Tennis
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
07 Sep 08
22:46
Joined:
Date Joined:
30 Sep 05
i'll give $100 to everyone on this thread if he does
Show More
don't bother counting me in, Fed will have this all wrapped up in 4 hours
TTS, Don't come away with some pretentious P I S H just to get a reaction. To make that statement tells me you are a sad bar steward. Lets get behind the brit and hope he humps fed.
Swiss my butt. You another saddo that think your national footy team are still the best in the world. Wake up. You are an average bunch still livin of off 66 when you manipulated all your games to be played at Wembley, however not been sighted in international competition since :) Happy days
i can assure you.....i am not English by a long shot
hehe....(nothing wrong with being english really) but.......LOL not me
hehe....(nothing wrong with being english really) but.......LOL not me
go on then, as many have said, it would be rude not to put my name into the ring, although I think we have as much chance of England beating Croatia 6.0 on Wednesday as we do seeing any return
Signing in. I'll forward my moneybookers address a week from now.
this is gonna becostly at some point
dont think hell win wimbledon
il be down almost as much as you if he does
laying murray to win the grand slams has been a great money train the last couple of years
especially when fed was losing to haas and the scottish muppet was favourite to win the french
had a little scare in last years us open
but thankfully the great man came through for me
dont think hell win wimbledon
il be down almost as much as you if he does
laying murray to win the grand slams has been a great money train the last couple of years
especially when fed was losing to haas and the scottish muppet was favourite to win the french
had a little scare in last years us open
but thankfully the great man came through for me
TTS your the best
but Murry is young and improving
This isnt your style
but Murry is young and improving
This isnt your style
theres a reason he looks over 35 at 23
I think he reached his "peak" in 2007-8
slow decline from now on
I think he reached his "peak" in 2007-8
slow decline from now on
Because there is so much hatrid for Murray on the basis that
1) He doesnt appear to be a particulrly likeable person
2) His game is very negative.
People on here make there case blinded by emotion. They would be better off arguing in a more objective manner as I agree he is unlikely to win a Slam, and here's why...
Hard Court - He might confess to being his fav surface , but after beatings by a number of more aggressive players I very much doubt he can go the whole way in 5 set matches over a slam - Del Potro, Federer, Cilic, Verdasco etc etc all have ability to beat him on this surface.
Clay - Sure he's improved but no where near the game to win here.
Grass - This is the interesting one and why I say he is unlikely rather than "never will". At the next Wimbledon Murray will be in the top 4 players who can win the tournament as a huge proportion of players cant play on the surface and therefore rule themselves out of the tournament by default. Dont get me wrong Fed is head and shoulders above Murray however, Fed is not getting any younger and if Fed didnt play Wimbledon one year then there is a very good chance that Murray would go off Fav - unless Nadal springs back to life.
So my conclusion is an unlikely winner but be wary of Wimbledon.
1) He doesnt appear to be a particulrly likeable person
2) His game is very negative.
People on here make there case blinded by emotion. They would be better off arguing in a more objective manner as I agree he is unlikely to win a Slam, and here's why...
Hard Court - He might confess to being his fav surface , but after beatings by a number of more aggressive players I very much doubt he can go the whole way in 5 set matches over a slam - Del Potro, Federer, Cilic, Verdasco etc etc all have ability to beat him on this surface.
Clay - Sure he's improved but no where near the game to win here.
Grass - This is the interesting one and why I say he is unlikely rather than "never will". At the next Wimbledon Murray will be in the top 4 players who can win the tournament as a huge proportion of players cant play on the surface and therefore rule themselves out of the tournament by default. Dont get me wrong Fed is head and shoulders above Murray however, Fed is not getting any younger and if Fed didnt play Wimbledon one year then there is a very good chance that Murray would go off Fav - unless Nadal springs back to life.
