Politics
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
22 Feb 14
09:58
Joined:
Date Joined:
11 Feb 11
the elephant in the room is the radio 5 report of shootings at canary wharf a few hours after the trains were blown up
the best laid plans of mice and men are apt to go astray
did the alleged bombers arrive in london in time to catch the trains which were blown up
there were problems on the underground that day and many trains were late including the trains from luton
if the alleged bombers did get there in time to catch the trains they were alleged to have blown up it would have been a close run thing.
it is more likely than not that they did not catch the trains in question
the theory that they did not catch the trains in question is consistent with the radio 5 canary wharf shooting reports
the theory that they did catch the train is not consistent with the canary wharf reports
the powers that be have a problem because they cannot account for the reports of shootings at canary wharf
all they did was to deny that the police shot anybody at the wharf - they didn't mention the army though
i have yet to hear of the bbc's explanation for this shootings report at canary, bizarrely they do not seem to have given one
the narrative that the alleged bombers were shot at canary is more likely than the narrative that had them blowing up the trains
the narrative that the alleged bombers caught the train would still leave the canary shooting report unexplained.....oh dear
the best laid plans of mice and men are apt to go astray
did the alleged bombers arrive in london in time to catch the trains which were blown up
there were problems on the underground that day and many trains were late including the trains from luton
if the alleged bombers did get there in time to catch the trains they were alleged to have blown up it would have been a close run thing.
it is more likely than not that they did not catch the trains in question
the theory that they did not catch the trains in question is consistent with the radio 5 canary wharf shooting reports
the theory that they did catch the train is not consistent with the canary wharf reports
the powers that be have a problem because they cannot account for the reports of shootings at canary wharf
all they did was to deny that the police shot anybody at the wharf - they didn't mention the army though
i have yet to hear of the bbc's explanation for this shootings report at canary, bizarrely they do not seem to have given one
the narrative that the alleged bombers were shot at canary is more likely than the narrative that had them blowing up the trains
the narrative that the alleged bombers caught the train would still leave the canary shooting report unexplained.....oh dear
Show More
Please provide a link to the recording of this radio 5 report or failing that a transcript of the report.
Seems unlikely there can be shootings in a very busy part of London in broad daylight without hundreds of witnesses.
Seems unlikely there can be shootings in a very busy part of London in broad daylight without hundreds of witnesses.
there was a report on radio 5 that some 'terrorists were shot dead at canary wharf
that report was never repeated
it would appear that the bbc were never asked to explain it
why not
it appears to have been airbrushed out - oh dear
that report was never repeated
it would appear that the bbc were never asked to explain it
why not
it appears to have been airbrushed out - oh dear
So , did anybody in one of the busiest parts of the country notice 4 guys bing shot, falling down, attended to & taken away?
Can we assume there is zero evidence to support wackjob's belief that these guys were shot at Canary Whalf, in the middle of a work day.
Can we assume there is zero evidence to support wackjob's belief that these guys were shot at Canary Whalf, in the middle of a work day.
youd better explain the radio broadcast then
go and switch your brain on you silly billy
go and switch your brain on you silly billy
Radio broadcast, are you mad wackjob?
Are you claiming that 4 people were shot in one of the busiest parts of the country , their bodies were taken away(by ambulance??? ) without anybody seeing this events.
WTF has a few people claiming on loon tube to have heard a radio broadcast got to do with 4 people being shot in front of hundreds of people none of whom witnessed anything.
So wackjob, do you agree that there is zero evidence that 4 people were shot at Canary Whalf.
Are you claiming that 4 people were shot in one of the busiest parts of the country , their bodies were taken away(by ambulance??? ) without anybody seeing this events.
WTF has a few people claiming on loon tube to have heard a radio broadcast got to do with 4 people being shot in front of hundreds of people none of whom witnessed anything.
So wackjob, do you agree that there is zero evidence that 4 people were shot at Canary Whalf.
'Radio broadcast, are you mad wackjob?
Are you claiming that 4 people were shot in one of the busiest parts of the country , their bodies were taken away(by ambulance??? ) without anybody seeing this events.
WTF has a few people claiming on loon tube to have heard a radio broadcast got to do with 4 people being shot in front of hundreds of people none of whom witnessed anything.
