After the flop the player who eventually loses the hand is shown as having 100% chance of winning and he other fella 0%. I folded the other King an all, so really didn't rate his chances at much more than 50/50 after the flop :
TEXAS_HOLDEM, NO_LIMIT, T5-196015022-48 played at "Table #1" for USD TC from 2011-11-30 15:29 until 2011-11-30 15:29
Seat 1: CrazyLoop24 (2,030 in chips) Seat 3: chipfire227 (1,955 in chips) Seat 6: x_kings7 (610 in chips) Seat 7: Lore201 (2,060 in chips) Seat 8: croxpot (2,345 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS CrazyLoop24 posts ante (40), chipfire227 posts ante (40), x_kings7 posts ante (40), Lore201 posts ante (40), croxpot posts ante (40), CrazyLoop24 posts small blind (200), chipfire227 posts big blind (400),
PRE-FLOP x_kings7 raises to 570 and is all-in, Lore201 folds, croxpot folds, CrazyLoop24 raises to 1,990 and is all-in, chipfire227 folds.
I folded the other King an all, so really didn't rate his chances at much more than 50/50 after the flop :
Sorry have i missed something here? Ive had a drink and maybe ive read it wrong but you ay that after the flop you dont rate the players chance at more than 50/50 when the only way he can win is to hit running Kings on the turn and river and youve already folded one, hmmmm
I folded the other King an all, so really didn't rate his chances at much more than 50/50 after the flop :Sorry have i missed something here? Ive had a drink and maybe ive read it wrong but you ay that after the flop you dont rate the players chance
The percentages come up automatically on the flop when both players are all in pre.
It deffo showed 100% vs 0% after the flop, though perhaps they round the figures up and/or down and the actual odds are 99.6% and 0.4%, dunno, but gnasher probably would.
Sure it jumped to 5% vs 95% after the turn, which looks right.
The percentages come up automatically on the flop when both players are all in pre.It deffo showed 100% vs 0% after the flop, though perhaps they round the figures up and/or down and the actual odds are 99.6% and 0.4%, dunno, but gnasher probably wou
I had the same scenario with AQ vs 77 with AQQ flop . My hand was indicating 100% , but I lost, no points for guessing how. As they don't show fractions ,in your case it was 99.7% , it gets rounded up. not so nice when it happens to you to you..
I had the same scenario with AQ vs 77 with AQQ flop . My hand was indicating 100% , but I lost, no points for guessing how.As they don't show fractions ,in your case it was 99.7% , it gets rounded up.not so nice when it happens to you to you..
TEXAS_HOLDEM, NO_LIMIT, T5-198025593-9 played at "Table #1" for USD TC from 2011-12-08 12:07 until 2011-12-08 12:08 Seat 1: pumkins (1,025 in chips) Seat 2: calltwice (2,215 in chips) Seat 3: gnasher8 (1,490 in chips) Seat 4: KIRIL07 (3,565 in