MVP

harvin?

you have answered your question,such a team effort on defence how do you single one defensive player out? so just make it simple and give it to russ

agree harry having an mvp misses the point of what the seahawks are all about.
have to admit i thought denver might bring a bit more to the party.
NFC v AFC = no contest

must be one of the best team defensive superbowl performances ever and kam chancellor has stood out for me

they'll still give it to harvin or wilson though

best defensive? 36 pts scored points to decent offence
astonishing D,
this seahawks team is still very young. could be a legendary outfit

tbf they were very good last season also,just like the niners were, 2 stand out teams by far over last 2 seasons

NFC west is super hot. Arizona are not too shabby either

i think we could take the top 10 from the nfc & they would all beat the broncos

finally a td russ!!!
russell wilson clearly the diference maker,
thats enough for mvp isnt it??

arizona are very good playing in a harsh division

russell 4/1 now 1/3

Feb 3, 2014 -- 2:25AM, nugget wrote:

finally a td russ!!!russell wilson clearly the diference maker,thats enough for mvp isnt it??

just like obama, talk about token *****...

pete carroll climbing the ladder...

Cliff Avril.... Not even on the BF market but you could make a strong case for having the best game tonight.

i'm worried for america if they give the mvp to russell wilson, and i'm a russell wilson fan!!!

thank christ...

As a layer, I'm annoyed BF didn't load Avril so I'd love it if he won it.

Feb 3, 2014 -- 2:58AM, The real Moaner wrote:

As a layer, I'm annoyed BF didn't load Avril so I'd love it if he won it.

dont be surprised then...

Malcolm Smith, yes!!!

who will the MVP thank first ??  I went for No one.. (9-2)

Malcolm Smith? Wow.

who?

Wasn't even on the markets until HT!

and he thanked... no one :)

what did he do??

that is a nonsense mvp. was difficult to call but did not see that coming

what is nonsense about 10 tackles, a fumble recovery and an interception td?

they didn't notice those

smith wasnt even in the betting on here,was he added to the runners,should be void bets if he wasnt.

Feb 3, 2014 -- 4:17AM, book wrote:

smith wasnt even in the betting on here,was he added to the runners,should be void bets if he wasnt.

they did the punters a service by adding the eventual winner...

plus they would miss out on commission of winning bets

Why don't they just add "any other player" to the market FFS