Farage blasting out full support for Putin

the term "volk" is rarely used in german because of its ethnic connotations

most politicians use different terms more similar to the englsh word "population" i cant remember what it is

"Giuseppe, I extensively explained that in the relevant thread."

you posted a load of nonsense

"ein volk"

volkisch

what do these terms mean?

they refer to "ethnic" germans

Habeck is saying that the traditional concept of German no longer exists

you are all now multiclutural germans

mesut ozil is the same as thomas muller

this is what german means now

You are frankly hopeless. I have never encountered anyone bar myself who is so utterly convinced that he knows everything when in all honesty he knows and understands very little.

You even have the hubris to lecture a German on the German language when you don't speak any German yourself, according to yourself.

you yourself expressed similar sentiments to habeck

you tried that argue that there is really no such thing as german, because bavarians are different to prussians etc.

that there is no over-arching quality of "german"

this is classic post-structuralist politically correct woke thinking

you even tried to argue there was no such thing as "Italian" or "Irish"

you have no self awareness

you said bascially the same thing as habeck and you don;t even realise it

i know what volk means edy

i know a lot about german hisotory

i know what volkisch means as well

it is disngenuous of you to suggest volk does not have ethnic connotations

Go re-read the relevant thread. You quite obviously don't quite remember what I wrote.

does volk have ethnic connotations or not?

it's like talking to an antifa / blm activist

do you also believe in unconsious bias and white privilege?

Go re-read the thread if you are genuinely interested.

Feb 22, 2022 -- 3:07AM, Giuseppe wrote:

it's like talking to an antifa / blm activistdo you also believe in unconsious bias and white privilege?

To decide on this I would need you to provide definitions of those two things. People are sometimes rather loose, sometimes deliberately loose and deliberately wrong, with their definitions on such things.

Farage taking the side of our enemy, the killer of British citizens on our own country with chemical weapons, says a lot about his patriotism.

Putin is a fascist, an extreme right wing nutter, and an evil killer with no concern for the value of any human life other than his own. He is an evil murderer who has crushed opposition at home and poisoned it abroad. His malign attacks on our democracy is well proven. He is our enemy and yet the U.K. has done nothing at all about his mafia money being laundered in London. The obvious link to the fact of Putin funding the Tory Party is a shameful thing.

Every Russian oligarch should have any British property, and any assets held in Britain by Putin henchmen should be confiscated now. Should have happened years ago after Crimea and Salisbury.

Farage knows his audience - high-school dropout anti-vaxxer moon-landing denying trump fans

I would vote for him

Idiot announces he would vote for a fellow idiot

Tut tut , why do remainers and leftists have to be so rude ?

The only traitors of course is not Farage but those remainers who refused to accept
and tried to overthrow the democratic referendum - own it .

Accepting money from our enemies in exchange for influencing decisions that weaken our country is treachery. Send him to the tower. Do not pass go.

Feb 22, 2022 -- 10:24AM, PorcupineorPineapple wrote:

Accepting money from our enemies in exchange for influencing decisions that weaken our country is treachery. Send him to the tower. Do not pass go.

Blue Anon
Russia, Russia, Russia

Is there a red under your bed?

Amazing how many single digit IQ folk think Russia control the UK & USA

Yeak ok Vlad. Stick to your guns despite all our warnings coming to pass. Which side will you be on I wonder?

ok if that makes you feel better about your bad behaviour
not that it excuses the facts of the treachery of remainers
it just makes it more hypocritical , not good

I, like Farage is on nobody's side
It's completely laughable

Tinpot Russia are going to invade Ukraine, & then what?
This would have never happened under Trump
Putin knows what complete losers barry & biden are

Farage on no-one's side

It’s always someone else’s fault with remainers
Farage has his point of view that’s fine , everyone has
When you take part in a vote accept the outcome of that vote
Or don’t vote , it’s not difficult to understand even for remainers

ha ha what would trump have done. stood up beside pootin like a gimp again and said everyone else is lying and pootin is telling the truth?

Feb 22, 2022 -- 10:30AM, PorcupineorPineapple wrote:

Farage on no-one's side

Is this you?

https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1447408166657003522?s=20&t=LiVJB4MwvCqmaW9Zjs3K7g

Feb 22, 2022 -- 10:33AM, dave1357 wrote:

ha ha what would trump have done. stood up beside pootin like a gimp again and said everyone else is lying and pootin is telling the truth?