So wackjob, do you agree that there is zero evidence that 4 people were shot at Canary Whalf.' writes mr mex
***********************************************
no 'Greatest Schoolboy', if the alleged bombers were at canary the authorities (a word that GS loves) would have cleared the area, they would have got public out of the way rapido
as far as i am aware there is no evidence that puts alleged terrorists at canary
the only evidence that raises the possibility of the alleged terrorists being at canary is the news bulletin on radio 5 at circa 10-45am
i heard that one myself
it was never repeated
please provide an explanation for said radio bulletin 'Greatest Schoolboy'.
Are you claiming that 4 people were shot in one of the busiest parts of the country , their bodies were taken away(by ambulance??? ) without anybody seeing this events.
WTF has a few people claiming on loon tube to have heard a radio broadcast got to do with 4 people being shot in front of hundreds of people none of whom witnessed anything.
So wackjob, do you agree that there is zero evidence that 4 people were shot at Canary Whalf.' writes mr mex
***********************************************
no 'Greatest Schoolboy', if the alleged bombers were at canary the authorities (a word that GS loves) would have cleared the area, they would have got public out of the way rapido
as far as i am aware there is no evidence that puts alleged terrorists at canary
the only evidence that raises the possibility of the alleged terrorists being at canary is the news bulletin on radio 5 at circa 10-45am
i heard that one myself
it was never repeated
please provide an explanation for said radio bulletin 'Greatest Schoolboy'.
as far as i am aware there is no evidence that puts alleged terrorists at canary
Well done Wacko you are correct there is zero evidence - it has taken 7 years but you are getting there.
So to confirm....
There is zero evidence that people we shot at Canary Whalf. Nobody claims to have witnessed these shooting even though there were thousands of people in the area.
There are not even any witnesses who claimed that "the authorities cleared the area".
So in one of the busiest places on the planet - 4 people were shot but nobody witnessed anybody fire the shots or anybody being hit by the bullets, nobody witnessed any of the 4 shot people being put in an ambulance and taken away, nobody witnessed any mass police operation to Clear the area of thousands of workers "rapido".
Have you any idea how long it would take to clear Canary Whalf "rapido" on a workday - espically when the tube system was shut? Don't you think somebody may have mentioned thousands of office staff being cleared "rapido"
People had phones, cameras, e-mails but nobody thought they might report 4 people having their brains splattered across Canary Whalf.
So zero evidence that 4 people were shot at Canary Whalf - but why should that prevent the Wackjobs of this world from believing this theory.
Well done Wacko you are correct there is zero evidence - it has taken 7 years but you are getting there.
So to confirm....
There is zero evidence that people we shot at Canary Whalf. Nobody claims to have witnessed these shooting even though there were thousands of people in the area.
There are not even any witnesses who claimed that "the authorities cleared the area".
So in one of the busiest places on the planet - 4 people were shot but nobody witnessed anybody fire the shots or anybody being hit by the bullets, nobody witnessed any of the 4 shot people being put in an ambulance and taken away, nobody witnessed any mass police operation to Clear the area of thousands of workers "rapido".
Have you any idea how long it would take to clear Canary Whalf "rapido" on a workday - espically when the tube system was shut? Don't you think somebody may have mentioned thousands of office staff being cleared "rapido"
People had phones, cameras, e-mails but nobody thought they might report 4 people having their brains splattered across Canary Whalf.
So zero evidence that 4 people were shot at Canary Whalf - but why should that prevent the Wackjobs of this world from believing this theory.
you 'forgot' to answer one question 'greatest schoolboy'.
I repeat it here for your convenience
'please provide an explanation for said radio bulletin 'Greatest Schoolboy'?.
I repeat it here for your convenience
'please provide an explanation for said radio bulletin 'Greatest Schoolboy'?.
What radio report?
There is zero evidence anything happened at Canary Whalf , the loons want to talk about a radio report . What was said on Capital radio or on radio one is not evidence of 4 people being shot in front of many witnesses who then all forgot about the killings. A radio report does not explain how thousand of office workers were evacuated out the area "rapido" but also forgot that anything strange happened.
What was on the radio (& there is very little evidence of a radio report ) is totally irrelevant .
There is zero evidence that 4 people were shot in one of the busiest parts of the country, no e-mail chains, no photos, no witnesses, nothing.
