Tennis
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Almagro takes it.
Show More
zamorano
25 Feb 12 21:51 Joined: 12 May 05 | Topic/replies: 23,021 | Blogger: zamorano's blog
almagro doesnt want to defend a final here
thats why
Rubbish.
25 Feb 12 21:51 Joined: 12 May 05 | Topic/replies: 23,021 | Blogger: zamorano's blog
almagro doesnt want to defend a final here
thats why
Rubbish.
He doesnt have to defend a final here if he wins it.
Almagro has won more matches than he has lost from this position. But so has Wawrinka.
fukcing idiot with the smash...
he should break his shoulder like an idiot for doing that...
he should break his shoulder like an idiot for doing that...
A friend just told me that Spain did not want to win the football World Cup, because now they have to defend it next time.
Tennis is not about ranking points. Yes, players play tournaments because of them, but ranking points get them somewhere - they get them into the big tournaments etc. Otherwise, the players are not bothered about them. What they play for is money. And if they get to the top, to be famous.
Almagro wins 250 tournaments on dirt when they can't possibly add anything to his ranking points - Nice last year - clay 250s/500s are what he does.
almagro is a mug who plays to be famous like the first option. He also said it.
He's not going to say he plays for the money though is he?
better ranking points better money, u r seeded play less start in 2nd rounds,
ranking points r very important
ranking points r very important
Nadal play tennis because his life is all about tennis. He play tennis like a way of life not to be famous.
do u have a job S&A? you go to work by the money or because you love your job?
whats wrong in saying "yes, i do my work because the money"
whats wrong in saying "yes, i do my work because the money"
Almagro is not going to say 'I dont want to play a final because then next year I have ranking points to defend'. He is going to say 'I want to win everything, and getting to a final makes me a lot of money.'
He is also going to shout 'towel' angrily at ball kids and gesture to the crowd in a rude fashion too.
He is also going to shout 'towel' angrily at ball kids and gesture to the crowd in a rude fashion too.
ranking pts more important in wta as they will have a greater bearing on sponsorship earnings than in atp. Wd say the priority for the majority of pros is 1) grand slam win, 2) cash, 3) chasing world number 1 ranking, 4) average tourney wins
and most important u play lesser players than u more often when u higher in the ranks instead otherr way round so u earn more money anfd getting more points
if u not getting points u slump into nowhere and its difficult to comeback
if u not getting points u slump into nowhere and its difficult to comeback
a hold from +0-30 is all almagro brain needs to fart..
That wasnt brilliant from Almagro, it was stupid from Wawrinka.
hold from 30-0 down and bp saved
everything is pointing to a almagros brain fart next...
everything is pointing to a almagros brain fart next...
the lob was pretty good, dont u think?
waw should have won the point earlier.. yes...
waw should have won the point earlier.. yes...
awful point
he **** in his pants in this point
waw was done
he **** in his pants in this point
waw was done
wawa should voley into open court instead to mugro racquet stubborn mug
Almagro errors like that could cost him the match.
I think he is trying to push Almagro back, because thats when the Spaniard hits most of his errors.
That was a nothing shot, Almagro should have got that over the net!
if almagro doesn't break now he will be broken in the next game
pretty sure it was long
almagro conceded it
strange...
almagro conceded it
strange...
Commentator - 'what a way to hold serve'
To zero is much better, I think.
To zero is much better, I think.
i absolutely have to be missing something here. . . . 3.5 at advantage and still on serve. market has to be wrong here but I'm being a bit cautious. . . .
uffff thought wawa would choke that
goood is mugro on the other side of net
goood is mugro on the other side of net
Commentator - 'what a way to hold serve'
To zero is much better, I think.
That proves you dont know a lot about tennis
in a close match you would think that hold to love is better because the other player cant break you.
reality is that at this point of the match, a hold saving bps (virtual mps) can give you the extra you need to win and depress the other player with the chances lost
tennis is ALL about momentums.
To zero is much better, I think.
That proves you dont know a lot about tennis
in a close match you would think that hold to love is better because the other player cant break you.
reality is that at this point of the match, a hold saving bps (virtual mps) can give you the extra you need to win and depress the other player with the chances lost
tennis is ALL about momentums.
zamorano, none of tennis is about that. You really think that it is better to hold serve in a deuce game than to 0?
Thats it Almagro, punch your fist and glare at Wawrinka. Does nothing for your reputation in the game.
lol, he is a wee scr0te.
Greened out small 5 mins ago but still fancy waw here
Greened out small 5 mins ago but still fancy waw here
I think Wawa is smoking again, he's been spitting all over the court 
at 6-4 3-6 3-3 final set if you say me:
- you are going to hold serve 100% sure, just tell me the way you prefer
a) hold to love
b) hold saving 2 bps in a 10 minutes game
i will go ALWAYS for b
- you are going to hold serve 100% sure, just tell me the way you prefer
a) hold to love
b) hold saving 2 bps in a 10 minutes game
i will go ALWAYS for b
so in terms of holds, is that a better hold than a hold to love but not as good as a hold saving bp's? 
wwrinka is little bit blind isnt he.....and getting darker
and if the score is 6-4 3-6 *5-6
i will go ALWAYS for b, ALWAYS.
i will go ALWAYS for b, ALWAYS.
thats all about the boost of confidence that you gain when you save bp in the final set
always better hold to love zamorano, which one takes the odds lower?
Feb 25, 2012 -- 4:26PM, asdasf wrote:
always better hold to love zamorano, which one takes the odds lower?
don't think the argument is from the betting/odds perspective
the betting/oddss prospective reflects what's happening in the game, am I wrong?
rite children. . . pros and cons of both. Save energy and mental fatigue holding to love but fini the game more pumped up if you hold having saved a few bp's. It's more the manner of how the points were won that is important. All UE's from opponent or pulling out some huge winners
almagro said: 'I haven't said anything about you' or something quite similar
The other players evidently don't like Almagro.
not only wawm tipsa had a few half a meter off the line 
Somebody backed 1.66 at D there for a few K
tipsa is mugging recently,hes good material for a propper mug
but wawrinka... u just know he will fecking mess up, u just know
but wawrinka... u just know he will fecking mess up, u just know
will eat my laptop if mug has the balls to step up & break here
Feb 25, 2012 -- 4:38PM, elgreco wrote:
will eat my laptop if mug has the balls to step up & break here
with Wawa you know it will happen, just a matter of time
all because mentally wawa was broken after failing to convert the bp in the previous game
can assure u wawrinka would be broken even he would take that break point lol
all because mentally wawa was broken after failing to convert the bp in the previous game
and people still doubting about ALWAYS better in such situations to hold serve saving bps than hold to love
and people still doubting about ALWAYS better in such situations to hold serve saving bps than hold to love
Says the man who thought Almagro didn't want to make the final..
i lost money with almagro once again today.. big money if you ask me
and yes, still thinking he should have lost today.
and yes, still thinking he should have lost today.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539