From what I have seen so far it was very well organised, police obviously trawl social media, but this time it seems they were caught unaware, for the numbers involved it is quite alarming.
From what I have seen so far it was very well organised, police obviously trawl social media, but this time it seems they were caught unaware, for the numbers involved it is quite alarming.
Nah, it's a move to obfuscate the question of who is responsible for ensuring electoral integrity and MP's standards.
Worked well for Boris's ABBA party.
Nah, it's a move to obfuscate the question of who is responsible for ensuring electoral integrity and MP's standards. Worked well for Boris's ABBA party.
Somewhat ironic how crypto was designed to be anonymous and allow people to trade freely away from the prying eye of the state, yet a crypto billionaire cant find a way to slip a politician a few million quid without everyone in the country knowing about it
Somewhat ironic how crypto was designed to be anonymous and allow people to trade freely away from the prying eye of the state, yet a crypto billionaire cant find a way to slip a politician a few million quid without everyone in the country knowing a
complete myth that crypto was designed to be anonymous.
It's a public blockchain, every bitcoin transaction from the year dot is there to see on thousands, maybe millions of computers.
If you want your bitcoin to be anonymous you have to 'wash' it in much the same way as any fiat currency.
complete myth that crypto was designed to be anonymous. It's a public blockchain, every bitcoin transaction from the year dot is there to see on thousands, maybe millions of computers.If you want your bitcoin to be anonymous you have to 'wash' it in
Most of the actual hard, "caught red handed" evidence that the pertinent donations in question broke money laundering laws comes from Bitcoins blockchain.
The evidence is irrefutable, the only way out is to obfusecate who is responsible for holding him to account.
Most of the actual hard, "caught red handed" evidence that the pertinent donations in question broke money laundering laws comes from Bitcoins blockchain.The evidence is irrefutable, the only way out is to obfusecate who is responsible for holding hi
On that basis, do you therefore think Ben Delo should not be giving away his fortune to good causes as per the following ?
Philanthropy In 2020, he co-founded the Sheila Coates Foundation, which supports students with autism in Britain.[3] In 2025, he funded the Ben Delo Fellowship at the London Institute for Mathematical Sciences.[17] In 2026, he gave £25 million to his autism charity the Sheila Coates Foundation,[18][19] and pledged an additional £20 million to the London Institute for Mathematical Sciences.[19]
He has pledged to give most of his fortune away in his lifetime, so why shouldn't he support a political party ? As he has said , he just wants Reform to be on a level playing field with the big established parties, who obviously are petrified of such a prospect.
A ridiculous analogy Nobby. On that basis, do you therefore think Ben Delo should not be giving away his fortune to good causes as per the following ?PhilanthropyIn 2020, he co-founded the Sheila Coates Foundation, which supports students with autis
Donny's trying to come to terms with his footy team not being able to spend the money they have in order to compete, due to the regulations favouring the cartel of clubs at the top who already have a "locked in" advantage.
Which is rather ironic given Reform are now potentially facing the same kind of problem
Donny's trying to come to terms with his footy team not being able to spend the money they have in order to compete, due to the regulations favouring the cartel of clubs at the top who already have a "locked in" advantage. Which is rather ironic give
Surely its time to carry out Checks on all union Members making Donations , Wonder if there are any Wrong uns among them ?
take a bit of time to do , But needed IMO
Surely its time to carry out Checks on all union Members making Donations , Wonder if there are any Wrong uns among them ?take a bit of time to do , But needed IMO
Yep be plenty more in the rank and file , they need to prove they are worthy of Donating ,IMO, Labour wouldn't want Terrorist supporting types Donating Funds , would they ?
Reform need to bring this to the fore , who knows what Groups or Individuals are hiding under the Union Cloak > hope Mr Burnham has Money to carry out all these checks ?