This wacko theory relies on 4 people being shot at Canary Whalf, there is Zero evidence this happened, it does not matter what a phone in on Yorkshire radio said , there is zero evidence of shootings in front of many office workers.
Please provide some evidence that these people were shot.
There is zero evidence anything happened at Canary Whalf , the loons want to talk about a radio report . What was said on Capital radio or on radio one is not evidence of 4 people being shot in front of many witnesses who then all forgot about the killings. A radio report does not explain how thousand of office workers were evacuated out the area "rapido" but also forgot that anything strange happened.
What was on the radio (& there is very little evidence of a radio report ) is totally irrelevant .
There is zero evidence that 4 people were shot in one of the busiest parts of the country, no e-mail chains, no photos, no witnesses, nothing.
This wacko theory relies on 4 people being shot at Canary Whalf, there is Zero evidence this happened, it does not matter what a phone in on Yorkshire radio said , there is zero evidence of shootings in front of many office workers.
Please provide some evidence that these people were shot.
Greatest schoolboy what causes you to believe that I listen to yorkshire radio
are you being disingenuous, you know what radio bulletin I am referring to
it is the one I heard on radio 5 on 7/7
do you deny that there was such a broadcast, thousands must have heard it
why was it never repeated
why was no explanation forthcoming from the bbc
was it all a mistake by the bbc
why didn't the media ask about it
are you being disingenuous, you know what radio bulletin I am referring to
it is the one I heard on radio 5 on 7/7
do you deny that there was such a broadcast, thousands must have heard it
why was it never repeated
why was no explanation forthcoming from the bbc
was it all a mistake by the bbc
why didn't the media ask about it
why was it never repeated
Well perhaps they realised it was total b0llux, with no evidence for such an event, so didn't repeat it, which seems reasonable to me.
I'm sure on the morning of 7/7 there were thousands of reports being received by the BBC and stupidly they reported an incident in Canary Wharf that clearly didn't happen and turned out to be nonsense, and that's probably why the rest of the media didn't ask about it.
Well perhaps they realised it was total b0llux, with no evidence for such an event, so didn't repeat it, which seems reasonable to me.
I'm sure on the morning of 7/7 there were thousands of reports being received by the BBC and stupidly they reported an incident in Canary Wharf that clearly didn't happen and turned out to be nonsense, and that's probably why the rest of the media didn't ask about it.
wacko - It seems unlikely but possible there was such a broadcast.
Bentley has offered a logical explination as to why it was not repeated - another possible reason is it was never broadcast to begin with.
The most important point about this radio 5 story is it is totally irrelevant.
The theory is that 4 people arrived at Kings cross - then made their way to Canary whalf where they were shot in front of many office workers who did not notice anything strange.
These office workers are a strange group - somebody sends an e-mail with the phrase "tastes yummy" and the e-mail is forwarded to 3/4 of the English speaking world but 4 guys getting their brains splattered across Canary Whalf goes unnoticed.
There needs to be some evidence to believe this Canary Whalf account. There is zero. Where are the CCTV images of these guys getting across London (how did they get across London?). Where are the hundreds of office workers taking a look as shots are fired, people killed , ambulances called , bodies taken away. Where are the photos of such events. Where are the thousand of mobile phone calls from workers in a busy part of London.Where are the acconts of thousands of workers being cleared "rapido" by a large police presence.
At what point does a sane person realise that this Canary Whalf story is total b0llux.
Bentley has offered a logical explination as to why it was not repeated - another possible reason is it was never broadcast to begin with.
The most important point about this radio 5 story is it is totally irrelevant.
The theory is that 4 people arrived at Kings cross - then made their way to Canary whalf where they were shot in front of many office workers who did not notice anything strange.
These office workers are a strange group - somebody sends an e-mail with the phrase "tastes yummy" and the e-mail is forwarded to 3/4 of the English speaking world but 4 guys getting their brains splattered across Canary Whalf goes unnoticed.
There needs to be some evidence to believe this Canary Whalf account. There is zero. Where are the CCTV images of these guys getting across London (how did they get across London?). Where are the hundreds of office workers taking a look as shots are fired, people killed , ambulances called , bodies taken away. Where are the photos of such events. Where are the thousand of mobile phone calls from workers in a busy part of London.Where are the acconts of thousands of workers being cleared "rapido" by a large police presence.
At what point does a sane person realise that this Canary Whalf story is total b0llux.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539