Starmer

Was nice to hear Beethoven's 9th drowning out his pure drivel.

When will we hear from Burnham?

He probably still has a fanboy or two on here.

That resignation speech has to be the biggest piece of easily disprovable nonsense ever heard outside Number 10.

The genocide denier has gone.

Bring on the next genocide denier.

Is that the genocide in the country where the population is rising every year?

Two years of unpatriotic, spiteful, virtue signalling vandalism.

he was useless

F  I  L  T  H

I honestly believe he thought he was doing a good job, hopefully Reeves is the next to go. Another one that should never be near a government position.

Reeves kneecapped Starmer from the get go with her WRP cuts.

Then Starmer confirmed he was clueless by defending the cuts!

Two buffoons together.

https://x.com/MAGAVoice/status/2068993750467240407
/

Pity the Jewess having to spend more time with that cnt.

Currency, bond markets etc seem to have shrugged this seismic news off with a massive ‘whatever’

Former prime ministers should only receive the PM pension and attend the Remembrance Sunday commemorations, Only if they've won a majority and served a full term in office.

That leaves after thatcher, John Major and Tony Blair. The rest are asterisk prime ministers

Odd man decisive yet indecisive. Was very quick TO shut down dissenting voices on the street if they disagreed with what was happening in his Cabinet.  Watched his troops fall in the trenches, yet was not man enough to deal with his cabinet, and was hell bent on helping left wing, benefit riders, and we know there are lots of people we understand need help, maybe for life, however this covid excuse with the young is a joke. If it walked he taxed it via the office lady. He would not listen to the people on the street, the man was in total denial. Now we find out Sweety is stepping aside as well. LABOUR just does not get it, they never listened to the people. GOOD RIDDANCE.  And at the taxpayers expense, you and Burnham have cost the tax payer money, new mayor election, by election and the yearly pay off ex Prime Ministers get every year. Minds me of the sort of guy who go goes to womens drawers to sniff their pantees. And reminds me of the famous line in FULL METAL JACKET.... BY Gunnery Sergeant Hartman....i bet you are the THE KIND OF GUY.....

Mens drawers surely

Who was playing the Music was it Brexit Bray

Are we really going to have a Scouser as Prime Minister, the minions at 10 Downing Street would be well advised to start nailing down all the furniture to the walls and floors straight away imo

Decisive? Who decided on the cold weather payment, the farm tax, closing oil fields, 3 child benefits? Was it him, or one of his terrible Ministers or the Labour MPs blob.? I don't like the direction that Burnham is likely to head in but at least I expect him to impose a bit more control over the rest of the Cabinet.

Never really impressed me on the rare times I heard him speak, but none of them really impress me, made some bad appointments which were ultimately his downfall.
Has to be praised for standing up to Trumpton and keeping England out an illegal offensive, but it was a poisoned chalice taking over UK after the mess the tories left.
But he promised things he didn’t deliver, smashing the gangs, boosting economy, I think they were unrealistic objectives.
GL to new guy, I think he will have his work cut out.

Standing up to Trump

was on his hands and Knees picking his papers up FFS

I know nothing about picking papers up, read what I posted and if you think that was wrong on his stance tell the forum, I think it was correct decision, if you disagree give you’re opinion on why.

What could he have sent MALAY , we have no Army No Boats ,They sent a boat it broke down

Starmer is alright giving it the Big un with his EU mates , look where that has got him

GOOD RIDDANCE .He has single handily destroyed the Labour party , it is a long way back for them

Trumo is the least of our Worries

All this, "Keir was a decent man" bollocks is sickening.

A decent man wouldn't have looked the other way or supplied arms to the Israelis while the IDF slaughtered 22,000 children in Gaza.

He deserves to rot in hell.

Was it not something to do with bases ? Trumpton raging with, I don’t think he wanted England to send soldiers?
Again I know little about UK military capacity but Starmer  wasn’t in the job long enough to be blamed for weaknesses in that surely, I would guess it takes long time to build that up, unless he goes and bought ready made gear off China with taxpayers money and sends to illegal war.
No doubt the you tube lads and daily express would have field day with kind of policy.

He has single handily destroyed the Labour party

Corbyn destroyed it, made it unelectable.
Starmer somehow turned it around (Luck or skill and luck?), got it elected in 2024.

If he'd managed to improve the country as much as he did the labour party he'd be a 10+ year PM.

Corbyn would have won easily in 2024. Notoriously, Corbyn secured more votes in a general election than Starmer did. Hardly pulling up trees is it, 2024 was all about the Tories and pushing them out. It wasn't a positive vote and broadcasters gave Starmer a free ride.

Corbyn secured more votes in a general election than Starmer did.

A meaningless metric given that it was of no tangible benefit to him and he actually handed Boris a huge
win.


His statement: "I have no opinion on Brexit", totally, utterly, completely destroyed the labour party's electability.

It's specifically meaningful, as you are claiming he 'destroyed the Labour party'. Yet got more votes than someone who subsequently won a landslide with fewer votes.

Starmer lucked out and the Tories destroyed themselves. It didn't help long term, as everyone discovered pretty quickly he is a dreadful, incapable leader.

We can expect the king of the north to be similarly exposed. There is a benefit with Burnham, as he is already a proven failure.

One talentless puppet to be replaced by another talentless puppet .

Starmer bottled going into the HoC, sent in Mastermind to report back from the G7 instead (he wasn't there)

he is a dreadful, incapable leader.

Should for once in his life shown some backbone and called a general election , should have been a no brainer

I'm pretty sure it requires a vote in parliament. Labour MPs aren't that stupid.

