You said that all of the "hate" was completely Murdoch generated - so take your pick.
If you are going to paint yourself as "open minded" when your very words actually betray you , why should i play along ?
Again, I'm going to post thisYou can't name a single thing you hate him for dixie
so you whine about me instead
Here's your golden oppotunity to shine dixie, name a single thing you hate him for that is his fault?The day i am jealous of you will never dawn. And anybody has the freedom to criticise who they like so don't play that record.
And you accusing someone of repetition when you spend your day doing it really takes the biscuit. You are like a 24 hour bout of hiccups with your "woke right" silliness
FFS, if it will shut you up, how's this for starters
Taking millions from us for the wedding and then doing a runner because she who must be obeyed doesn't actually want to do the things expected of her as a royal.
Labelling half the country racist. Labelling an unnamed royal as racist.
Making the last couple of years of the Queen's reign much more stressful than she deserved by their disgraceful behaviour in trashing the royal family for money.
Trying (unsuccessfully) to sue certain parts of the press out of spite.
Claiming that they left these shores in order to have some privacy and then doing everything in their power to maintain a high profile and shouting LOOK AT ME ME ME at every opportunity. Fecking hypocrites.Taking millions from us for the wedding and then doing a runner because she who must be obeyed doesn't actually want to do the things expected of her as a royal.
The day he was born, £millions were going to be spent on his wedding 20 odd years later, not his fault.
Doing a runner because his misses told him to, did he tell you that or did murdoch tell you that?
My guess, just a guess, is that his mothers death whilst trying to do a runner might also be a factor.Labelling half the country racist. Labelling an unnamed royal as racist.
Did he tell you that or did murdoch tell you that?Making the last couple of years of the Queen's reign much more stressful than she deserved by their disgraceful behaviour in trashing the royal family for money.
#
as if you cared!?Trying (unsuccessfully Grin) to sue certain parts of the press out of spite.
He sued the bloke who tapped into milly dowlers phone and hence delayed the investigation by days, and WON.
You're facts are completely wrong and your reference to 'spite' is a self projectionClaiming that they left these shores in order to have some privacy and then doing everything in their power to maintain a high profile and shouting LOOK AT ME ME ME at every opportunity. Fecking hypocrites.
So They're both *shallow and fame hungry, 'like' chasers with a golden ticket, who don't realise how lucky they are. Such is life, there are winners and there are lottery winners.
Look at yourself, hating on reality TV stars like a teenage girl.
Murdochs going to have fun fun fun with you.
*shallow, hey he stood firm holding the moral high ground against murdoch and won.
if you don't understand what an achievement that is, you've got mush for brains.So you have an open mind and yet immediately disagreed with everything i just wrote, You are a liar, liar, liar. You had anything BUT an open mind.
I give you my reasoning but you try and make out "thats what Murdoch says" - Incorrect of course but exactly what i predicted you would say. You are a clown.
If his mothers death was the reason for doing a runner how come he didn't do so before his costly wedding, only some time after ?
Did you watch the interview with Oprah ? did you read the excerpts from his fairy story, oooh sorry i meant biography ? did you follow the costly court case that he spectacularly LOST against the Daily Mail last month ?
Doesn't seem so unless you have selective memory loss (again). Now whose facts are wrong ??????Dixie, You've got spark, but you've lost it.
Why are you forced to unquestioningly defend and support 50-75% of politicians?
You've given away your spark to a group of politicians and said "here you are, I'll support you 100% no matter what you do."
Take your spark back off these conmen.
No politician is so worthy that everything they say or do is beyond question or criticism.They're a couple of reality tv stars, you're getting played by a media mogul and a couple of reality TV stars.
Take your spark back off these conmen.All leave has been cancelled at the Daily Mail.Supposedly Murdoch forced them to choose a multi million pound Netflix deal and swan off and live on Millionaires row in So Cal. Sounds terrible.
It must have been hard for them and now they have done Oprah Winfrey and everyone has lost interest it’s understandable they want to come back and be on with Alan Carr and Graham Norton.Let's hope they keep their rants to this one thread.
Well done dixie, nice and early reaction.Just like the TDS and NDS sufferers do with their rants?One thing I discovered recently is magaloons love to talk about imaginary diseases, they find them very funny.
