Politics
I live in an area of almost total white people.
Apart from one or two blacks and a few asians who generally are shop owners.....I dont have any problems with these people and I shop in their shops.
I have a business that realies on local trade........
1) I dont think my business would survice in an area which was populated by more asians/blacks than whites.
2) I would never move into an area which had more asians/blacks than whites.
That said I dont have anything against these people on the whole as long as they dont cause me harm. But I do not want to be outnumbered by them.
AM I A RACIST?
I was shocked.
You are a total racist scum bag. I'm must tell you I cannot speak to you now. You are pure scum
Mar 9, 2012 -- 11:50PM, daz55o wrote:
i did know the word coloured was a bad word.
You did know or did not know?
You are supposed to say "people of colour" and not "coloured people."
How does that make a person racist. Brainwashing the sheeple.
Stupid - everyone should say coloured. It is pathetic. If everyone stuck two fingers up and ignored these freaks their power would be gone in a second.
No you are not racist on that basis of what you say.
You say your business might not survive if there were more non-whites.
Depends on the business - but let's say it is true.
You can't afford for the area to change. It is a survival thing.
The word racist was created as a control word. It is used by anti-racists who are the real racists. sibaroni laughs when I say he is a racist. He will deny that til the end of time but what he wants will run down the English culture and as I explained will eventually mean that large tracts of England are hardly recognisable. He is in Chester - he doesn't see it happening. He should come pay me or moisok a visit.
I do not hate any race. I have big issues with Zionists but I don't feel hate towards Jews. The Jews I have know have been great. I shared a house with Jews for two years. Fantastic crowd.
You might not like people who is not white English. That does not make you a racist. It does not mean you dislike them, you could be neutral. Who says you must like all people. You like your own people. Like to be with your own people. You like your own culture. If you properly read all the stuff I say you will realise I actually prefer to be with non English people - I chose to live where I am but that does not stop me complaining about what is happening to English society in general.
Wanting to be with your own people is normal the world over. When the USSR broke down lots of countries popped out of the woodwork. When Yugoslavia broke down it was the same. People want their own nations, their own people and their own culture. It is normal, natural and right.
It is not right to say you must like multiculturalism and we are going to ram it down your throat. If you don't like it, it is because you are a racist. What utter BS. Evil scum they are. They want to manipulate society for their own sick in the head motives.
No-one is forcing anything on you. Just you keep out of everyone else's life, thats all that is required.
Mar 10, 2012 -- 12:06AM, sibaroni wrote:
Wanting to define people by colour though, as you do, is plainly and obviously racist by the vast majority of people's definition.No-one is forcing anything on you. Just you keep out of everyone else's life, thats all that is required.
I do not define people by colour - they define themselves by their ethnic status. That will include as you put it "colour."
They do it themselves. The government does it, the council, social services.
So stop talking stupid.
I say I chose to live in a very mixed area. My friends are mostly non English. This is my choice. No-one is forcing anything on me.
But mass immigration has and is happening.
No-one asked the people.
They have no control over it because despite the major parties saying they will control it, Labour actually accelerated the process.
So it is being forced on the country.
This is a fact. So stop talking nonsense.
Then you come out with
"Just you keep out of everyone else's life, thats all that is required."
Who are you to tell me anything?
Pure arrogance.
Just a nasty racist hater, shove it.
I pulled your leg about the phrase you used on another thread. To illustrate how dumb this gets.
The NAACP (http://www.naacp.org/) is the USA's oldest and largest civil rights organisation. NAACP stands for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. An organisation advocating for blacks in America calls them coloured people.
This is why I say stupid nonsense. The largest civil rights organisation uses the term "color people" - defining people by colour, which sibaroni says "is plainly and obviously racist by the vast majority of people's definition."
This is why I say stick two fingers up at it. Just plain stupid nonsense but you get sibaroni trying to smear people and make them feel bad about themselves. So I say nasty person.
He would not say this to a person of colour - so that makes him a nasty racist person.
That you created a thread specifically about this subject and we had had a serious conversation on another thread is nothing to this racist.
Most of the forum see him for what he is, a twister bordering on a Troll.
10 Mar 12 00:06
Wanting to define people by colour though, as you do, is plainly and obviously racist by the vast majority of people's definition.
