Forums

North American

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
smb360
15 Nov 13 06:40
Joined:
Date Joined: 27 Jul 11
| Topic/replies: 62,727 | Blogger: smb360's blog
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/
1849595-high-school-coach-who-never-punts-explains-his-strategy

Interesting stuff. The numbers associated with calculating the pay-offs are probably different at NFL level, but perhaps there's a chance that NFL teams should be playing the same way.
Pause Switch to Standard View The high school football coach who...
Show More
Loading...
Report cpfc4me November 15, 2013 6:51 AM GMT
Check out the book Stumbling On Wins in Football By David J. Berri, Martin B. Schmidt if you like this kind of stuff - and who doesn't?!
Report therhino November 15, 2013 12:33 PM GMT
It's another moneyball theory. Love it. A good thing to show the kids who don't thinks maths is relevant.
Report curious-cat November 16, 2013 3:42 AM GMT
4 + 0 = 7 ?
Report johnwark November 16, 2013 1:30 PM GMT
Would an NFL team be able to recover that many onside kicks?

Definitely some merit in the thinking about punting near your own goal line. The 4th and 7 in the example might be pushing it though
Report Knight Rider November 16, 2013 3:00 PM GMT
I definitely think coaches should go for it on 4th down more often.  They are scared of doing anything unconventional because they will take the heat for it after the game if it goes wrong, whereas if you make the safe call the players take the blame.  Does anyone remember Patriots v Colts a few years ago, where New England went for it on 4th down in their own half near the end of the game, failed and lost the game?  The press had a field day with Belichick there but it was absolutely the right call in the circumstances.  Essentially Brady needed one completion to win the game, otherwise Peyton Manning has the ball in his hands and the extra 40 yards from a punt probably wouldn't have mattered.

High school football is a bit different to the pros in a few ways.  Firstly, punters don't have anywhere near the same length or hangtime so your net gain from punting is far less.  Secondly the defenses aren't as good so possession is worth a lot more.  Going for it on 4th down is actually fairly common.

Onside kicks are a different matter but what the coach said makes a lot of sense.  Even with just a 20% recovery rate, if you are only giving up 14 yards on average then it's a value play.  It nullifies the chance of a kickoff return TD as well.  Not sure if this would translate to the pros as they seem very well drilled at stopping onside kicks when they know they are coming.  In fact I can't remember the last time I saw the kicking team recover one, other than doing them unexpectedly (like the Saints in the Superbowl for example).
Report TheVis November 17, 2013 12:48 PM GMT
about 1 in 10 onside kicks are a success I think
Report DirkDiggler November 17, 2013 2:38 PM GMT
says it all really...
Report Lix November 18, 2013 2:09 PM GMT
the numbers must be very different in NFL than college ball i imagine. IN the video he says there's a 70+% chance of a TD when you get the ball back on the halfway line. must be a lot lower in NFL games hence punting on 4th and long the correct thing to do
Report Roger De Bris November 18, 2013 8:32 PM GMT
great link.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com