North American
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Just dont get some of the price movements:-
Why are Green Bay been backed to beat Washington ??? Cant be by anyone whos watched their last 10 games or so.Normally you'd say Rogers v Cousins no contest-not this season tho. Green Bay offense stinks-the lines got more injuries than players-the receivers cant get open-Lacy is banged up -only thing that will win game for GB is the defence
Minnesota backed to beat Seattle-only thing I can think of is the cold weather-but Seattles weather is hardly Miami. Teddy B hasnt got a long ball game and just cant see AP running against the Seattle D.In the 1st game forget the score-the Minnesota o-line got destroyed by the Seattle D-thats where the game starts and finishes.
Why are Green Bay been backed to beat Washington ??? Cant be by anyone whos watched their last 10 games or so.Normally you'd say Rogers v Cousins no contest-not this season tho. Green Bay offense stinks-the lines got more injuries than players-the receivers cant get open-Lacy is banged up -only thing that will win game for GB is the defence
Minnesota backed to beat Seattle-only thing I can think of is the cold weather-but Seattles weather is hardly Miami. Teddy B hasnt got a long ball game and just cant see AP running against the Seattle D.In the 1st game forget the score-the Minnesota o-line got destroyed by the Seattle D-thats where the game starts and finishes.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 836
|
By:
Agreed,,both matches,and analysis..
|
|
By:
not what I wanted to see 1st thing this morning-beast mode out
|
|
By:
Not sure how effective he would have been anyway. RB play from the Seahawks will be massive. Michael has good numbers but a small sample size, needs to at least do enough to give the Vikings something to think about. As good as the receivers have been, the conditions will not be conducive to a throw on every play style attack.
|
|
By:
A Peterson's back was at him as well...
|
|
By:
Just can't wait now for a marvellous two nights of entertainment
  |
|
By:
what am i missing here?
on the sports book they have "overtime play" - yes at 8/1 but on the regular time match odds it is "tie after normal time" - 14/1 is there a difference i'm not understanding? it's not really a market i have paid much attention to in the past but quite fancy the Chiefs @ Texans to be very tight and possibly overtime. |
|
By:
With you Larsson...cant wait.
 |
|
By:
ring them north. if you can get a bet on there you are a lucky man....
|
|
By:
i contacted them for a moan pre season when they knocked back a couple of fairly modest season long bets bets and in a surprising turn of events they actually agreed to relax restrictions to a certain extent.
i hardly ever use or had used the sportsbook so seemed a bit strange. i'm still mulling that one over but it is essentially the same bet with different prices in different markets isn't it? |
|
By:
is the 8/1 not for a winner in overtime whereas the 14/1 is for a tie after overtime???
|
|
By:
don't think it is. the markets are "overtime played yes/no" so that's pretty clear & "regular time match odds" HT, KCC & "tie after normal time"
the obvious difference is the second one has 3 outcomes but a 6pt difference is pretty skewed so making me wonder if i'm missing something especially as it is a similar difference on the exchange. it's probably glaringly obvious but i can't see what the difference is, assuming "normal time" means 60 mins. |
|
By:
Ok I not sure what you are asking pal but to me it's pretty straightforward , unless I'm totally missing something now
 anyways that's the first time I have ever looked at the sports book and probably the last  |
|
By:
no i don't look at it much either, as you can probably tell
 . they have pushed the tie out to 16/1 now too.all i was really asking was is the yes option of the overtime played bet the same as the tie after normal time bet. i can't see what the difference is and it was only the price discrepancy that was making me wonder. |
|
By:
Think we are better off keeping it that way
|
|
By:
after all that the max stake allowed is £4.70, ******* pathetic
   |
|
By:
|
|
By:
To the OP, Redskins have not beaten a team with a winning record and its Cousins v Rodgers. Think that is why public getting onboard
|
|
By:
Good luck everyone. Enjoy the wildcard weekend, apart from Seahawks fans
|
|
By:
think seahawks are a outstanding bet on the handicap.peterson hates the cold and to much reaction to lynch not playing.not had him for awhile now and they are getting better and better
sneeking fancy for the bengals tonight think they might just run the ball with the two backs and grind out a victory gl all |
|
By:
Two favourite NFL weekends of the year coming up. Invariably a few crackers in there, and you'd have to expect one this weekend. Particularly looking forward to Bengals and Steelers.
Although I'll be trading in-play, I have my biases and often trade accordingly:- This weekend I really like the Chiefs chances over the Texans. I've had in my mind for quite while that the Steelers look better than they actually are and that if they made the play-offs their suspect defense will catch-up on them. Tonight is night I believe. Williams out (or doubtful at best) obviously makes me more confident and I have been quite impressed by McCarron. Seahawks tomorrow - though Lynch being out is a bit of a blow - but have should have a bit too much for the Vikings. Couldn't call Packers and Redskins - and will be treading cautiously there. If pushed I'd go for Packers, with absolute minimum confidence. Should be great viewing. |
|
By:
Cheers, Clay all the best to you as well
 |
|
By:
Good evening .....small bet on Cincy with the points is my play in the first game....wouldn't say i was confident.
Good luck everyone. |
|
By:
pssst grayhawk........................that's the 2nd game
|
|
By:
That should have read Texans with the points is my play in the first game
.....wouldn't say i was confident It's been a long day ( counting the hours down ) |
|
By:
ssssshhh Northanlite...don't think anybody noticed
|
|
By:
Nellie....steelers have been strong against the run but really poor in the secondary.....if bengals wiln it will be through the air. They have to attack the steelers where they are weak. If bengals run the ball a lot they lose.
Big Ben is going to let loose tonight lock up your daughters |
|
By:
hello
|
|
By:
Really lookin forward to the games now,cant wait to see JJ Watt Live as really hasnt been to much coverage of the Texans up too now,some player...Hopin they nick a close one from a puntin viewpoint.
|
|
By:
I had no strong view on the early game but Clay's argument swayed me to an interest bet on the Chiefs. Late game done Bengals +3. GL all.
|
|
By:
Been of the booze since Cheltenham on new years day, supposed to do all Jan... will power waining fast with these games to look forward too.
 |
|
By:
Good morning peeps. Bring it on
 |
|
By:
Has Kevin changed his hair?
|
|
By:
Not had chance for a reasoned write up on the chiefs texans, did post my thoughts on the other games on the other thread. But in short i like the chiefs here.
|
|
By:
Thought big Kev was supposed to be back for the play offs.....mute button will be working overtime tonight
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
lmaooooooooooooooooooo
|
|
By:
0-7
|
|
By:
great start!!!!!
|
|
By:
|