Putin wouldn't have dared to do anything while Trump was in charge
Now the trainee corpse is there, he knows he can play a few games

No mate. I'm the guy who's posted my thoughts well in advance and sadly, like Cassandra, am watching them come alive while the mugs are still getting their opinions formed by RT and youtube.

that would be the same trump that wanted to break up nato? Why would pootin "do anything" when trump was doing everything for him?

barry and biden?  It's also a case of Russia watching as Europe has run itself so badly as to shoot itself in the foot by coming apart politically.  Then of course there is the apology of a minister of state who runs our lot.  At least presides over it.  And of course Nato threating to do to Ukraine what Kruschev did to Cuba.
It is a shambles of the West's making .  And guess what - we voted all of these people and situations in!   

dave1357 Joined: 05 Sep 10
Replies: 1873122 Feb 22 10:49 
that would be the same trump that wanted to break up nato? Why would pootin

.....................


I think that was to get countries -especially Germany- to cough up their unpaid membership fees dave?

there aren't any "membership fees"

To be fair, that Christopher Chandler and his Legatum Institute needs a bit of digging into. Open him up and there'll just be more petrushka dolls inside, he's that Russian.

dave,  it was figure of speech.  The poster is right, Trump wanted them to pay much more to the pot which funds the[organisation's activities.  He never once to my knowledge suggested it's dismantling or the USA leaving it.

That's also garbage

It was about Germany spending more of its GDP on its own military budget, not about Germany putting anything additional into any NATO pots to directly fund NATO or any of its activities.

Officially that was his aim anyway. In reality it was much more likely domestic posturing.

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-nato-leaders-kept-trump-from-blowing-up-the-alliance-2021-12?r=US&IR=T
.

Trump likely fist pumping the invasion too.

Hoping the loans disappear.

Donald Trump questioned the necessity of NATO, complained about US spending on the alliance, and criticized the underinvestment of many NATO members.

No mention whatsoever of him wanting to "blow it up".

"seemed" was the word used in the article.  He clearly questioned everything, and rightly so.  Certainly made the member states sit up and take notice.  Complacency, as is being proved now, is Nato's biggest weakness.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/14/us/politics/nato-president-trump.html

Senior administration officials told The New York Times that several times over the course of 2018, Mr. Trump privately said he wanted to withdraw from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Current and former officials who support the alliance said they feared Mr. Trump could return to his threat as allied military spending continued to lag behind the goals the president had set.

In the days around a tumultuous NATO summit meeting last summer, they said, Mr. Trump told his top national security officials that he did not see the point of the military alliance, which he presented as a drain on the United States.

And remember trump was impeached for holding back military aid from Ukraine to try to force them to investigate Biden.

Well trump was being paid to say that, so
he would say it.

The whole right wing racist whack job set up is funded
that way.

during his presidency there was a huge disconnect between Trump and the State Department. Trump was hostile to NATO and never once criticised Putin while for the USA NATO remained a vital partnership and Russia very much not a friend.

Trump was hostile to NATO and never once criticised Putin

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-50875935

He might not have criticised him but Trump approved sanctions on Nord Stream 2. Biden lifted them.

Truehoncho you are right about Trump as he is in Putin's pocket.When Trumps hotel chain was failing and he seemed to be heading for bankruptcy Russian businessmen pumped an absolute fortune into his chain. Their were money laundering on behalf of Vlad.  This is why Trump has resisted examination of his financial affairs by the American tax authorities for ever it seems to me.

Always "seemed" or "privately" and thus no hard facts or corroboration.
I don't accept such stuff until there is clear, irrefutable hard evidence.
It's irrelevant anyway.  Nato still exists and is still a cabal of toothless wonders.

Feb 22, 2022 -- 1:54PM, angrybryan wrote:

Truehoncho you are right about Trump as he is in Putin's pocket.When Trumps hotel chain was failing and he seemed to be heading for bankruptcy Russian businessmen pumped an absolute fortune into his chain. Their were money laundering on behalf of Vlad.

NATO & the UN are completely worthless

In full agreement.  You could also add the WHO, whose handling of this pandemic, in the early stages, appears to have left a lot to be desired.

Loyalhoncho you are never going to get 100% irrefutable truth that Vlad is a naughty boy because he is exceptionally clever at hiding his criminality behind hundreds of different front companies and gets others to carry out his illicit acts.