But if you call them (TDS,NDS etc) imaginary diseases, they suddenly stop laughing and find the concept very unfunny.
Suggest that their favourite party should publish a policy to set up a "Ministy of Imaginary Deseases", and they get triggered
They will have Storm and Alexis' slot on Channel 5 by ChristmasBurnham Says they are Nowt to do with him ,and wishes them Good Luck , Nee security payments available , well done Andy , they can pay for their own Security ,if requiredKids are enrolled in schools and the King knew nowt? They really think
the public are stupid enough to believe it, perhaps they are
Weird how a prince who fought in Afghanistan gets more hate thrown at him on here than the Prince that's a pdough
Must be the birds of a feather syndromeThe Oprah gig was disgraceful and unforgivable tbf, though you seem to have forgiven it.Bang on Bearcub,he fought for his country against the terrorist threat.The bear of little brain returns with yet another untruth.
Tthe other prince he speaks of got pelters on here, obviously he must have been in hibernation when he was the headline
Lapsy, the ginger one deserves praise for his military service but that does not excuse his behaviour since he married PP.
Consider the fact that he always seemed "normal" to joe public and was the most popular royal (even more so than her maj) prior to his decision to leave these shores.Rough enough gig though,he couldn't scratch his ha rse and it would be all over the media.He made his bed when he left this country and started trashing it.
They allegedly wanted "privacy"But have done everything to keep their names in the headlines ever since. Hypocrites.
Yip.
He got a lot of sympathy regarding media intrusion at a certain time.
But signing media deals with massive media companies like Spotify and Netflix did suddenly make that wear off.A lot of toys being thrown out of the pram between JA, 'Arry and even pamphlets, amazing scenes.You were no doubt defending him dixie like you defended the pdoughs Trump and Liddle
Nice treble thatA lot of toys being thrown out of the pram between JA, 'Arry and even pamphlets, amazing scenes.
Let’s all cry about Palestine instead.Lapsy - it's not up to you what is considered suitable for discussion on here. If you don't like the subject of a thread then just stay clear. Simple
bearcub with the square root of eff all to say again. I can't stand the ex prince either but i dare say you'll make something up to the contrary, it's your way.Any Pamphlets been handed out over in Eire PA ? I hear they may be neededAh diddums
What sort of adult says these things to another adult?
Do you lefties actually use these ‘ah diddums’, ‘groovy gang’ and ‘Kool aid’ phrases when you are out in public conversing with other people or have you just spent too much time on social media with teenagers that you think people speak like this on forums so you have to as well?When things are summed up perfectly with comedy...
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YNp8UYJfnHQNot a great fan of the entitled royal family, however despite the money it’s not a life I would like, sympathy is the wrong word but I appreciate their is problems having that life they were born into.
However I don’t understand the right wing press hatred of Prince Harry, it’s obsessive and way over top in my opinion.
Now if you don’t like the royal family it should be them all not just one profile one.
Is Harrry hated for racism against his wife and his children?Racism ? By who , not heard much about racism regarding any of them ? Where you getting that from ?As far as I am aware his Children are white , What race are you saying Meg is ?
I think your the only one seeing race here, If its them you are talking about ?It's like saying if you don't like one footballer, or bus driver, you should dislike them all
Speaking of Footballers I remember Lineker saying he received Racial abuse , I cannot work that one out at All ,At first i thought he may be Jewish when he said itMalay - try reading the first page of this thread to see some reasons why the ginger one and his other half are disliked.
The other members of the Royal Family haven't left these shores and then started trash talking have they ? One huge reason why they are not disliked as much as the errant prince.Dont see where the race comes into it , My Mrs has a darker complexion than Megan
Megan is a American is she not ?I thought there was something about from members of royal family talking about skin colour, I may be wrong I’m no expert on British royal family, as said previously I have nothing against them, I think hero worship of that institution is strange behaviour but people are entitled to their own beliefs and what gives them satisfaction in life.Malay - try reading the first page of this thread to see some reasons why the ginger one and his other half are disliked.
As dixie mentions, try rereading the first page and have a chuckle as all the haters realise they don't know why they hate them, they couldn't think of any reasonable reason other than regurgitating murdochs bile.The other members of the Royal Family haven't left these shores and then started trash talking have they ? One huge reason why they are not disliked as much as the errant prince.
