DONT MESS WITH DONALD

Donald wants to pick the next Iran LEADER

Must be
King Donald

after King Donald of VENEZUELA

Iran says usa made an
OPERATION EPIC MISTAKE!!!

GTFI

He wants the Strait renamed

Strait TRUMP

King MADNESS

Where were all the king merchants when Fauci was bossing everyone about?

DJT just said
Get the oil from the Strait

hahahahahaha

Wot a ****

T O S S E R

Going to announce he doing a ground invasion of IRAN

Followed by invading Cuba in
May

and then in July
KANADA

Think he is invading the moon as well^

Green Cheese Land, well invade them all, lots
of invasions, big big invasions, the biggest most
beautiful invasions...

The clangers are building a big missiley thing which has the range to hit Ballydehob.
We will open the Sea of Tranquility to all.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION IN THIS MATTER!

The soup dragon will pay huge tariffs if he keeps
supplying the clangers, huge huge tariffs, beautiful
tariffs

im 100% convinced trump is pulling out of iran tonight

an call it a win

He's recently acquired ownership of or control of nigh on 50% of the worlds oil, and he's just managed to shut down
20% he doesn't own and increase the price of oil by 50%.

So I'd say that counts as a win for him, the rest of us 8 billion humans can go forth and multiply.

Trump has to realise
That talking about a thing isn’t the same as the thing itself, even just repeating it.

If he wants a ‘win’ he has to risk loss, something the West is scared to death of these days.
He has to risk losing lives himself….and he has to stop pulling punches
Bombing munitions is fine, but it gives those that remain a belief they themselves are untouchable
If you want rid of a thing, you have to hit it directly, not skirt around the edges.

He's not worried about lives. He's worried about the money markets, about inflation. About the Fed not being able to cut rates four times this year like he planned. Interrupting his round to stand in front of a few hundred coffins is nothing compared to the possibility of him losing the mid-terms and the second half of his scheme to enrich himself and escape punishment is threatened.

last night speech was a nothing burger

nothing new

Yeah, what was more interesting is what was left out. We know he likes to be the centre of attention but surely there was some kind of planned announcement. Withdrawal? Troops? End of NATO. Whatever it was, it got nixed and he was back to his weak attempts to placate the market.

Pam Bondy gone
Probably she diddnt give him a
b job

The DOW is only
46k
NOW

That's a bit rich coming from U.

Doctor TRUMP says
Jesus CHRIST


HAHAHAHAHAHA

https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/2045618308234281382
/
It's amazing how small his hands are on this photo.

Probably hasn't lifted anything in his entire lazy , entitled life.

Well it seems Donald been rejected by army command
who have refused to hand over NUCLEAR CODES

On better news hes suing himself for $10 BILLION DOLLARS
Cos his tax irs info was breached

Well i pay more tax than Donald
which was 750$ in 2020

The settlement of the deal should make interesting reading

You're buying the nuclear codes story? Are you feeling alright?

He has a 67&
DISAPPROVAL RATING

Probably just the wh like him

If you looked at Obama's at the same stage in his second term it would be around the same when you adjust for the extreme unfavourable media.

The mad thing is that independents have a worse opinion of Trump than Dems. The overall number is always a bit of a nothingburger as American politics is generally so partisan. But it's more interesting when you break it down. More than 30% of Republicans are against him (that was never more than 10% for Obama and Dems) while, as said, the biggest haters are independents. Have to wonder which Dem voters are favourable. Would love to hear their explanation.

Donald be sued by the police re the Jan 6 riot

Just hope the jury agree damages of at least 10 billion
DOLLARS

Good time for him to countersue for the fedsurrection.

Donald asking the government to NOW fund his
Private BALLROOM

His donors must have forgotten their cheque BOOKS

Seems DJT sons made $59 million from
NON EXISTENT mobile phones
Trump supporters paid a $100 deposit
For a £499 made in usa phone

Was gold painted i think as well!!!



MAGA must really like him

Donald DUCK
Just announced ANOTHER CEASEFIRE
Must be at least 8 or 9 times
AGAIN

Or is he thinking of his 8/9 war endings

In the latest deal Iran gets to keep all their nukes and they now have control of the Strait of Hormuz!

If that is winning then I want to play poker with Donald J Trump

Why would you want to lose 90% of your stack?

Trump's deal sounds well worse than Obama's. Iran get all their assets unfrozen.

Trial date for bbc 10 billion case set Feb 15 2027

BBC have asked for discovery of DJT Claims
Have issued 47 subpoeans-to identify his wealth and losses sustained

GEDIT!!!

