Politics
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
That is the latest rumour. Lefties hoping c ock of the north are going to be extremely disappointed. Mahmood would fit in nicely on the right of the tories.
Show More
That's why they probably want her shifted .she has had enuff of the migration caper, lot of the labours cant get enough of these yung chaps in
I'd back her down to 1.5 to stay as home secretary for at least 6 months after (yet another) new PM takes over.
She's making a lot of the right noises and some of the right moves on immigration, and, putting it euphemistically... she's got enough pigmentation to fend off the quiche eaters.
She hasn't stopped the boats, but She's cut immigration, cut the spend on 5* hotels, cut the student dependency asylum seekers and a few other such things heading in the right question.
She's done more than any other home secretary in the last 15-20 years to cut the mass influx of other cultures to UK.
Genuine question:
What's not to like?
Who would you prefer in the the job?
She's making a lot of the right noises and some of the right moves on immigration, and, putting it euphemistically... she's got enough pigmentation to fend off the quiche eaters.
She hasn't stopped the boats, but She's cut immigration, cut the spend on 5* hotels, cut the student dependency asylum seekers and a few other such things heading in the right question.
She's done more than any other home secretary in the last 15-20 years to cut the mass influx of other cultures to UK.
Genuine question:
What's not to like?
Who would you prefer in the the job?
^^ such things heading in the right question
such things heading in the right direction
such things heading in the right direction
Hasn't she doubled from 5 to 10 years and added a load of "Financial stability" clause to the UK citizenship qualification?
On the flipside, I've just remembered shortly after she got the job she publicly declared her first loyalty was to one of the middle eastern book clubs and I immediately thought FFS WAC.
but hey, as with all politicians, look at what they do, not what they say.
On the flipside, I've just remembered shortly after she got the job she publicly declared her first loyalty was to one of the middle eastern book clubs and I immediately thought FFS WAC.
but hey, as with all politicians, look at what they do, not what they say.
She's more right wing than the Tories, when it comes to immigration. I don't forget that Boris opened the doors to ~4,5 million legal migrants who are non-european. The Tories betrayed the british people who supported them. If her ideas are blocked by her own party Reform is going to win the next general election, and Restore is going to grow big. When people voted for Brexit politicians promised less taxes and less migrants, now we have more taxes, more legal immigrants than ever, more illegal immigration, and economic stagnation.
I'm slightly puzzled why the right wing so hated starmer, given that he should get some credit for mahmoods moves on immigration.
Starmers replacement is pretty much an unknown package, and may be less favourable to the right wing.
Starmers replacement is pretty much an unknown package, and may be less favourable to the right wing.
Have laid the Rachael ' done by 30/9 ' at 1.02 a while back . Its the most sensitive of the jobs and we all remember Kwasi . Whats not to like about a few months stability and stick the big beasts in the other two flagship posts if you wish .
Seems as if the rumours are set to move the
meerkat on hear.
Who is next after Mrs Balls.
meerkat on hear.
Who is next after Mrs Balls.
Have laid the Rachael ' done by 30/9 ' at 1.02 a while back
I laid it at 1.03 a couple of weeks back, Parliament is closing tomorrow for an extended break till September , so I figured it unlikely she is replaced before parliament returns.
Yep but think its End Sept market ....fingers xd as bets to nothing really .
Shabana doesn't take shiit from anyone and knows how to get results. She is exactly the person Burnham will need to force through departmental budget cuts.
I think people will be surprised by Burnham. Personally he's not combative. He's more interested in fixing problems than playing the blame game.
Kemi will find it very difficult to lay a glove on him.
I think people will be surprised by Burnham. Personally he's not combative. He's more interested in fixing problems than playing the blame game.
Kemi will find it very difficult to lay a glove on him.
It is all just a farce , a load of useless mps constantly swapping job for which none of them have any experience or knowledge of the latest job they have been given .
What's the financial acumen of mahmood?
Why does anyone care what badenoch will/won't find difficult to do?
Can you lay out the results that mahmood has achieved in her career (aside from getting herself promoted) ?
