Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
jimmy69
06 Feb 12 12:03
Joined:
Date Joined: 11 Apr 01
| Topic/replies: 19,231 | Blogger: jimmy69's blog
Will she tank? That is the question...

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 16
By:
nofx
When: 06 Feb 12 12:24
why is that the question? she's a superstar now? it's too low for me but that's beside the point
By:
jimmy69
When: 06 Feb 12 12:29
The thing is she doesn't need to win...
By:
minimou
When: 06 Feb 12 12:53
why doesnt she need to win?
By:
jimmy69
When: 06 Feb 12 12:55
Because someone has pulled out of the main draw and she is the highest seed left in qualifying...
By:
edy
When: 06 Feb 12 12:55
DrewLilley Drew Lilley
Kanepi withdraws with right shoulder injury. I presume lucky loser takes her place. Brianti (0-5 down to Barrois) could benefit #opengdfsuez
By:
edy
When: 06 Feb 12 12:57
mind you, even though Drew Lilley says Brianti could benefit, she is only the 3rd highest seed left. If either Barthel or Mattek-Sands lose they will take the lucky loser spot over Brianti
By:
edy
When: 06 Feb 12 13:01
So basically Barthel will play for an additional 8 ranking points and if she fancies the qualifier spots on the draw more than Kanepi's spot. At least I think as a lucky loser she would directly take Kanepi's place without any shuffling in the draw.
By:
nofx
When: 06 Feb 12 13:04
ah Jimmy i didn't know about Kanepi, cheers
By:
mercs
When: 06 Feb 12 13:11
One of the wonders of women's tennis! I think Barthel will want to go through automatically as I don't see much difference in being the lucky loser as the route is similar...
By:
edy
When: 06 Feb 12 13:15
ATP has exactly the same lucky loser rules...
By:
LernhardBanger
When: 06 Feb 12 13:21
Looking fwd to this 1!
By:
jimmy69
When: 06 Feb 12 13:33
Mattek can lose now too!
By:
edy
When: 06 Feb 12 13:38
So that's two now....Will Jankovic make it three?
By:
mercs
When: 06 Feb 12 13:46
how i love the fact that having serve means nothing in the women's game. one break does it in the men's game usually, this one is on course for three of the first four games...
By:
edy
When: 06 Feb 12 13:51
Of course it means something ffs. It means you will lose the game! So not much different from two argentines playing each other on a clay court.

If we don't count the freak results like yesterday Lisicki-Kvitova where they went....21 (?) straight games without a break of serve.
By:
nofx
When: 06 Feb 12 14:20
10 holds yes now that was an exceptional fluke!, especially given their respective matches prior to it when they weren't convincing on serve to say the least
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com