That's a good point dixie, they haven't have they?
They only person I can think of who did that recently is Farage, Trash talking the UK to congress and the american media. And as you point out Farage is not a member of the royal family even though he's a count.It is alleged that a member of the family wondered what shade an offspring would be.
Do you think the crime is in wondering about that, or wondering out loud?No crime at all but if you are wondering about thes things, the question can be asked Why does that bother you ? The most important thing for any family should be incoming child’s health IMOWhy does wondering about something imply that it bothers someone? Anyone
who says the thought wouldn't occur to them is highly likely to be lying.Who says the child's good health wasn't everyone's prime consideration Malay ?
Just because at least one person also wondered about what the baby would look like, doesn't mean that was all they cared or talked about does it.
I would suggest it is a perfectly normal thing that is discussed when a mixed race relationship couple are expecting. And hardly racist to do so.
Escapiddle completely losing the plot again, waffling about Farage when we are discussing the RF.
Escapiddle completely losing the plot again, waffling about Farage when we are discussing the RF Crazy.
You bought up the subject of people who go to america and trash talk the UK.
I'm getting the impression you wish you hadn't.
Dixie could you explain why the right wing press appear to hate one section of royal family so much ? We will leave skin colour or mixed race out debate.
Do you not agree the negative press is excessive? The guy is not Hitler ffs.Malay - because he took the goodwill of the British public (and a sizeable contribution from the taxpayer to his wedding costs) and threw it back in their face by trashing the RF from abroad in his disgraceful memoir, as well as generally slagging the country off . The distress he caused the Queen in her final years was unforgiveable.
Had he just disappeared to the USA to live a private and peaceful life with his wife and kid (as he kept saying he was going to do) rather than doing the exact opposite, then he would have doubtless retained the affection of people here. Remember, there was a time not that long ago when he was even more popular than her majesty. HE only has himself to blame for how things have gone in recent years and his defeat in the courts a couple of weeks back was richly deserved for the hubris he displayed alongside his luvvie fellow complainants.
Escapiddle - au contraire you numpty, this thread is about ginge and PP in case you hadn't noticed. i,e the very people who went to the USA and trashed us.
FYI Farage is not a member of the Royal Family. HTHHe has brought Farage into the Nepal disaster thread as well Dixie , ObsessedHe said he was glad to escape this racist country, and actually called his plane trip a 'freedom flight'.
Fair enough, there is mutual dislike, that's life. He's the one crawling back now, why should that make
people here like him again? He's made his bed, let him lie in it.TBH I think the whole royal shebang ran its course when the Queen Died , Chaz more suited to a Court Jester Role imvhoNobody is perfect lads and I can assure you I’m not president of Harry fan club, if he died tomorrow of salmonella I would not give one F, but I do not think he deserves the negative press, putin has allegedly threatened uk with serious weapons and sections of uk press hate the ginger prince more than putin.
Just my opinion I will leave it at that.He has brought Farage into the Nepal disaster thread as well Dixie , Obsessed
No I didn't, never mentioned him. Go have a look again
I just agreed with you and said £5million was peanuts you could barely buy a second rate polititian for that in the UK.
(I'm only mentioning ITT because of tons mentioning it and obviously misunderstanding ITT)Do you not agree the negative press is excessive? The guy is not Hitler ffs.
Had a good go at it once didn't he?Do you not agree the negative press is excessive? The guy is not Hitler ffs.
Had a good go at it once didn't he?
As far as I remember: He dressed up as a N**i for one (or more?) parties.
As with EVERY fact, one has to contextualise it, and of course all the woke right hate me for putting facts in context on here. But hey ho, Only losers bet on facts without context and this is a betting forum and therefore like it or not, facts will get contextualised.
so.
As far as I remember: Several witnessess have said clacton man used to goose step around his college uttering unPC remarks in a manner akin to your implied smear, which he descibed as youthful fun or something of that nature.
Should we hate on harry but give clacton man a free pass for mildy different shades of the same distasteful behaviour?
Is this the two tier "policing" the magaloons bang on about?Maybe if I put a smiley face at the end, you may have seen it as the joke that I intended. I must do betterDifficult for anyone not to take it as a joke other than Escapee who was obviously having another feverish bout of FDS at 3am this morning.
