Politics
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
How come people still laying and why not suspended? Got money tied up but dont want to lay off
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 20
|
By:
Got till midnight ...... could still happen
|
|
By:
Cheers
|
|
By:
does that vote today count as MV3?
|
|
By:
It was Meaningful Vote 2.5
She's going to bring back MV3.0 next week ? |
|
By:
She's still not budging
She's without doubt the most scummiest PM of all time |
|
By:
Actually punter that's a good question, it was a vote on the withdrawal agreement as per the rules,so I guess it counts as mv3, however the other market "will mv3 happen" obviously suggests it didnt happen, what you reckon sont ?
|
|
By:
This, from the main bbc article...
This was not a third "meaningful vote" on the PM's EU deal, which also includes a political declaration on future relations between the UK and the EU, and which has previously been rejected by larger margins. By holding a vote on the withdrawal agreement only, the government had hoped to secure a short delay to Brexit and avoid the UK taking part in May's European elections. |
|
By:
yes happy with that, it looks pretty clear its going void, given you can still back the number of "ayes", and the betting pattern on the other market, but that aside the rules of the bet in question suggest it wont be void, what am I missing
|
|
By:
Will the House of Commons vote through a government motion to approve a EU withdrawal agreement at the 3rd MEANINGFUL VOTE?
This market refers to the 3rd meaningful vote only. If this vote does not take place before the 30/03/2019 this market will be voided. Any votes on amendments to the motion do not count For the purpose of this market any vote by the House of Lords does not count. If the House of Commons vote through the government motion on a EU withdrawal agreement then Yes will be settled as a winner.[/i]............... forget the name, what exactly hasn't happened |
|
By:
|
|
By:
88 yes, doesn't bother me ,just interested why ? it was a "meaningful vote" on the "withdrawal agreement" and in the date specified
|
|
By:
The rules stated it had to be the complete thing, ie. with the political declaration, it wasn't.
|
|
By:
I didnt see that, I will look again, thanks for now
|
|
By:
Honestly,can you hear Bercow.
Did someone mention significant change. |
|
By:
Ahh cheers, "section 13 bit", was going crazy here, knew it was void but couldn't see why # blind fecka
 |
|
By:
the rules were amended last night. mmmm
|
|
By:
Actually saw that, have no idea what was changed but assume it was the future arrangement bit
|
|
By:
I see that. It seems the fairest way to resolve it.
|
|
By:
seems weird to leave a market trading today that was bound to be misconstrued?
|
|
By:
They would be unable to void it before the "closing date".
|