Politics
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
22 Sep 26
16:03
Joined:
Date Joined:
11 Aug 21
Donald Trump at the UN, it's the way he tells them 
Show More
That was the name decided by followers on Truth social. What have you got against truth?
before he used the term si thousands of si domain names were registered.
he cannot force the tech bros to use the term but he issued an executive order that all federal departments use the term super Intelligence specifically si and that they no longer use the term ai.
it looks like yet another corrupt way to make money for his inner circle.
he cannot force the tech bros to use the term but he issued an executive order that all federal departments use the term super Intelligence specifically si and that they no longer use the term ai.
it looks like yet another corrupt way to make money for his inner circle.
The tech gurus have already been calling it SI.
https://x.com/Acyn/status/2105040415942652262
/
https://x.com/Acyn/status/2105040415942652262
/
I wouldn't call AI "super intelligent". Beating humans at Chess of scrabble doesn't count. Neither does solving mathematics or physics problems when a human helps train the machines to do these problems, which have actually already been solved (more slowly by humans). And coming across as autistic in conversation is also a fail for the machine.
A hint of super intelligence would be if the AI could give successful horse racing selections for tomorrow's racing and does this without any prompting. By that I mean the machine, out of the blue, asks to be able to place bets on some horse races and asks the human to lend it money to do so.
As I see it, none of the machines do anything spontaneous and just solve irrelevant problems designed by their programmers. AI is only dangerous when people believe there is something in it. That is, that they believe the AI hype.
A hint of super intelligence would be if the AI could give successful horse racing selections for tomorrow's racing and does this without any prompting. By that I mean the machine, out of the blue, asks to be able to place bets on some horse races and asks the human to lend it money to do so.
As I see it, none of the machines do anything spontaneous and just solve irrelevant problems designed by their programmers. AI is only dangerous when people believe there is something in it. That is, that they believe the AI hype.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHw6yoyPkpo
/
Can't seem to post anything these days without it being submitted to the mods.
/
Can't seem to post anything these days without it being submitted to the mods.
I was half expecting them to reveal at the end it was the guy sitting in the chair that was the AI and the woman on the screen was the human.
Spot on marksman.
They are looking to develop intelligent machines, but they are not there, yet.
Time saving for sure, but error prone and
ability to tell lies.
Programming machines to hack other machines
seems to be asking for trouble, especially when they prove to be good at it.
They are looking to develop intelligent machines, but they are not there, yet.
Time saving for sure, but error prone and
ability to tell lies.
Programming machines to hack other machines
seems to be asking for trouble, especially when they prove to be good at it.
AI can only do what it's programmed to do.
The Waymo car is very impressive but it's all machine learning and super fast computing.
The Waymo car is very impressive but it's all machine learning and super fast computing.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539