Politics
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
17 Feb 13
13:28
Joined:
Date Joined:
29 Aug 02
Borrowing goal looks beyond Osborne’s reach
The Chancellor will be dealt a blow this week by official figures that will pile more pressure on the AAA sovereign credit rating and make it almost impossible for him to repeat his claim that borrowing has fallen every year under the Coalition Government.
The Chancellor will be dealt a blow this week by official figures that will pile more pressure on the AAA sovereign credit rating and make it almost impossible for him to repeat his claim that borrowing has fallen every year under the Coalition Government.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 21
|
By:
Agree - We should start making cuts.
Reduce government spending by 5%. |
|
By:
Mexico
Why are you being so wussy and tinkering at the edges? I would respect you more if you were bold proposed some real cuts like 70-80%!!! You could abolish the NHS, pensions, welfare, public education and perhaps only leave the police buget and the army budgets as well as MPs wages intact. 5% cuts from you? That is a disgrace and you should be ashame of yourself!!! Wake up Mexico if you want to be counted!!!  |
|
By:
Has Osbourne ever claimed that borrowing is falling? The deficit is falling, but debt is rising?
|
|
By:
no.but captain cameron has ,what does that make him,
 |
|
By:
It would mean he is lying if that is what he said in black and white.
|
|
By:
Cameron did Java a few weeks ago.
He is just the same as the rest. |
|
By:
why is a household budget different from that of a nations economy?
|
|
By:
cant wait till you guys are running the country.
|
|
By:
Hard to envisage any modern day politician having the required nerve to carry through the neccesary cuts to government spending. Too much short term careerism sustained by a dishonest media, happy to peddle the hysterical propaganda of the vested interests reliant on a grossly obese state.
|
|
By:
We must nationlise everything that makes a profit
then the money goes to the many rather then the few Via the people |
|
By:
Lamp - are you intending to pay the owners of said profit making organisations any money.
Or just steal it? |
|
By:
then the money goes to the many rather then the few
it already does lampus, they are pension funds, and share-holders. |
|
By:
dont be a plum all your existence mexico, te government will borrow the money and buy them.
|
|
By:
Mexico - shareholders steal from the public ever time they get a bill
|
|
By:
lampus, share-holders = general public.
|
|
By:
Manxy don't be a plum,
Where do you get the idea that Lampus would borrow the money to purchase every company who makes a profit. How would he know what is a fair price. Why would anybody lend money to Lampus? Basically another Lampus idea we can flush down the toilet. |
|
By:
he would make an excellent labour chancerlar you blue tied heathen.
|
|
By:
Old Labour would nationalise without paying any compensation
|
|
By:
One thing is for sure: They might be making a profit now. That will disappear as quickly as a two for one offer on foreskin removal in a Jewish hospital upon nationalisation. Then the subsidies start. Lampus never learned to tie his shoes so why should he understand that is what happenes with nationalisation? Some of the rest of you have no such excuse.
|
|
By:
If Lampus ran in a Doncaster/Rochdale type constituency he would get voted into power, such is the idiocy of that constituency.
|
|
By:
ed balls was right
|