DJT lawyers are crying FOUL-Have NOT cooperated
While bbc has responded to DJT discovery 

Looks like djt has been CHECK MATED

The art of the deal is dead
Iran win the war
They get everything and more
Get to charge tolls to the Hormuz

DJT is a SUCKER/LOSER

It's a classic case of Iran being the clear winner. It reminds me of that time the black knight  was victorious against King John.

World a safer place as no nukes gunna be going off any time soon.....well done POTUS

Sorry
Been told its
J D VANCE plan

Or maybe Magic Johnsun

DJT is in a TRANCE

DJT has issued 250 PARDONS
No sure if munie changed hands

He had no choice about those pardons. If he hadn't promised to pardon them they might not have contributed to his campaign.

Apparently the going rate is
$2 million

PARDON

It's all about providing value.

He's pardoned quite a few pdfiles.

I feel sorry for that 9yo girl, Trump pardoned her abuser after just 6 month in prison.

No one was pardoned by Trump for pdf crimes and he only pardoned JSixers for J6 offences, not for any subsequent offences. Why do lefties have to lie all the time? If Trump was as bad as they make out he is the truth would be enough.

The wives and families of the cops killed on J6 must feel utterly betrayed when POTUS pardoned their killers.

Except no cops were killed on J6.

Well it seems if you want an early look at his truth social
reports
DJT will charge you $100k a month

Who wants to read his lunatic ravings?

Hmmm, possibly some of the 78 million people who voted for him?

Donald Trump threatens to sue BBC for $1 BILLION over doctored Panorama speech as he demands a 'full and fair retraction' of documentary and other 'false and defamatory' statements


Hope no one on here pays for their T V Licence !

This has predictably backfired spectacularly for trump, with the bbc seeking all his financial accounts to disprove his claim to have suffered losses and all material related to his conduct before and after the speech to disprove his claim that the documentary falsely presented him.

How do I know he wouldn't have made 10X the profits if not for the BBC lies? Could be a solid argument.

The Trump crypto will be worth next to nothing before he goes into the wilderness and before court cases against him begin in earnest. Does anyone here have a holding? Do the wise thing...

Ronaldmcdonald • July 25, 2026 12:30 PM BST
How do I know he wouldn't have made 10X the profits if not for the BBC lies? Could be a solid argument.

lol that's exactly why the bbc are seeking all his financial records. And the other info to prove that they weren't lies.

And then when the case gets dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the beeb can publish all the financial records and Jan 20th records it obtains.

and the fact that the 'impartial' BBC put out doctored video footage doesn't concern you at all?

Sounds like desperation to me and quite pointless. It's impossible to prove he made more, less or the same profit than he would have made without the BBC lies, it can only be based on an estimate. How would proving that he made a profit prove the profits still didn't suffer yugely because of the BBC's dishonesty? It's a nonsense argument.

It wasn't doctored, it wasn't libelous, and it didn't do any damage to him at all.


Trump can always testify about what he did and didn't do in the days surrounding J6, he can always testify about any damage that video caused.

But he won't, you know it, everyone knows.

It's impossible to prove he made more, less or the same profit than he would have made without the BBC lies

You're agreeing, he has no case.

Escapee 25 Jul 26 13:48 
It wasn't doctored

Of course he has a case, hopefully this will finish the BBC. Why anyone would take the side of the BBC, who covered up for Savile, Harris and Hall for 40 years is beyond me. Lefties are bonkers. They would still be covering it up now if they could get away with it.

Yep, until he testifies what he actually said, it wasn't doctored.

you can scweam and scream about his innocense, just like mandy, andy, starmer et al,
But everyone knows it's all bluster and BS, if he was legally wronged he can
testify in court.

He won't, he knows it wasn't doctored.

Of course he has a case, hopefully this will finish the BBC. Why anyone would take the side of the BBC, who covered up for Savile, Harris and Hall for 40 years is beyond me. Lefties are bonkers. They would still be covering it up now if they could get away with it.

In your previous post you said he had no case.

No one in the Florida saw the footage unless they used an obscure vpn (bbc blocks vpns on i-player) and provided false details to breach copyright. So Florida has no jurisdiction. 

The "editing" merely involved truncation of the speech and it's arguable whether that gave a misleading impression. Hence the discovery request for relevant Jan 20th documents.

yes escapee the clown excelling himself:

It's impossible to prove he made more, less or the same profit than he would have made without the BBC lies

Of course he has a case

The editing gave a completely false narrative, that was it's intention. To deceive through manipulation.

The BBC are not impartial and  dont deserve licence payers funding and should be  become self funding to help  restore media parity in uk.

The apology is in effect an admission of guilt and they  should pay dearly.

Their intention was to use the 'we didn't edit to mislead' defence.
They've had to abandon that, hence the new defence route.

utter nonsense.