If my mind isn't playing tricks, for the Brexit election it took the Liberals to vote for an election. Daft as it was.

He could have called a general election , it was changed a couple of years ago .

What's in it for Burnham or Labour to call one?

For Starmer to have called one , even if they lost he would be in the same position as resigning with the benefit of burnham not being pm or mayor , i bet a lot in his position would have called one .

Obviously he has absolutely no mandate to lead the country. It won't stop him, and the sycophantic meeja will be facilitating it.

This must actually be an unprecedented scenario. How long will the emperor retain his clothes.

He does have a mandate though. Labour won the election, not Starmer. This isn't America.


And to be able to call this unprecedented is a bit weird when we've had Brown, May, Truss and Sunak all come in mid-term. Johnson too for that.


Do you even know what the word unprecedented means?

Please do tell me when the last prime minister was anointed without even being a MP the previous month.

Why would he possibly call an election now?

He'd want to spend the next 2-3 years re-building and regathering Labour, helping to restore trust and confidence in the party, letting the country get to know him, what he stands for and his policies, i.e building momentum going into nationwide vote, whilst at the same time chipping away, dampening down and picking holes in the popularity Reform have managed to build in recent years thanks to the collapse of the two-party system, hysteria of small boats crossing the channel plus the fallouts of Brexit and Covid.

Calling a General Election at this moment in time when they're in a position of weakness, is Turkey's voting for Xmas stuff.

Kind Regards.

Or even in parliament.

No fooker even knows what his plans are. I suppose it avoids u turns at least.

Burnham that is, when he takes over.

Kier would not call an election, because he's still a Labour man, and knows there's a good chance they'd be pummeled at the ballot box.

No fukkker even knows what his plans are. At least there are fewer chances of u turns I suppose!

If he follows Starmer's manifesto, what's the point.

What's in it for Burnham or Labour to call one?

If Burnham wants to seriously deviate from Labour's 2024 manifesto then he should obtain a mandate.

Would people vote for a politician who didn't want an enquiry into the grooming gangs? I think not.

Jun 22, 2026 -- 5:09PM, Cider wrote:

Please do tell me when the last prime minister was anointed without even being a MP the previous month.

ah ok.


But you only vote for your MP if you're in their constituency. And they did. What he was doing 10 minutes, months or years before doesn't matter. The country voted for Labour and it's MP's decide on the leader. That's how it's always worked and how it's working now.

Jun 22, 2026 -- 5:09PM, mesmerised wrote:

Why would he possibly call an election now?He'd want to spend the next 2-3 years re-building and regathering Labour, helping to restore trust and confidence in the party, letting the country get to know him, what he stands for and his policies, i.e building momentum going into nationwide vote, whilst at the same time chipping away, dampening down and picking holes in the popularity Reform have managed to build in recent years thanks to the collapse of the two-party system, hysteria of small boats crossing the channel plus the fallouts of Brexit and Covid.Calling a General Election at this moment in time when they're in a position of weakness, is Turkey's voting for Xmas stuff.Kind Regards.

Much as with Johnson, the only reason to call an early election is the belief that you'll win a big majority and extend your term. You don't do it while it's up in the air. If Farage leaves Reform (and I've backed him to do so) I could see him calling one then, but not really before.

Jun 22, 2026 -- 5:36PM, PorcupineorPineapple wrote:

Jun 22, 2026 --  5:09PM, Cider wrote:Please do tell me when the last prime minister was anointed without even being a MP the previous month.ah ok.But you only vote for your MP if you're in their constituency. And they did. What he was doing 10 minutes, months or years before doesn't matter. The country voted for Labour and it's MP's decide on the leader. That's how it's always worked and how it's working now.

obviously it can  be done, doesn't mean it should. the question is why he doesn't have a mandate, I explained why. I didn't say he couldn't be made pm for three years. I am saying he shouldn't.

It's on Labour MPs, many of whom have fallen for the cult of Burnham, with no idea what specific policies he will implement. It goes without saying that the liberalist media have also fallen for the cult.

I'm here for the popcorn (salty variety)

seduced is a better verb.

MP's only have mandates from their constituents.


Parties have it from the country. Labour have that. It hasn't changed.

I'm not referencing some kind of formal mandate. It's not a legitimate one. 

The country has never had a political leader that hasn't put forward their policies for government.

Labour trying to can cancel elections they were going to lose was a new low, now at least it looks like they will beat that one.

It might be that with Burnham, we'll see fresh new lows. Unfortunately, we're all in the dark!

Labour trying to can cancel elections they were going to lose was a new low

Boris proroguing parliament is the new low, not happened in 3 or 4 hundred years AFAIK.

It was in the gift of the pm (until the supreme court created a new law on the hoof)

But it still is legitimate. We do not elect Prime Ministers in this country. We elect parties, and those parties decide on their leaders. Twas ever thus.

RENT BOYZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Biggest Starmer failure,when he won the election and then asked Sue Grey for the plan,and she commented “what plan”

HOLD ALL BETS

Just seen a clip of Beth Rigby in downing street, nauseating stuff.

Starmer says he was going to “Smash The Gangs” instead they smashed him.

For a man who boasted that the Labour Party he created out of the Corbyn disaster was patriotic, "standing proudly with, not against, our national flag", it's very surprising that he hasn't said a peep or even scolded councils actively committed to tearing down our national flags - especially at the time of the World Cop.

Surely he wasn't just having us on and spouting a load of bu**$h!t for idiot journalists to swoon over?

A pathetic shambles this Morning trying to crack Jokes in the House ,unbelievable tbh