Yep be plenty more in the rank and file , they need to prove they are worthy of Donating ,IMO, Labour wouldn't want Terrorist supporting types Donating Funds , would they ?Reform need to bring this to the fore , who knows what Groups or Individuals
It's workers, out of their wages, so very easily checked but yep check all them online donations to refuk plc, crypto from Russia sneaking in to disrupt UK.
The nonce bonnet wearing crypto fascists need their donations checked too.
It's workers, out of their wages, so very easily checked but yep check all them onlinedonations to refuk plc, crypto from Russiasneaking in to disrupt UK.The nonce bonnet wearing crypto fascists need their donations checked too.
Another bit of fantasy where you project your feelings onto the forum.
Take a chill pill, crack open a jar of caviar and wesh it doon with a wodka
Vlads payin
Another bit of fantasy where you project your feelings onto the forum.Take a chill pill, crack open a jar of caviar and wesh it doon with a wodkaVlads payin
I have worked in a factory which was a closed shop. I had to agree to a deduction from my wages in favour of the union. No doubt they and the Labour party would call it a donation, I call it extortion.
I have worked in a factory which was a closed shop. I had to agree to a deduction from my wages in favour of the union. No doubt they and the Labour party would call it a donation, I call it extortion.
This is becoming like the new proportional representation for the left.
When the Greens split the left and reform were topping the polls it was we don't like FPTP and it should be reformed.
Now Reform are getting the big donations it's unfair lets cap it.
This is becoming like the new proportional representation for the left. When the Greens split the left and reform were topping the polls it was we don't like FPTP and it should be reformed. Now Reform are getting the big donations it's unfair lets c
The hypocrisy of Labour and their acolytes laid bare for all to see.
They want to pull up the donations drawbridge now that Reform are going to benefit from a huge funding boost.
But since 2000, Labour have received £135m alone from just three unions . They also received £4m from an offshore hedge fund in 2024. Massive double standards, but only what one has come to expect from this cowardly bunch in government, who are basically "merde effraye" of Reform.
Dale Vince, who chucked £5m to Labour a couple of years ago to "help level up the playing field", now thinks all such donations should be banned for all parties. Shame you were not saying that in 2024 Mr Vince. No more levelling up allowed for the likes of Reform then eh ?
The hypocrisy of Labour and their acolytes laid bare for all to see.They want to pull up the donations drawbridge now that Reform are going to benefit from a huge funding boost.But since 2000, Labour have received £135m alone from just three unions
The questions remains the same “why did foreign crypto lads donate to reform “ Reform were caught out proposing crypto Sensible answers please I think it strange
The questions remains the same “why did foreign crypto lads donate to reform “Reform were caught out proposing crypto Sensible answers please I think it strange
If reform say we think crypto is way forward in future then that’s grand but make that your”e policy and donations from crypto lads will help us do that. Nobody has any problem with that but I think it’s strange, but in fairness I know very little about it, I won’t be buying a greyhound in crypto next year. Thankfully
If reform say we think crypto is way forward in future then that’s grand but make that your”e policy and donations from crypto lads will help us do that.Nobody has any problem with that but I think it’s strange, but in fairness I know very litt
They want to pull up the donations drawbridge now that Reform are going to benefit from a huge funding boost.
Err, no, the pretend donations came months after the law making process was set in motion.
And the investigations into farage continue.
Refuk trying to go against the will of the people.
They want to pull up the donations drawbridge now that Reform are going to benefit from a huge funding boost.Err, no, the pretend donations came months after the law making process was set in motion.And the investigations into farage continue.Refuk t
Lord Sainsbury of Turville is Labour's largest ongoing donor, giving over £21 million since 2010, with 53% to Labour and 47% to the Liberal Democrats, including a single £8 million donation to the Lib Dems in 2019. In 2026 alone he donated £1.32 million to Labour (Co-op), placing him in the top 5% of donors by total value
Lord Sainsbury of Turville is Labour's largest ongoing donor, giving over £21 million since 2010, with 53% to Labour and 47% to the Liberal Democrats, including a single £8 million donation to the Lib Dems in 2019. In 2026 alone he donated £1.32 m
What's clear from the "anti-establishment" party supporters on here is:
A) They want to keep the establishment status quo of cash for questions/peerages/Vip Lanes/contracts.