They have made zero pronouncements about defence. They asked for the case to be dismissed because the court had no jurisdiction as no one in Florida could legally view the documentary. The judge said it was too early for these arguments. bbc then proceeded to discovery. Trump said his business interests were damaged in the suit. So bbc have asked for the relevant business records. the bbc have also asked for details of trump's activities on the day of the riot as they are clearly relevant to trumps claims that the edit damaged him.

This case won't go to trial. trump will do his usual stalling by appeals against the discovery motions and when he loses he will drop the case rather than provide info far more damaging than anything in a documentary shown 1000s of miles away.

All those words will not convince me, they know they are guilty and would lose if they simply denied malicious editing.

The editing gave a completely false narrative, that was it's intention. To deceive through manipulation.

If you are correct then Trump will have no hesitation in pursuing it thru the courts to it's full conclusion, thus proving you are right.


If I am right, Trump won't even provide the documentation to the court that every litigant must provide to be examined in court let alone testify in court.


Your man is a fugazi in every sense of the word.

It's legally the moment in time to put up or shut up, we all know he's going to shut up.


P.S.
Did you believe Mandy & Andy when they feigned innocense , and threatened to sue?
(Just asking to see where you are on the mug-o-meter scale)

His case is performative virtue signalling without any *substance, and look how many of you have fallen for it hook, line and sinker.

*Substance: as in evidence he, as plaintiff, must provide to the court prior to the hearing.


He's going to bluster and fuddle, you're going to scweam and scweam, we're going to laugh.

#goBBC, #WinItForUK

You...Kay...You...Kay...You...Kay...You...Kay...You...Kay... Go BBC, Win it for the UK.


Look at all the fake UK patriot refuk roundabout painters ITT... all on America's side.


#goBBC, #WinItForUK

shout it with me lads, You...Kay...You...Kay...You...Kay...You...Kay...You...Kay...

Oh dear, you've got the illness bad.

Note that I never said it's impossible to meet the legal standard of "reasonable certainty".

If for example Mar-a-Lago normally turned over $75 million, financial experts expected it to increase to $100 million and it only went up to $94 million, where did that extra $6 million go? Hence the lawsuit with the BBC.

magaloons desperately holding on to the absurd belief that their cult leader will hand his financial records to the court to be examined.

Has he ever handed his financial records over to be publicly cross examined before?

Leftie cultists still clinging to the absurd belief the most investigated and leaked man in history fears more information getting out. He couldn't even trust the IRS not to leak his records.

It's impossible to prove he made more, less or the same profit than he would have made without the BBC lies


If for example Mar-a-Lago normally turned over $75 million, financial experts expected it to increase to $100 million and it only went up to $94 million, where did that extra $6 million go? Hence the lawsuit with the BBC.

clown still not getting the point. trump is refusing so far to provide the financial information, under discovery, that would support his case.

saddo

they know they are guilty

not capable of understanding that "guilt" is a non-existent concept in civil cases.

You clearly care far more than I. It will cost them a fortune regardless of the result,
it couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.

not capable of understanding that "guilt" is a non-existent concept in civil cases.

They keep pointing it out when EJ Carrol vs Trump is mentioned.

BTW, She got paid the $5.8million for his SA this week.

Can you imagine any other head of state paying out $5.8million damages for SA and it NOT being front page news?

When the jury found in favour of EJC did they know she lied about her legal funding? And what else did she lie about? With no evidence and no witnesses the jury took her whole fishy story in good faith based on her word against his and then she turns out to be a perjurer. If I was one of those jurors I would be furious about being misled by EJC. She was asked if Reed Hoffman funded her multi-million dollar legal team and she said no - a blatant lie and something the jury needed to know about. Wouldn't you have wanted to know that? If the jury had known there was a political motive by the same guy who funded Kamala's campaign they would have come to a very different verdict.

Bad week for DJT
Approval rating of just
32%

Perhaps he needs to reflect in the pools!!!

There's been a few developments over the last month as his defamation case against the BBC trundles on.


As predicted, Trump decided to drop the "Damages to his business" claim as he would have to show tangible
evidence of damages to his businesses to the court.

In an unusual step, the judge allowed the plaintiff to rewrite his lawsuit and proceed as though it had been the original lawsuit. He has dropped any damages claim to his business, and upped his claim from $5billion to $10 BILLION damages against the BBC for damage to "His Brand", a less tangible and less verifiable claim.

Pursuant to this new claim, the BBC have asked the court to subpeona his children to give evidence in court.  The plaintiff has expressed outrage that people who are part of the brand should be required
to give evidence to the court on the damage of the brand.