It is already evident what type of pm Andy Crapp is going to be. Hiding their plans, hiding from scrutiny, gaslighting, ably assisted by his champagne socialist pals and legacy media. Let's see, so far he has appeared for soft soap cosy fireside chats with 'adults back in the room' trot Marr, and far left 'refugees are welcome' vinegar lineker. Starmer gas mark II.
Why does anyone care what badenoch will/won't find difficult to do?
Can you lay out the results that mahmood has achieved in her career (aside from getting herself promoted) ?
It is already evident what type of pm Andy Crapp is going to be. Hiding their plans, hiding from scrutiny, gaslighting, ably assisted by his champagne socialist pals and legacy media. Let's see, so far he has appeared for soft soap cosy fireside chats with 'adults back in the room' trot Marr, and far left 'refugees are welcome' vinegar lineker. Starmer gas mark II.
Shabana ... knows how to get results
What results are these?
3 numbers on the lottery? driving theory test? a levels?
What results are these?
3 numbers on the lottery? driving theory test? a levels?
No place for the staring eyed loonie,Milliband would be a result!
from the bbc
There has been increasing talk of the current home secretary becoming chancellor.
The BBC has been told there are "live discussions" about putting Mahmood in Number 11, while the Financial Times, external is reporting it as a certainty based on three sources close to Burnham.
| UK - Next Ministers -- Next Permanent Chancellor of the Exchequer? |
| 32 Runners £115,038 Matched |
| 121% | 94.8% | |||||||
| Shabana Mahmood | 1.16 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 1.31 | £34,904 | |
| £122 | £93 | £35 | £70 | £112 | £2 | |||
| Yvette Cooper | 5.6 | 6.2 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 19 | £9,658 | |
| £33 | £3 | £25 | £4 | £4 | £2 | |||
| Ed Miliband | 9 | 13 | 13.5 | 26 | 30 | 34 | £28,339 | |
| £2 | £10 | £44 | £4 | £10 | £33 | |||
| Pat McFadden | 27 | 28 | 40 | 180 | 990 | 1000 | £9,971 | |
| £4 | £12 | £2 | £16 | £3 | £1 | |||
| Wes Streeting | 25 | 42 | 55 | 960 | 970 | - | £20,668 | |
| £2 | £5 | £2 | £5 | £1 | ||||
| John Healey | 11 | 130 | 250 | 800 | - | - | £643 | |
| £1 | £2 | £3 | £3 | |||||
| Darren Jones | 13 | 65 | 100 | - | - | - | £2,468 | |
| £2 | £5 | £2 | ||||||
| Miatta Fahnbulleh | 160 | 200 | 250 | 990 | - | - | £343 | |
| £5 | £3 | £3 | £5 | |||||
| Torsten Bell | 4 | 46 | 250 | 920 | - | - | £1,260 | |
| £5 | £2 | £3 | £2 | |||||
| Jonathan Reynolds | 2.02 | 4 | 22 | 190 | 200 | 890 | £1,690 | |
| £10 | £4 | £10 | £2 | £2 | £2 | |||
| Louise Haigh | 130 | 150 | 250 | 1000 | - | - | £377 | |
| £3 | £3 | £1 | £1 | |||||
| Angela Rayner | 300 | 310 | 400 | - | - | - | £94 | |
| £3 | £2 | £2 | ||||||
| Douglas Alexander | 160 | 300 | 400 | - | - | - | £31 | |
| £6 | £4 | £2 | ||||||
| Heidi Alexander | 300 | 310 | 400 | - | - | - | £69 | |
| £3 | £2 | £2 | ||||||
| Lisa Nandy | 260 | 400 | 450 | 1000 | - | - | £73 | |
| £2 | £3 | £2 | £4 | |||||
| Lucy Powell | 21 | 300 | 350 | - | - | - | £45 | |
| £13 | £3 | £2 | ||||||
| David Miliband | 300 | 500 | 1000 | - | - | - | £151 | |
| £2 | £1 | £1 | ||||||
| Ellie Reeves | 44 | 55 | 1000 | - | - | - | £813 | |
| £26 | £20 | £1 | ||||||
| Anneliese Dodds | 4 | 16 | 1000 | - | - | - | £1,444 | |
| £4 | £1 | £1 | ||||||
| Andy Burnham | 500 | 850 | 1000 | - | - | - | £38 | |
| £1 | £1 | £2 | ||||||
| Bridget Phillipson | 300 | 310 | 450 | 1000 | - | - | £93 | |
| £3 | £3 | £2 | £4 | |||||
| James Murray | 200 | 220 | 400 | - | - | - | £14 | |
| £5 | £2 | £3 | ||||||
| Liz Kendall | 4 | 55 | 1000 | - | - | - | £373 | |
