Politics
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
17 Jun 26
14:31
Joined:
Date Joined:
11 Aug 21
The reported 14 points are:
01/ Immediate and permanent end to hostilities on all fronts, including Lebanon.
02/ Mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.
03/ A commitment to negotiate a final agreement within 60 days.
04/ Lifting of the US naval blockade and restoration of normal maritime traffic.
05/ Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz within 30 days.
06/ Waivers on sanctions affecting Iranian oil and petrochemical exports.
07/ Restoration of Iran's access to financial resources.
08/ A reconstruction and development plan worth at least $300 billion.
09/ Negotiation of a final nuclear agreement and broader sanctions relief within 60 days.
10/ Iran reaffirms that it will not develop nuclear weapons under the NPT.
11/ No additional US troop deployments or new sanctions during negotiations.
12/ Release of approximately $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets during the negotiation period.
13/ Creation of a monitoring mechanism to oversee implementation.
14/ Final agreement to be endorsed through a UN Security Council process.
01/ Immediate and permanent end to hostilities on all fronts, including Lebanon.
02/ Mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.
03/ A commitment to negotiate a final agreement within 60 days.
04/ Lifting of the US naval blockade and restoration of normal maritime traffic.
05/ Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz within 30 days.
06/ Waivers on sanctions affecting Iranian oil and petrochemical exports.
07/ Restoration of Iran's access to financial resources.
08/ A reconstruction and development plan worth at least $300 billion.
09/ Negotiation of a final nuclear agreement and broader sanctions relief within 60 days.
10/ Iran reaffirms that it will not develop nuclear weapons under the NPT.
11/ No additional US troop deployments or new sanctions during negotiations.
12/ Release of approximately $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets during the negotiation period.
13/ Creation of a monitoring mechanism to oversee implementation.
14/ Final agreement to be endorsed through a UN Security Council process.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 34
|
By:
Surely Bibi ensures it falls apart on point one within a week.
|
|
By:
A 60 day commitment,pull other one
|
|
By:
Surprised the clown hasn't come on here to praise Trump for this deal.
|
|
By:
It's a massive embarrassment for Trump and his deranged, narcissistic lunacy...
The only thing more embarrassing is that within a certain group (certainly not all btw - I know it's standard to assume) of what we currently call left wing politics there's a celebration of Iran getting the upper hand here - and they have... many head wobbles required... |
|
By:
We live in head wobbling times.
|
|
By:
Back to the 'deal' before Operation Epic Fury, never a need for a shot to be fired.
Not so much celebrating the 'upper hand' for Iran really but more a stop to the gallop with Israels 'plans' for the region,nothing at all morally right there. |
|
By:
When the Betair Nazis can't even talk this deal up it leaves me wondering just who won this war?
|
|
By:
Before the conflict China was buying oil from Iran at $5 a barrel and now it's going to have to be sold to Europe. Great news for Europe but I suppose that's a bad thing if you are a cheerleader for China.
|
|
By:
You really think China and Iran aren't gonna work a way around that?
Have you paid any attention to the trade embargo on Russia in the last few years? |
|
By:
If they have to supply more oil to Europe it means less will be available for China and it won't be for $5.
|
|
By:
Magaloons: "Everyone has to pay 50% more for oil to stop china paying $5"
|
|
By:
Removing the China discount makes the price go up for everyone else? I thought I was supposed to be the clown.
|
|
By:
They should have made Trump sign it at Versailles fot the craic......oh wait!
|
|
By:
White House postpones Switzerland deal signing after Iran backs out
JD Vance’s staff were at the airbase ready to fly to summit in Bürgenstock for Iran talks before trip was suddenly cancelled Netanyahu thinks he can carry on bombarding Lebanon. |
|
By:
Netanyahu thinks he can carry on bombarding Lebanon.
You are seeing which group actually hold the cards Take note |
|
By:
' All of Lebanon must burn' ben gvir this morning, they have lost the run of themselves a long time ago.
|
|
By:
Long before you or I Lapsy
This has gone on for centuries mate |
|
By:
Yes CL,there is a potential for peace in the region currently if the Iran deal was implemented well from both sides. A fair 2 state in Palestine needed but not allowed to happen is a lot of what has gone wrong along with 'expansion'.
Maybe if those October elections go ahead it might bring a few change of heads which could only be a good thing. |
|
By:
Republicans need to realise they are the last people standing defending these terrorists. Israel believe they can carry on and America will always have their back. Needs to be a co-ordinated financial message from America and the Gulf States that they are now considered war criminals and all investment is ended. Bring Israel to its knees, then bring Bibi and Ben Gvir to the Hague, and then you might have a chance of peace in the region.
|
|
By:
Kier Starmer is a staunch supporter of Israel, only imposing token sanctions and trying to stop the ICC prosecuting Netanyahu and his genocide buddies the IDF.
Starmer has plenty of blood on his hands. |
|
By:
Some of the problem re other countries being 'quiet' isn't Israels atrocities but an American investment backlash.
|
|
By:
yeah, that's why the onus has to be on America themselves. If this carries on the Gulf States' whole business model collapses, America runs out of oil and the whole global economy collapses. All because Ben Gvir is a massive racist who wants to wipe muslims off the face of the earth. I know we've traditionally supported Israel in general but this is pretty high stakes now.
|
|
By:
Which Republicans are defending the Iranian terrorists?
|
|
By:
(to me?) apols, maybe a deleted post I've missed.
I'll let whoever it was who said they were defending Iran answer. I'm saying they're defending Israel though. |
|
By:
Yes you said Republicans need to realise they are the last people standing defending these terrorists
|
|
By:
ahh ok. I meant Israeli terrorists, not Iranian ones.
sheesh |
|
By:
clown turns up, posts start getting deleted.
|
|
By:
It's only natural to assume you are talking about Iran considering they have funded terrorism for years. I don't know how anyone can side with them. Russia has been using Iranian supplied drones against Ukraine.
|
|
By:
Well I'm happy to correct you.
And I'll let someone who's actually sided with Iran comment on your second bit (might be a while tho). |
|
By:
The way you are calling Israel terrorists and not Iran, who are known for terrorism, is a clue to which side you are taking.
|
|
By:
Didn't know I needed to list all terrorist orgs for the pedantics.
Maybe you've got a list to hand and I can just say yes or no. Very kind of you. |
|
By:
Would you think it fair if they were labelled 'genocidists' or something along those lines Ron?
|
|
By:
I don't think Iran's actions to date meet the threshold of genocide.
|
|
By:
You're right there Ron.
|