, that's way above the level she was playing at before.
I totally agree! The Chaos Factor I mentioned doesn't take into account surface, current form... or any of that stuff. It perhaps suggests which players are the unpredictable ones (female Davydenko's) I don't make any great claims. I just shared a little bit of research I'd done. I tend to use the info to get an idea on who is most likely to lose the match (choke/melt-down etc) if I'm unsure.
I totally agree! The Chaos Factor I mentioned doesn't take into account surface, current form... or any of that stuff. It perhaps suggests which players are the unpredictable ones (female Davydenko's) I don't make any great claims. I just shared a li
Annabel tried to go shot for shot with Halep. Total failure. Sometimes you have to wonder about the intelligence of these WTA players.
Not a single drop shot by Annabel and constant attempts to play the Halep backhand which made no sense at all. from game 4 (on serve) is was clear who the winner would be
Annabel tried to go shot for shot with Halep. Total failure.Sometimes you have to wonder about the intelligence of these WTA players.Not a single drop shot by Annabel and constant attempts to play the Halep backhand which made no sense at all.from ga
wow that's some beating she gave a good oppo. can't see any of the other 3 giving her any kind of a match. halep nailed on for the title with 18" nails
wow that's some beating she gave a good oppo. can't see any of the other 3 giving her any kind of a match. halep nailed on for the title with 18" nails