
|
By:
big blow for the Pack,fancied them to win it all this year,could still do it but wont be easy without him...
|
|
By:
they are still pretty solid alright at wr - but it's a huge blow for bothe the packers and Nelson himself
|
|
By:
Plenty of depth. 6/1 looks value to win it all.
|
|
By:
Yeah think they have a chance and really hope they win it but 6/1 is a bit skinny for me. The Packers always seem to get horrendous injuries for some reason too
|
|
By:
Love some of the off season upgrades though, dl. I'm taking a little interest in the Pack.
|
|
By:
Yeah I will be cheering the Packers on myself orioles , seattle scare the life out of me though
|
|
By:
Good job Randall Cobb signed a 4 year deal after this blow. I don't think the Seahawks scared the packers too much last season if you forget about the freak final 3 minutes. It was a superb team performance up until then. As long as number 12 is on the field they will go again this season.
|
|
By:
Packers played brilliant in that match though Harry against a team which has a much better offence now. Packers threw that game away
![]() |
|
By:
Yes they did,both sides of the ball they were excellent for 57 minutes.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
home field advantage the key in the NFC playoffs last year (GB v Dallas and SS v GB). This injury doesn't help GB's total wins. SS schedule got easier v 2014 given regression of the others in the NFC West, particularly SF but also Arizona; fascinating offensive addition of Jimmy Graham good for SS but slight worry about Kam Chancellor holding out (for now). Suspect GB will have to travel to SS in the playoffs - even if Rodgers avoids injury this year, so don't see how 6/1 is some great price. Particularly given how they limped past Dallas, who are themselves likely to be even better this year, given the further O-Line investments.
I've covered SS and backed Dallas at 20/1, and given a likely slow start (Dallas) because of their schedule I'm hoping to get more on after 6-7 games at 33/1. |