| £4 | £3 | £7 | ||||||
| Alistair Carns | 400 | 410 | 1000 | - | - | - | £18 | |
| £1 | £4 | £1 | ||||||
| Nick Thomas Symonds | 10 | 100 | 1000 | - | - | - | £5 | |
| £25 | £5 | £5 | ||||||
| Rebecca Long Bailey | 100 | 110 | 1000 | - | - | - | £6 | |
| £5 | £8 | £2 | ||||||
| Emma Reynolds | 100 | 110 | 1000 | - | - | - | £8 | |
| £5 | £8 | £1 | ||||||
| Peter Kyle | 560 | 570 | 1000 | - | - | - | £1,439 | |
| £1 | £3 | £2 | ||||||
| Alison McGovern | 4 | 5 | 1000 | - | - | - | £0 | |
| £4 | £2 | £7 | ||||||
| David Lammy | 11 | 15 | 1000 | - | - | - | £2 | |
| £1 | £2 | £6 | ||||||
| Emily Thornberry | 11 | 14 | 1000 | - | - | - | £2 | |
| £1 | £2 | £6 | ||||||
| John McDonnell | 11 | 14 | 1000 | - | - | - | £2 | |
| £1 | £2 | £6 |
thee bbc are part of the discussions, so for once, pretty reliable speculation from them
I hope the rumour is wrong. I'd like to see Ms Mahmood to remain as Home Sec to see through her immigration policies. I think former Labour voters like yours truly will be disappointed and very unlikely to vote Labour in the next General Election.
Times thrown a few spanners in the works , very dissy article , hence the 1.30+ .
What is her financial acumen to qualify for this role (genuinely)? Did she work in customer support for a retail bank?
Apparently Ms Mahmood has never made a detailed and cogent financial comment in her political career or as a minister. My own preference is Ms Cooper or even Sir Shameless, no doubt socking for some here.
It doesn't matter who gets what job, the uni-party will continue our managed
decline unless it is removed. Expect more of what we've had for the last 30 years.
decline unless it is removed. Expect more of what we've had for the last 30 years.
Yup, for my part I'm trying to get the liberalists to defend it. Nothing yet.
The current cabinet and ministers may as well be holograms, their role isn't to implement policy but to deflect and defend what others are trying to do. Hence, anyone can do it. No finance knowledge needed (not that they have any MPs that would have deep knowledge of finance anyway).
One can only laugh at the constructed narrative, mahmood for chancellor calms the markets. lolol
The current cabinet and ministers may as well be holograms, their role isn't to implement policy but to deflect and defend what others are trying to do. Hence, anyone can do it. No finance knowledge needed (not that they have any MPs that would have deep knowledge of finance anyway).
One can only laugh at the constructed narrative, mahmood for chancellor calms the markets. lolol
ergo, she's not overtly a marxist communist like the majority of the party (and the brand new hologram). Few !
Yup, for my part I'm trying to get the liberalists to defend it. Nothing yet.
The average liberalist mostly form opinions based on data, and is non partisan, they won't
defend something which is against their principles simply because their preferred party is guilty of it.
E.G.
Liberalists will say all pdfiles should be prosecuted, right wingers will run away from saying that because all the data says their cult leader is a pdfile.
So this is probably why no liberalists have jumped into to defend this less than ideal mess.what is a liberalist?
AI Overview
A "liberalist" (more commonly referred to as a liberal) is someone who advocates for a political or social philosophy centered on individual rights, liberty, democracy, and equality. They generally support civil liberties, freedom of speech, secularism, and the rule of law.
Cider, running the country is not part of the entertainment industry.
HTH
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539