New Statue in Trafalger Square

I've just had a look, it's in keeping with our image as a laughing stock.

Blends in lovely with the bright yellow Filth deterents

A load of Bollards ?

cue the easily triggered woke right, here comes some outrage.

lol

Why are they called .. Diversity Barriers

You might want to look up the definitions of 'ridicule', and 'outrage', hth.

^^

Stringvest 12 Sep 26 13:57 
Why are they called .. Diversity Barriers

...........................

That's an easy one. Because we never needed, or had, them, prior to the diversity being imposed on us.

Do they have Diversity Barriers in Savile Town

No diversity there, no need for barriers.

Just looked a a photo of it. All I can say is What the F*** is that and what has it to do with

the battle of Trafalgar?

It's evidently called 'everywoman'. Just happens to be black,
and coincidentally was made by a black woman.
Khan's London, nuff sed.

It's an artistic impression, somewhat symbolic, I quite like it.

It would be less incongruous in the Tate Modern.

Yes, I would question the location in a more traditional setting, the Tate is where it should be on display.

The Fourth Plinth was left empty for more than 150 years after money ran out for an equestrian statue of William IV.


William IV was King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and King of Hanover from 26 June 1830 until his death in 1837.

Thank you 24/7 Forum bore ..The king of google 

Rupert Lowe has sparked a debate over public art after taking aim at the newly unveiled sculpture in Trafalgar Square, describing the work as “filth” and suggesting that removing it could become part of Restore Britain’s London mayoral campaign.


The Restore Britain leader took to X to share an image of Lady in Blue, the latest artwork to occupy the Fourth Plinth, alongside a strongly worded message about the sculpture.


Lowe wrote:

"I am tempted to run Restore Britain's entire London mayor campaign on tearing this filth down."




Has String's real identity been revealed ?

Lowe wrote:

"I am tempted to run Restore Britain's entire London mayor campaign on tearing this filth down."

That's full on woke right isn't it?

Some overly entitled, jumped up 'politician' doesn't like a piece of "art", can't walk on and just enjoy the stuff he likes and let others do the same.

He has to try to stop other people looking at it because he doesn't like it.

Escapee

12 Sep 26 13:56
cue the easily triggered woke right, here comes some outrage.

lol

^^That turned out true

What planet are the woke right living when they think the most important issue to london is removing a tempoarary statue?


If Restore do as they say and Run their mayoral campaign on that issue and I'll donate a box of tissues to the campaign.

Looks like only one person is triggered on here

Calm down Norman, listen to mother .....

No doubt Escapee and a few of the lads on here ,have been throwing a roving eye at this fantastic sculpture

Easy for he main man to ' turn a blind eye ' .......

Sep 13, 2026 -- 3:13PM, DixieDean60 wrote:

Rupert Lowe has sparked a debate over public art after taking aim at the newly unveiled sculpture in Trafalgar Square, describing the work as “filth” and suggesting that removing it could become part of Restore Britain’s London mayoral campaign.The Restore Britain leader took to X to share an image of Lady in Blue, the latest artwork to occupy the Fourth Plinth, alongside a strongly worded message about the sculpture.Lowe wrote:"I am tempted to run Restore Britain's entire London mayor campaign on tearing this filth down."Has String's real identity been revealed ?

Dixie 

Its on a two year contract , any chance of a transfer window .....