Markets are clearly saying Tories will get less than 100 seats and the party vote will half - i.e nearly 75% of Tory MPs will lose their seats about 280.
A quick look of constinuency betting markets still has a lot of the sitting MPs at odds on to win.
This suggest to me one market is wrong i.e Tories will get more than 100 seats or some seats the Tory candidate should be odds against and they are not.
Probability doesn't work like that. Tories could be evens chances in 150 seats, ie the fav in all of them and therefore expected to win only in 75.
The problem is that the market doesn't by definition know which ones will lose.
I've simplified it just to explain the point.
The obvious skill is identifying the ones where evens doesn't reflect the true odds.
There are far more variables in this domestic general election than any other I have been involved in, betting wise. Labour majority is a lock obviously, but lots of the minutiae is quite unpredictable.
Probability doesn't work like that. Tories could be evens chances in 150 seats, ie the fav in all of them and therefore expected to win only in 75.The problem is that the market doesn't by definition know which ones will lose.I've simplified it just
67.50 - 69.99% in turnout at over 10/1 seems a decent sporting punt, if Reform and tactics are up for driving out tories then could get up in high 60s.
67.50 - 69.99% in turnout at over 10/1 seems a decentsporting punt, if Reform and tactics are up fordriving out tories then could get up in high 60s.
Probability doesn't work like that. Tories could be evens chances in 150 seats, ie the fav in all of them and therefore expected to win only in 75.
The problem is that the market doesn't by definition know which ones will lose.
I've simplified it just to explain the point.
Indeed it doesn't, a simple uniform 2% swing either way could see them all cop or all lose if they are true evs chances
Probability doesn't work like that. Tories could be evens chances in 150 seats, ie the fav in all of them and therefore expected to win only in 75.The problem is that the market doesn't by definition know which ones will lose.I've simplified it just
Labour at 1.71 in Islington North. Survation poll for the constituency gave them a 14pt lead last week. Even allowing for Corbyn being a special case that's a lot to make up for an Independent.
Labour at 1.71 in Islington North. Survation poll for the constituency gave them a 14pt lead last week. Even allowing for Corbyn being a special case that's a lot to make up for an Independent.
Very small sample commissioned by a far left outlet. Maybe admitting you're voting for the defenestrated and humiliated Corbyn is not something you would want to do. I think it might have been using old school telephone. I can see the angle, but significant risk attached.
Very small sample commissioned by a far left outlet. Maybe admitting you're voting for the defenestrated and humiliated Corbyn is not something you would want to do. I think it might have been using old school telephone. I can see the angle, but sign
Very small sample commissioned by a far left outlet. Maybe admitting you're voting for the defenestrated and humiliated Corbyn is not something you would want to do. I think it might have been using old school telephone. I can see the angle, but significant risk attached.
Yeah but Survation are reputable even if Novara and Stats for Lefties aren't. Shy Tories I get but I've yet to meet a shy Corbynite - it's usually the first thing out of their mouths. I take your point that he may be damaged goods now. You're right about the methodology – a combination of landline and mobile data. Owen Jones is on the ground there campaigning – usually the kiss of death.
Very small sample commissioned by a far left outlet. Maybe admitting you're voting for the defenestrated and humiliated Corbyn is not something you would want to do. I think it might have been using old school telephone. I can see the angle, but sign
Commissioners do tend to get the results they want, even if the mechanics pass scrutiny. I'd be wary of this personally. Sample of 500, phone poll, biased commissioners. Lots of wealth warnings. You even have to trust people not to believe that voting for Corbyn isn't voting for Labour in the ballot box. Of course it doesn't mean Labour won't win, they probably will, but I wouldn't be basing my position solely on that poll. I actually backed Labour in IN and took my stake back after the poll was published and shifted the market.