B) They say Uni-Parties are corrupt, so it's ok for "our" party to be corrupt.
Reform UK? But lets not change anything.
What's clear from the "anti-establishment" party supporters on here is:A) They want to keep the establishment status quo of cash for questions/peerages/Vip Lanes/contracts.B) They say Uni-Parties are corrupt, so it's ok for "our" party to be corrupt.
Donny, the fact remains that Labour want to backdate a law that isn't even in place yet. To their advantage. Voters will see through this.
How are Reform "going against the will of the people" ?
Donny, the fact remains that Labour want to backdate a law that isn't even in place yet.To their advantage. Voters will see through this.How are Reform "going against the will of the people" ?
Escapee proving once and for all that he is anything but the "unbiased" contributor he tries to paint himself as.
Facts - Reform have already made it clear that there will be no "reciprocal" advantages for these donors. No peerages like some Labour benefactors get. Delo certainly isn't on the make - he has given chunks of his fortune away to charities and good causes and is on record as saying he will carry on doing so.
Escapee proving once and for all that he is anything but the "unbiased" contributor he tries to paint himself as.Facts - Reform have already made it clear that there will be no "reciprocal" advantages for these donors. No peerages like some Labour be
The £72 million donation is just to seize the narrative and divert it away from the original topic of this thread...
A crime of money laundering regarding a £1million gift has been committed, there is a "bang to rights" evidential paper trail showing the law was broken and who broke it.
And now the crime has been forgotten.
Happy days for clacton man.
The £72 million donation is just to seize the narrative and divert it away from the original topic of this thread... A crime of money laundering regarding a £1million gift has been committed, there is a "bang to rights" evidential paper trail showi
the fact remains that Labour want to backdate a law
Fairly standard to be able to start laws on date legislation was brought to Parliament.
No backdating beyond that day.
Why did refuk wait so long to try to counter the law, that was in effect already in place given Labour majority
Easy for idiots to not understand.
the fact remains that Labour want to backdate a lawFairly standard to be able to start laws on date legislation was brought to Parliament.No backdating beyond that day.Why did refuk wait so long to try to counter the law, that was in effect already i
But the legislation isn't in place yet is it ? Senior Labour figures are trying to amend and strengthen it, to the detriment of their opponents.
If they try to stymie other parties in such a manner it will come back to bite them in the future when a right wing government gets back in.
But the legislation isn't in place yet is it ? Senior Labour figures are trying to amend and strengthen it, to the detriment of their opponents.If they try to stymie other parties in such a manner it will come back to bite them in the future when a r
When a bill is started with action to take effect from date it is brought to Parliament then this is clearly stated in the bill.
Anybody seeking to circumvent the bill by acting in advance of it passing into law will find the bill applies to their actions.
Pretending they don't understand this just makes them look silly,...
As for threatening what a right wing party might do.. Well that's as good a reason as any to not vote for them...
Parliament is sovereign, and can pass whatever laws it wants. Scary to think what abuse of power might bring.
Reply removed, lolWhen a bill is started with action to take effect fromdate it is brought to Parliament then this is clearlystated in the bill.Anybody seeking to circumvent the bill by acting in advanceof it passing into law will find the bill appli
Well we have been and are seeing some of your last sentence with the current government.
"As for threatening what a right wing party might do.. Well that's as good a reason as any to not vote for them..."
And the same is true with Labour, only there's no might do, they are actually doing such things. So every reason not to vote them in again.
It would be tit for tat, if the left try to stymie the opposition when they are in power, then why should they not expect the same if the right win the next election ?