Trump gained the upper hand yesterday when he pulled judge Altman from the case and replaced him with
a new judge who's name would not pass the censor of this forum.
This new judge is a recent trump appointee, appointed after he gave favourable legal advice to trump in another
trump defamation case which he was not involved in at the time, but was later appointed to rule over and
duly ruled in Trumps favour.


observers are saying this judge swap makes this case smell of an undesirable brown waste product, as Head of State meddling with the judges to obtain the result he wants is usually descibed as corruption when it happens
outside the USA.

The case is currently set to go to trial by jury in February 2027


Of the 570,000 Iplayer views of the program in question, less than 250 were from IP addresses in the courts juristriction of Florida, over 200 of those views come from Carnival Cruises HQ and were viewed on cruise
ships arround the world, leaving just 34 possible views or $35 million damages for each view.

my maffs is wrong in previous post

$10 billion damages = $10billion / 34 views = $350 Million worth of brand damage per view

Why would anyone take the side of the disgraced BBC? They covered up for Savile for 40 years.

WE are British Patriots.

All British patriots who are not in a foreign cult intuitively support and seek to defend Britain against foreign attacks.




BBC has it's flaws, but it is the best TV media organisation in the world... by a long mile, name another one if you disagree.

And Harris and Hall. Disgraceful.

And Harris and Hall. Disgraceful.

The British prosecuted these PDFiles such as Harris and Hall.


These foreign cult members are still rallying round and defending their very own Jimmy Saville.
Zero american prosecutions, Open prison and day release 6 months into a 20 year stretch for the English madame.
Zero prosecutions of the american perps and gang leaders.

Disgraceful indeed.

Zero prosecutions? Under which president were Epstein and Maxwell prosecuted? And how many prosecutions were there under Democrats? And who are these other people who should be prosecuted?

The funniest thing about the current Canada-USA trade talks is that Daveed is claiming a huge victory in getting American booze and dairy back on Canadian shelves. They will be gathering dust.

He is going all billy big balls with the new epic economic fury operation re Iran. In the meantime the US debt clock is like a windmill in a hurricane and debt passes $40 Trillion. Propping up Japan and the UA because bricking it the will sell their bonds and even higher than the already very high interest debts repayments rates to come, ooooooooh!

He hasn't got any choice, the loss of the petrodollar system would be a disaster and would cause the Debt Clock to tick much faster. That's the main thing that keeps American borrowing costs as low as they are. Without the petrodollar they would be paying crazy provvy rates, even Ocean wouldn't touch them.

Isn't it heading that way(loss of petrodollar) with the Straits closed? Putting it in perspective 10 year bonds EU are @ 3%, with the US 5%+. Would it be fair to say the Iran war is costing trillions?

The petrodollar should probably be renamed the NATOdollar.

NATO has rules regarding weapons interopability, and the main benificiary of these rules is US as it forces
NATO countries to buy huge amount of weapons from America.

The recent spat has caused the EU to fast track the European Defense Initiative (EDI), the bottom line is
the EU countries will buy weapons off each other and TRillions of $dollars will stop pouring into US.
This in turn leads to a large drop in the EU's need to keep $reserves to pay for american weapons.



If america doesn't manage to squash the EDI, the $NATOdollar will lose it's reason to exist, and america loses a large number of $bond buyers who use them as instruments to buy weapons.

The war with Iran, and having the straits closed may be costing trillions across the world in total, but it's not costing America trillions as far as I know, although preventing a petrodollar collapse is worth almost any price to America. It's a classic don't kill the golden goose situation. American hegemony is doing well out of having the straits closed and China's oil supply choked and the petrodollar couldn't exist without American hegemony. If you ask me giving up now would be bonkers.

Buffet is warning of the huge fallout from americas attack on NATO partners and what happens to the $dollar if/when EDI becomes the EU nations primary defense spend.

Canada & Austrailia have also signed up to EDI, as they like the idea of spending your own defense budget in your own country and the benefit to GDP and jobs it brings.

Petrodollar was always a bit like the Mob i thought. Small as it is,the Petroyuan is in play too and like the EDI another way to circumvent dealing with the US which they themselves have instigated by tariffs and by cutting ties with Nato except the rest of the world isn't really playing ball with the US as it is looking for alternatives and rightly.
It isn't a question of 'giving up' but they cannot bale out,they have shut the Straits themselves,they really need to surrender.

Surrender? Are you feeling alright?

Yes,tickety boo even, Bessent is threatening with the US's 'operation economic fury' to unleash unparalleled hardship on the Iranian people in an illegal war,weren't they supposed to be helping them and was an excuse for the farce?

Some people say the war is illegal but according to you lefties building a ballroom is illegal. He can't so much as break wind without catching a felony.

They even tried to prosecute him for stealing his own documents. Bonkers!