Maybe he will have slept it off.The Royals bore me to tears, not an Anti Royalist just completely nonplussed by such a painfully outdated and irrelevant establishment, I generally switch off as soon as they're mentioned and cannot believe how much press attention they get given, I know nobody who's interested in them yet the coverage they get seems way way disproportionate to how relevant and how in-demand they actually are in 2026. It's like living in some bygone era where the country hung off their every word and appearance pre Television and mass media, but we know that's not the case especially given how multi cultural we've become over the last 60 years. Why is that, are the media legally bound to keep them in the spotlight ?
It is weird. It's not like any of us can relate to them, they're upper class, mix in high society and live in a parallel universe that none of us will ever visit. But they're also completely untalented and say nothing of interest. The only reason why huge crowds are drawn for weddings and public events etc is because of the passing interests of snap happy tourists.
The level of hate and contempt Harry gets has clearly been amplified by the Pro Royal Family media in an attempt to consolidate their phantom importance in the public's psyche as Harry began to distance himself from them, by making sure everyone's against Harry it by default tightens whatever bond and feeling some people think they have with the Windsors, at least that's what the Press believes.
Do you think the average person today, i.e the current and next generation having grown up with social media, are on tiktok, instagram and facebook searching for the latest tittle tattle stories on the Monarchy FFS, give me a break, they want to see the latest dance crazes, reviews on Charlie xcx's latest album, what Taylor Swift is wearing and what's she's currently up to, it's just the small greying population left like the old boys on this forum that may have some kind of lingering interest, but once you're gone, that's about it, the Royals luck will run out and tax payer funds funneled their way will dry up before they're all farmed off to the country and forced to get real jobs to live in the real world as should be the case in the 21st Century.
Kind Regards.mes, todays younger generation won't be young for ever will they ? When they grow up and ditch the Taylor Swift stuff then they will doubtless view the world in a different way. If we had a referendum on abolishing the monarchy i doubt many U25s would even bother voting. When they are older they probably would do.
From a balanced article a couple of years back :
If Britain ever did decide to get rid of the monarchy, it would be a constitutional matter requiring legislation from parliament. Even before that, it would need to be endorsed by the British public through a referendum, which would have to be called for by the government (just as the Brexit referendum was). If such a vote were held today, polling from June suggests that the country would opt to keep the monarchy by a significant margin. And Britain wouldn’t be alone in doing so. Although previous referendums have led to the abolition of the monarchy in Italy and Greece, they have also reaffirmed support for the institution in Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway, and Spain.
With the monarch gone, Britain would need a new head of state, as is required in almost all parliamentary systems. This would most likely be in the form of a President, a role that already exists in parliamentary systems such as Germany and Italy. This person would have most of the existing responsibilities of the monarch, such as certifying laws, going on state visits, and speaking to the nation in times of national crisis. But an elected head of state would also likely have the responsibility of acting as “a kind of constitutional umpire,” says Hazell—something that a monarch could never be.
Republicanism isn’t a strong force in Britain at the moment, which makes the abolition of the monarchy unlikely for the foreseeable future. But that could change if the institution does, or if it fails to attract the support of the younger British population. Among those aged 18 to 24, support for the monarchy has fallen from 59% in 2011 to just 33% today.the Royals luck will run out and tax payer funds funneled their way will dry up before they're all farmed off to the country and forced to get real jobs to live in the real world as should be the case in the 21st Century.
The owner of the Duchy of Cornwall is going to have to 'get a real job'? How's that going to happen? Are we going to go full Bolshevik and seize their landholdings along with that of the Duke of Buccleuch and Anders Povlsen?Hopefully Harry is there when mes and his fellow Swifties round up the King's family for "disposal" Shrewd
Be very careful going around upsetting Swifties so nonchalantly, you really don't know what they're capable of
The press ran photos of a copy of Archie's birth certificate, they were credited to, and available to buy from, 2
different royal photographers. The photos were both, separately, recorded in the metadata as being taken on May 16th.
The birth was registered on the 17th. They photographed a birth certificate the day before the birth was registered..
Post Your ReplyPlease login to post a reply.Wonder
Instance ID: 13539