Well we have been and are seeing some of your last sentence with the current government."As for threatening what a right wing party might do..Well that's as good a reason as any to not vote forthem..."And the same is true with Labour, only there's no
Lol, you threatened what a far right government would do, and compare to legitimate legislation
You really are deranged, having celebrated the donations before you understood the law.
Whoops
Lol, you threatened what a far right government would do, and compare to legitimate legislationYou really are deranged, having celebratedthe donations before you understood the law.Whoops
How on earth can i "threaten" anything you halfwit
I never celebrated the donation, just pointed out how the left would react and BINGO !
How can one "understand" a law that isn't even in place yet ?
If there's a night school near you that teaches English comprehension then i would suggest that you enrol.
The Durham Dunce is at it again.How on earth can i "threaten" anything you halfwit I never celebrated the donation, just pointed out how the left would react and BINGO !How can one "understand" a law that isn't even in place yet ?If there's a night s
If there's a night school near you that teaches English comprehension then i would suggest that you enrol.
I've no need for night school, lol, is that what you dunces attend
If there's a night school near you that teaches English comprehension then i would suggest that you enrol.I've no need for night school, lol, is that what you dunces attend
Do you ever have an original line to come out with ?
Donny the Plagiarist has a nice ring to it, almost as apt as the Durham Dunce
The previous point stands - how can I actually threaten anything ? I am not a politician or even a member of a political party.
Do you ever have an original line to come out with ? Donny the Plagiarist has a nice ring to it, almost as apt as the Durham Dunce The previous point stands - how can I actually threaten anything ? I am not a politician or even a member of a politi
You doesnt have to mean you will do it yourself you can threaten what others will do
If your English was a bit better you wouldn't need to be laughed at as often.
- how can I actually threaten anything ?You doesnt have to mean you will do it yourselfyou can threaten what others will doIf your English was a bit better you wouldn't need to belaughed at as often.
The irony of your third sentence after the mangling of the English language in your second one is priceless
Night school beckons for Donny the Plagiarist (you couldn't even spell that word correctly in your previous post ).
The Durham Dunce moniker really is richly deserved.
The irony of your third sentence after the mangling of the English language in your second one is priceless Night school beckons for Donny the Plagiarist (you couldn't even spell that word correctly in your previous post ). The Durham Dunce moniker r
Sentence 2 does NOT make sense, as it is devoid of any punctuation
They might teach you how to use commas and apostrophes, as well as the correct application of speech marks if you enrol for classes.
Sentence 2 does NOT make sense, as it is devoid of any punctuation They might teach you how to use commas and apostrophes, as well as the correct application of speech marks if you enrol for classes.
You doesnt have to mean you will do it yourself you can threaten what others will do
It should have read as follows ;
"You" doesn't have to mean you will do it yourself, you can threaten what others will do.
HTH
Your original sentence was ; You doesnt have to mean you will do it yourselfyou can threaten what others will doIt should have read as follows ; "You" doesn't have to mean you will do it yourself, you can threaten what others will do.HTH
Lol, you can claim whatever you want but accusing me of plagiarism for quoting your posts shows how thick you are, so simple claims, unsubstantiated, except in your own mind are little things pleasing little minds.
Great that it's a stand you want to take on a thread about refuk corruption. Stopping the thread falling down the pile.
We still havnt forgotten, nor that you didnt understand how the law worked.
Err, lol.
Lol, you can claim whatever you want butaccusing me of plagiarism for quoting yourposts shows how thick you are, so simple claims, unsubstantiated, except in your ownmind are little things pleasing little minds.Great that it's a stand you want to tak
Jeez you are tiresome, constantly regurgitating the same old guff. No originality at all, just typing "lol" and idiot" time after time after time. How sad.
If you can't c & p from the Guardian or X you are devoid of anything new to say.
Cue another pointless response with his favourite words .....
Jeez you are tiresome, constantly regurgitating the same old guff. No originality at all, just typing "lol" and idiot" time after time after time. How sad. If you can't c & p from the Guardian or X you are devoid of anything new to say.Cue another po