Farage the only person with any sense

ok you lefty slow learner fukktards

trump increased sanctions on russia, humiliated putin in syria and tried again and again to pressure germany into cancelling nord stream

russian collussion is fake news and you ahve al falen for it hook line and sinker

LoyalHoncho • February 22, 2022 2:41 PM GMT
You could also add the WHO, whose handling of this pandemic, in the early stages, appears to have left a lot to be desired.

Perhaps if trump had backed them up instead of sucking up to China because he wanted a trade deal, they would have had more info on which to make a decision.

back in august the WHO was advising against boosters saying the west should give the jabs to africans instead

imagine what would have happened if we had followed their advice

Vladimir has Donald in his pocket. When Trump won the election against Hillary Clinton,it was the Russians who gave Trump the information that Hillary Clinton was using a private email account. That's because they wanted Trump to win.

yes mate that's exactly what happened

hilary's emails came up early in the primaries

neithr trump nor hillary were even the nominees at that point

That information won Trump the election.his lock her up chant was devastating.

of course it did mate

was decisive

and lock her up was only about the emails

and trump did so much for vlad in return

it's all so clear and obvious

why can't these trumptards accept the truth?

"Russian spies began trying to hack Hillary Clinton's email server on the very day Donald Trump urged the Russian government to find emails Clinton erased".  This was possibly an AMAZING COINCIDENCE

yes Russia wanted Trump to win I have no doubt about that

how much impact their efforts had is another story

and the suggestion that Trump is somehow indebted to them is ludicrous

the scandal of her emails started much eralier than that

i can remember it coming up during the primary debates between her and sanders

and the russians never did find the emails, or at least they were never released

Yes I agree the Russians probably tried to trap Trump,but failed.

clinton was in trouble because she had deleted emails, and had also been using a private (uunsecure) email account whenn  secretary of state

this was common knowledge long before either won their parties nominations

i think its plausible there were indirect attempts to contact  members of the Trump campaign

i don't see any evidence that anything evr came of it

i also take these stories about russian cybertatacks / hacking with a pinch of salt

who knows what is really going on

Lend us a Rouble mate

Just enough for one beer or potato vodka

haven't got a rouble mate sorry or a euro

I have got a lot of info from the book I mentioned yesterday. Apparently Trumps fondness for exceptionally good looking women very nearly did end up getting him into Vlads clutches. He was visiting Moscow and a honeytrap had been sent up,with the full works videos the lot. It was only the intervention of FBI agents that physically stopped Don Wan,going to the hotel room.

yes mate i'm 100% sure all of that is true

Scholz: Europe needs to diversify its energy supply

yes, no reliance on america please

It was fact checked by lots of academics.The money trail from the Kremlin to Panama Switzerland Venezuela England and other dodgy countries was forensically examined and found to be credible.

Vlad tried to video Trump having sex with women in Moscow

the FBI knew about this and intervened to stop it

this has all been fact checked and proven

yes mate of course it has

what has Panama got to do with this?

Putin was financing billionaire Donbald Trumps campaign like he needed he money is that it?

you watch too much CNN mate

God help us lol

It's fcuk all to do with Trump.  The WHO sat on their rsses, scared stiff of China, in the very early stages of the virus, before doing anything about alerting the world.
Long before bleach became an issue. 

I get my information from a proven source.not from the back of a box of spaghetti!.

ok mate can you provide some sources please

Roger Daltrey there never be another rocker as good as him

WHO?

some sources for

Putin financed Trump

Putin tried to videotape Trump

the FBI intervned to stop

please do not mention the ridiculous Steele dossier

Exactly

Farage on now

the voice of reason

So fount of knowledge where do you get your info from.I thought the Daily Worker had ceased publication?

thanks mate still waiting for your sources

you read a load of bullshitt fake news and swallowed it all hook line and sinker

i doubt even CNN or BBC have made those claims

the steele dossier claimed Putin had videotapes of Trump urinating on prostitutes in a Moscow hotel room

as i said, i dont think even CNN takes it seriously anymore

Patreaus was a good pundit on sky just now

Farage on the money

Farage talking about Russian wheat exports, corn, various minerals, especially nickel

you won't here this anywhere else

I am afraid your back of the pasta box cerebral knowledge has defeated me Giuseppe old chap.

potassium nitrate export ban will affect fertiliser proces

do yourself a favour mate and start watching GB News

Germany dependent on gas because they shut down their nuclear plants