Poker
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
You have to wonder how much longer they are going to perserve with the current format. This weeks leaderboard has been running a few hours shy of 4 days. We haven't had a single update since it commenced, and when you check the leaderboardpage you get a message stating :
We are currently experiencing some technical difficulties with the points feed for the Skill and Go Leaderboard that started on 23.12.2011.
We anticipate having an updated leaderboard available by 14:00 CET on 26.12.2011.
Obvioulsly that deadline has long since been and gone.
In addition I still haven't been paid for the Leaderboard that finished last Thursday ! Mind you, they say there is a skill element, the last LB period I won over 600 bucks playing low stakes STTS, had a ROI of about 25%, and didn't even make the top 100.
We are currently experiencing some technical difficulties with the points feed for the Skill and Go Leaderboard that started on 23.12.2011.
We anticipate having an updated leaderboard available by 14:00 CET on 26.12.2011.
Obvioulsly that deadline has long since been and gone.
In addition I still haven't been paid for the Leaderboard that finished last Thursday ! Mind you, they say there is a skill element, the last LB period I won over 600 bucks playing low stakes STTS, had a ROI of about 25%, and didn't even make the top 100.
Show More
yes,but u didnt 'skillfully' multi table enough games at once for every hr of every day
Yeah, this is a very good point.
They say this new way of calculating the points is fairer towards the recreational poker/exchange punters, who they want to reward and retain. I'd class myself in that category. But if I cant get in the top 100 on a weekly spend of $2.5k and return of $3.1k, then not sure it's aimed at anyone other other than the Eastern European rake machines. One UK player in the top 50 seems to confirm this.
Certainly nobody holding down a day job could be even remotely competitive.
Hopefully my 15 bucks will be in the account tomorrow.
They say this new way of calculating the points is fairer towards the recreational poker/exchange punters, who they want to reward and retain. I'd class myself in that category. But if I cant get in the top 100 on a weekly spend of $2.5k and return of $3.1k, then not sure it's aimed at anyone other other than the Eastern European rake machines. One UK player in the top 50 seems to confirm this.
Certainly nobody holding down a day job could be even remotely competitive.
Hopefully my 15 bucks will be in the account tomorrow.
u sumerised it perfectly.
unfortunatly roi boards dont make money for sites.
i cant think of an easy answer to give the recreational players a chance.
unfortunatly roi boards dont make money for sites.
i cant think of an easy answer to give the recreational players a chance.
For a weekly Leaderboard to act as any kind of incentive it has to be updated regularly. You cannot run a proper 7 day Leaderboard where the first update is halfway through day five.
The only other change I would make at the moment is to scrap points awarded for games where players don't cash. This might stop a situation where 2 mates sit at 5 man $5 stts together for 12 hours a day.
There were a couple of suggestions floating about at the Q and A, like making it on the first 50 games per day, or first 300 games per week,which would still favour the grinders but give anyone prepared to have a go every now and again if they run well on day one or day two a chance.However, to be honest, until they get the updating issue sorted out the whole thing is self-defeating.
I dont chase it, and never would, I just happen to be in the top 200 most weeks anyway and have a quick glance to see where I'm at. However there's something not very skilful about a board where last week I finished 102nd after winning 600 bucks, and where this week I'm 107th, after winning 11 !
The only other change I would make at the moment is to scrap points awarded for games where players don't cash. This might stop a situation where 2 mates sit at 5 man $5 stts together for 12 hours a day.
There were a couple of suggestions floating about at the Q and A, like making it on the first 50 games per day, or first 300 games per week,which would still favour the grinders but give anyone prepared to have a go every now and again if they run well on day one or day two a chance.However, to be honest, until they get the updating issue sorted out the whole thing is self-defeating.
I dont chase it, and never would, I just happen to be in the top 200 most weeks anyway and have a quick glance to see where I'm at. However there's something not very skilful about a board where last week I finished 102nd after winning 600 bucks, and where this week I'm 107th, after winning 11 !
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539