So my conclusion is an unlikely winner but be wary of Wimbledon.
here's my conclusion
90%+ of people are stupid and dont have a clue
players develop/progress/improve/and learn
people said nadal would never do anything at wimbledon or on hard courts after he lost to gilles muller at wimbledon in 05 and got smashed by blake at the us open, he changed his game on these surfaces and learnt from his defeats...those people were stupid
people also said federer was too mentally weak to do it in slams after he lost to luis horna in the 1st round of the french open in 2003 as he had been talked about for a while but not done anything, and then the real idiots said he was finished when he was struggling before the french open this year.....
so basically, murray has plenty of time, he has enough talent and the more than enough drive so anyone who categorically states he wont win a slam or probably wont is an imbecile...he has things to work on, minor things and im sure he is/will...he has 7/8 years to win a slam, his best chances will obviously come in 2010/11/12/13....
the shrewdies also predicted he wouldnt win a slam before 2010, they have been proved right, and im sure these people also thought he would win numerous slams, i doubt much has changed in their minds
90%+ of people are stupid and dont have a clue
players develop/progress/improve/and learn
people said nadal would never do anything at wimbledon or on hard courts after he lost to gilles muller at wimbledon in 05 and got smashed by blake at the us open, he changed his game on these surfaces and learnt from his defeats...those people were stupid
people also said federer was too mentally weak to do it in slams after he lost to luis horna in the 1st round of the french open in 2003 as he had been talked about for a while but not done anything, and then the real idiots said he was finished when he was struggling before the french open this year.....
so basically, murray has plenty of time, he has enough talent and the more than enough drive so anyone who categorically states he wont win a slam or probably wont is an imbecile...he has things to work on, minor things and im sure he is/will...he has 7/8 years to win a slam, his best chances will obviously come in 2010/11/12/13....
the shrewdies also predicted he wouldnt win a slam before 2010, they have been proved right, and im sure these people also thought he would win numerous slams, i doubt much has changed in their minds
i'm still going to be right, idiot or not
$200 for those who post which he will (he wont) win
$200 for those who post which he will (he wont) win
j simpson talks sense - he would have to retire in january to have no chance of winning a slam and i cant seethat happening - tennis is his life and winning a slam is his lifes ambition - - -he will become more attcaking just like mr federer and i reckon he will win a few.......... at least 15.....:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
takethestand 17 Dec 22:10
i'm still going to be right, idiot or not
$200 for those who post which he will (he wont) win
yes but youre missing out on the key fact here...
whether you are right or wrong is immaterial, you will still be an idiot/complete tool
i'm still going to be right, idiot or not
$200 for those who post which he will (he wont) win
yes but youre missing out on the key fact here...
whether you are right or wrong is immaterial, you will still be an idiot/complete tool
signing in for my dosh........ if he ever wins ;)
his only chance US oPEN ....
too hot in Australia...and he will never beat Roger on grass..
too hot in Australia...and he will never beat Roger on grass..
ty takethestand ill have 100 please
i actually like the players between davydenko and tsonga to win the AO (without davydenko but including tsonga) if you look at the betfair ofer. Verdasco, Roddick, Soderling, Cilic, all have good odds and the tools
Ah,ok. Bad spelling is SO unattractive,I'm sure you agree..........
GET IT READY SON 
Paypal address :
neverindoubt@gmail.com
Paypal address :
neverindoubt@gmail.com
Sep 9, 2009 -- 6:20PM, takethestand wrote:
happy aniversary$200 from now on
It gets better lads - $200 each
I remember this from 4 years ago. Well get it right up ye! Clown born every minute.
"i'll give $100 to everyone on this thread if he does "
+1 to this thread. There was no time limit in the T&Cs.
+1 to this thread. There was no time limit in the T&Cs.
$100 please - though I don't really need it having won so much on Murray today 
Technically speaking this bet is not free munney.. Winning a Grand Slam means winning all four major tournaments in the same calendar year. The last person to do it in men's singles was Rod Laver in 1969
Probably has more slams than author has pennies to rub together (nap)
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539