Commissioners do tend to get the results they want, even if the mechanics pass scrutiny. I'd be wary of this personally. Sample of 500, phone poll, biased commissioners. Lots of wealth warnings. You even have to trust people not to believe that votin
islington north has been a fun one, flipped a few times between labour and JC, that may be done now, but maybe not
ilford north is curious some person/people seem willing to back any other candidate, as in leanne mohamad, at seemingly crazy low prices, i've laid her at 3.5, not for any great shakes, last matched price currently showing 4.1?! LM is a palestinian brit running as an independent, some dude on vote uk seems to be bigging up her chances to turn over wes streeting https://vote-2012.proboards.com/thread/18339/ilford-north?page=4 skybets market on this has labour 1/33 but with LM's price suspended, dont really know how that works
islington north has been a fun one, flipped a few times between labour and JC, that may be done now, but maybe notilford north is curioussome person/people seem willing to back any other candidate, as in leanne mohamad, at seemingly crazy low prices,
UB - suggest you lay the 2.18 50-99 seats for them then .
Since you prompt a few ****-packet calculations, paolo47, I would rather be a backer than a layer in that market.
There are 650 seats but we can discount twenty to the peculiarities of the constituencies in NI and Brighton.
Expectation ceiling for Labour now is 500 but that would depend on a wipeout for the SNP in Scotland, where the Conservatives have only eight MPs, which leaves us with 130 squeezable seats. In which case the Conservative Party will certainly land in the 50-99 bracket.
It may be a failure of my imagination but - after a lifetime of proving that a vote for the Lib Dems is a wasted vote - I just cannot see the British electorate returning a yellow MP in the majority of those seats. Add to that, the Tories' record as the most successful and enduring political party in the history of the world cannot be dismissed: - potential future leaders are in vulnerable seats. We cannot expect Tory Party strategists to sacrifice their own future. Reform today is a not credible right-wing alternative to the Tory Party:- it doesn't even have a manifesto, it doesn't even have a future in 2025, depending on the caprice of the nicotine-stained-tree-frog.
So expect Fleet St to pitch for Sunak until midnight on Thursday.
UB - suggest you lay the 2.18 50-99 seats for them then .Since you prompt a few ****-packet calculations, paolo47, I would rather be a backer than a layer in that market. There are 650 seats but we can discount twenty to the peculiarities of the con
If enough people vote tactically, it would be Keir Starmer vs Ed Davey.
The Tories would be on the back benches, fuming and irrelevant. As they would be for the next 5 years.
Can only happen if people vote tactically.
First PMQs of the new government is on 24 July.If enough people vote tactically, it would be Keir Starmer vs Ed Davey.The Tories would be on the back benches, fuming and irrelevant. As they would be for the next 5 years.Can only happen if people vote
bojo market may have been the one that caused politicspunter to toodle out of his edinburgh abode, not paying attention, and walking in front of a tram. took a long time with the speed those trams go to see him off, theres word a few posters here may have got there in time for his final moments. RIP
bojo market may have been the one that caused politicspunter to toodle out of his edinburgh abode, not paying attention, and walking in front of a tram.took a long time with the speed those trams go to see him off, theres word a few posters here may
bojo market may have been the one that caused politicspunter to toodle out of his edinburgh abode, not paying attention, and walking in front of a tram. took a long time with the speed those trams go to see him off, theres word a few posters here may have got there in time for his final moments. RIP
The spirit of politicspunter lives on (slight return) in yak hunt
bojo market may have been the one that caused politicspunter to toodle out of his edinburgh abode, not paying attention, and walking in front of a tram.took a long time with the speed those trams go to see him off, theres word a few posters here may
most folk seem to be guessing in the 300s for labour and yet they are 6.2 to get less than 395 https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.229292672
most folk seem to be guessing in the 300s for labour and yet they are 6.2 to get less than 395https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.229292672
Long story short, predicted seats won over twelve models:
Lib Dems 57+
Labour 454
Greens 2
SNP 17
Conservatives 101
Guardian poll of pollshttps://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jul/02/when-sunak-called-an-election-labour-was-22-points-ahead-has-anything-changedLong story short, predicted seats won over twelve models:Lib Dems 57+Labour 454Greens 2SNP 17C
UK - Next General Election - Most Seats Without Labour
Conservatives 1.22.
Should be 1.01 imo
No drama. Woke up and the market was already settled.
On to the Next Conservative Leader market..
UK - Next General Election - Most Seats Without LabourConservatives 1.22.Should be 1.01 imoNo drama. Woke up and the market was already settled.On to the Next Conservative Leader market..