No-one is forcing anything on you. Just you keep out of everyone else's life, thats all that is required.
Well, it won't help much if a black or white man stabs somebody and they don't state the colour of the criminals skin when asking for witnesses. as it may be un-PC.
This is totally true.
Anyone who just sees people as black or white and rejects and despises them simply because they are black or white without knowing or wanting to know anything about them, they are a racist.
I know of people like that and I actually find it physically painful.
Notice - This is defining people by the colour of their skin and conjuring up a whole lot of qualities on that basis. This is just plain nonsense. Just crazy talk.
sib and I often conflict. I don't think he fully takes in what I am saying because I believe he is prejudiced against me. He is because he has labelled me a racist and automatically interprets what I say as racist and filters out most of what I write. Now and again he will turn nasty - so I call him nasty or block him. Then he will try to belittle and undermine what I have pointed out saying I am being sensitive. His techniques are fairly predictable really.
Stop getting a complex about this stuff.
We were talking about this subject so we were using words like white/black/Asian - we were talking - sibaroni butted in and he can butt out and shove it.
Someone somewhere decided one day to dictate that saying coloured person was wrong and you must now say person of colour. Coloured person is emphasing they are not white. Or we have this BS about, well everyone is some sort of colour even albinos are a colour, the colour white. You will also get, well you would not mention colour if they were white.
It just gives people a complex - which it is designed to do.
If you were in the middle of Africa and you had lived there all your life you would not mention black but you would sure as hell mention white.
When you are in a 90% white country, white is the default status so you don't mention it. If I lived in a 90% black country, black would be the default status and I would not mention black.
sibaroni has a tendency to believe everyone and his dog believe the same as he does. He still says that when everyone else on the thread says they disagree. Ignore this.
But I'm still racist according to Sib.
All my socks are black ffs.
young black unemployment
50 percent of young male blacks are unemployed
and 39 percent of young black women are unemployed
your definition of a rascist seems unique on here
1) I think the bbc licence fee should be scrapped on priniple that if you dont watch any bbc you still have to pay a licence fee....sibrini thinks we should keep the licence fee
2) I think the bbc is very biased on its news reporting to match the hidden agenda......sabrini thinks the bbc should alway be believed over any other news organisation.
3) I dont believe in the green global warming tax con.......sabrini thinks these nutcases who as he sees them are getting too much time on t.v.
4) I dont think the word coloured is offensive of racist....sabrini thinks using this word makes me racist
the list goes on and on.................
4) Because he doesnt like any of my opinions he is trying to discredit me as a racist..........
WHO IS GETTING IT SO WRONG?
No idea if this is true.
The Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation should not be believed. It is full of leftist subversives. They all lie, but the US media companies lie even more. They also serve the same master as unhinged.
Many on the forum believe sib is wrong about many things. Block him if he annoys.
Mar 10, 2012 -- 9:15PM, daz55o wrote:
they advertise their own progs on bbc just as bad...but i wont block sibaroni because in the end is views will be seen for what they are
A block only stops you seeing the posts. Betfair use a misleading word really, they should call it ignore and not block. As I say many on the forum believe sib is wrong about many things, so his views have already been seen for what they are.
no point in blocking him just because i dont agree with him he can have his opinion
10 Mar 12 11:13
The reason I think you are racist winkle is because you have been banned off the forum more times than any one can remember for breaching the sites rules prohibiting racist comments.
No I haven't.
I only ask so that I know who sib had directed the comment towards.
I simply wished to know whether he was sinking to fabricated slander in his subterfuge.
No.1 Was a strikingly good colt, now 6 feet tall, dark hair and brown eyes.
No.2 became a fatality before being born.
No.3 a well built filly, 5-8, with blonde hair and blue eyes.
No.4 A rangy filly, 5-8 with light brown hair and brown eyes.
Also Grandsire of two well built colts, 17 and 15, dark hair brown weyes, a tall rangy filly who is 9 years old tomorrow, blond with blue eyes, 8 month old colt, built like a brick outhouse, dark hair, brown eyes, and a 9 week old filly, light brown hair dark blue eyes, small but has plenty of scope.
And Winkle had very cheap Stud fee - a steak was normally enough.
