|
By:
Bizarrely, no one wants to lend to gamblers these days;
Is it bizarre or is your tongue in your cheek. For the sake of serious debate we need to know which it is. |
|
By:
Sorry - seriously tongue-in-cheek. Sarcasm is my default.
I'm no economist, but is it that the link between Mortgage rates and the BoE rate has weakened (or broken altogether)? |
|
By:
It seems theres plenty like you who cant move elsewhere because lending criteria has changed, effectively their existing lenders can charge what they want.
|
|
By:
Yes - they can screw us as they please. They just have to judge the level correctly: too high and we'll all default!
|
|
By:
4.75% is still a ridiculously low rate, subsidised by printy printy and cheap government money.
interest rates set by the market normally offer deposit rates 2% above inflation, to encourage savings. lending rates would need to be 2-3% above this level, to allow the bank its margins for using short term deposits to fund long term lending. as it appears you are unattractive, be it too high an earnings/loan ratio, poor history or an asset value close to or over the loan value, we should add a higher rate. you should have an interest rate of about 12% then. of course you would default, no longer be in your mortgage "prison" and house prices would go from average $190,000 to $70,000 and the recovery would start. if you are working, buy another one, and forget the negative equity and interest only bollockios. the fact you see 4.75% as "high" shows how deluded we all are, and why 5 years after reality began to seep in, we have shut the door hoping the flood subsides. accept it is getting bigger and bigger. |
|
By:
if government didnt print the money, or lend it artificially at 0.5%, banks would have to get funds from savers and companies again, and to encourage large deposits they would need to offer savings rates of above 4.75%, never mind lending rates.
|
|
By:
Mr Reagan,
I didn't rate you all that much as a president, but you do make a good case here. Of course 4.75% is pretty good - I'm old enough to remember people fixing at 15%, I'd just gone a bit fuzzy like yourself in later years - it just shows how easy it is to become complacent. My problem with getting a mortgage these days is the withdrawal of "self cert" deals. I make a good living from gambling and can easily afford my mortgage (which is around 30% of the value of my home). I've taken a 3-year fix - things could get a lot worse (though probably won't over that period) - and I'm going to stop moaning about it. You've made someone happy about their mortgage going up by £600 a month . |
|
By:
is this guy telling us that his mortgage is going up $600 a month (sorry pal, me yankee i dont have pound sign on keyboard), this is from an increase is SVR of 0.25%, and the loan is 30% of the value.
the house must be worth $6,000,000 on my calcs. and he has a rate of 4.75% by getting this property via a liar loan from gambling earnings, with a name on the application of "Dr Evil". and the guy is moaning? this is who is being subsidised by below market interest rates. the market would not offer this guy 4.75%, unless it received printy printy and cheap government money by the shedload. meanwhile inflation of non slave labor goods, and a generation priced out of housing, and crippling zombie debt holding down everyone to bail out people like this guy. |
|
By:
Slightly inflammatory stuff there Ron: "liar loan", I'm scrupulously honest in all matters; a "bail out", or being "subsidised", isn't required.
I'm going from a nice BoE+2.25% tracker to the take-it-or-leave-it 4.75% fix. If you want to work back from there to find the value of my house you're welcome: it's not huge, but it is in the South East. I'm not moaning - thanks to you I've seen the light. To make a pound sign: hold down "alt" then type 1, 5, 6 (on the number pad, not the keys above the letters). When you let go of "alt" a £ should appear. |
|
By:
Yes. The state, scared of "having to" bail out banks again, has agreed new rules regarding how much money the banks must deposit with it rather than lending to the economy. As a result, the balance-sheet rebuild is sapping money from loans. So, they can't lend it to you because the government is taking it all.
|
|
By:
Dr Evil, excuse my tone, nothing is meant by it. I thought someone called "Dr Evil" would be able to handle it.
I have absolute no interest in screwing up my keyboard so i can type pound symbols. I have one question, if you aint down on this yankee. if you dont need to "lie" about your income, why do you need a self cert mortgage. just provide the evidence of what you earn. self cert are for people lieing, either what they earn, or lieing to the taxman. |
|
By:
No problemo Ronaldo - my skin is at least two inches thick, even at its thinnest point.
I don't wish to reveal too much of my personal business. I live solely on my gambling winnings, which I declare in full to HMRC; however, mortgage companies don't consider this as proper income. If they did I would be exactly the person they'd like to lend to - at their best rate - as it is I'm forced to accept less favourable terms. With self cert all I had to do was say "I can afford to pay this mortgage", which is no word of a lie; I'm 100% honest with the taxman too. |