|
By:
I wouldn't be confident about the Colts giving anyone a 10 point start just now.
They've struggled badly without Reggie Wayne since he got injured. Still not sure how they beat the Texans and last week's shambles speaks for itself. |
|
By:
Eh the Titans lost to the Jags ffs in case anyway failed to notice
|
|
By:
Agreed with Marcce. The Colts were my 2nd team after the Bears as I'm a massive Andrew Luck fan. However since Reggie Wayne got injured, the colts receivers have looked woeful and the O line got totally ran over and destroyed last week by the Rams. The Titans are hardly in great form themselves, but with home advantage I think they are in a better position of the 2 to avenge last weeks shambles.
Colts 17 - 24 Titans for me. |
|
By:
Eh the Titans lost to the Jags ffs in case anyway failed to notice
They did indeed and the week before that they beat the same Rams side that battered the Colts last week. If the Colts have found a way to overcome the loss of Wayne they could cover but there's been very little sign they have over the past couple of weeks. A short week won't have given them much time to work on things too much either. Just too many doubts at present to be confident about them winning the game at all let alone by 10 and more. Think this game is going to be a no bet for me. |
|
By:
NOT SURE BOUT 10 POINTS PAL. TITANS CHASING TOP SPOT ASWELL SO WILL BE A TOUGH 1 FOR COLTS TO COVER 10
|
|
By:
I LIKE THE OVER 42 HERE
|
|
By:
Calling Liam, if here - only "lumping" to be done is laying the first team to hit 1.15 or so...........
![]() |
|
By:
Colts defence has been a bit of a shambles so far. Easy first score touchdown for the titans. Hope they can keep it up.
|
|
By:
COLTS LOOK HORRIBLE DEFENSIVELY ... GOOD FOR MY OVER
![]() |
|
By:
That should be a fumble, he wasn't down by contact.
|
|
By:
Should have challenged it sooner. Not sure why he waited so close to the snap. Colts defence is awful.
|
|
By:
Happy with myself putting Johnson in my fantasy team just before this match started. Man, after the Broncos game it was all looking good for the Colts and the superbowl dream. If you tuned in now you'd think you was watching the Jags ![]() |
|
By:
Pleasing. so far (other than slightly too conservative in initial Titans back)
Don't think it was a fumble tbh......live I thought it was, on the reply Fitzpatrick looked to deliberately put the ball into the ground |
|
By:
*replay*
|
|
By:
This has the makings of a decent game. Andrew Luck and Chris Johnson are great viewing
|
|
By:
THE WAY THEYRE PLAYING YOUD THINK REGGIE WAYNE PLAYED DEFENSE OFFENSE COORDINATOR AND COACH
|
|
By:
Wallflower I don't think it matters whether he deliberately puts the ball on the ground. The only way the play is dead is either down by contact or if the QB gives himself up, which he can only do by sliding feet first or by kneeling behind the line of scrimmage. Similar situation happened a few weeks ago with RG3.
|
|
By:
Ok I see.....to confirm...(accepting he definitely didn't slide feet first)
(a) if contact was made and then ground caused fumble (which it did, he made do so), then he was ok (b) if contact wasn't made, then it was a fumble You think (b)? I'm not sure now. |
|
By:
someone watching is a good 5 seconds ahead of the sky coverage
|
|
By:
DHB Drops more balls than he catches, he's fecking hopeless
|
|
By:
Yeah I'm pretty sure it was b). Got the NBA on now so I'm not sure if they've shown it again; probably not as the commentators seemed oblivious to the whole thing. Surprising the lack of rules knowledge among players, coaches & commentators! Some of the decisions to challenge/not challenge are just baffling.
|
|
By:
lendmeurwheelbarrow 15 Nov 13 02:13
someone watching is a good 5 seconds ahead of the sky coverage ------------------------------------------------------------------ Canada, I think. Shouldn't make that much difference to be honest....30-45 secs between plays |
|
By:
aye as long as you're not leaving your money up till you see what happens
![]() |
|
By:
I'm just thankful, we don't have to suffer BBC (MNF)......at one stage last year were 2 plays behind.....I went to bed a few times with frustartion
![]() |
|
By:
Here comes the Colts fightback.
![]() |
|
By:
They should have gone for it there
|
|
By:
lol colts 3 big pens in a row
|
|
By:
seriously what are the colts at here?absolute mugs
|
|
By:
ITS GETTING CHIPPY IN TENNESSEE
![]() |
|
By:
Should have been ejected there.
|
|
By:
are the refs watching the same game as me? how's that guy still on the field?
![]() |
|
By:
Colts falling apart at the seams
|
|
By:
another one when the play was dead
|
|
By:
diving for a penalty in the nfl
now I've seen everything. |
|
By:
Flop Fitzpatrick
|
|
By:
SUAREZ WOULDA BEEN PROUD
|
|
By:
WHY IS SKY GO 10 MINS BEHIND
|
|
By:
Hands like feet
![]() |
|
By:
Beaniash 15 Nov 13 02:43
WHY IS SKY GO 10 MINS BEHIND --------------------------------- Don't know why, its a pain that way.......only really useful for test cricket imo |